There are sensible reasons why information on who funds political parties or what taxes people pay should be public. I can’t think of any reasons it needs to be quite so in-your-face accessible though: funding of US presidential candidates/the taxable income of every Norwegian in the last three years.
Previous Post
teaching infectious art Next Post
i’m blogging this 4 thoughts on “common knowledge”
Leave A Comment Cancel reply
Recommended Posts
Last night I attended the OpenAI Forum Welcome Reception at OpenAI’s new offices in San Francisco. The Forum is a recently launched initiative from OpenAI that is meant to be “a community designed to unite thoughtful contributors from a diverse array of […]
I’m thrilled to announce another publication from our European Research Council (ERC)-funded research project on Machine Vision: Gabriele de Setaand Anya Shchetvina‘s paper analysing how Chinese AI companies visually present machine vision technologies. They find that the Chinese machine vision imaginary is global, blue and competitive. […]
Whenever I give talks about ChatGPT and LLMs, whether to ninth graders, businesses or journalists, I meet people who are hungry for information, who really want to understand this new technology. I’ve interpreted this as interest and a need to understand – […]
Having your own words processed and restated can help you improve your thinking and your writing. That’s one reason why talking with someone about your ideas can help you clarify your thoughts. ChatGPT is certainly no replacement for a knowledgable friend or colleague, […]
Like the rest of the internet, I’ve been playing with ChatGPT, the new AI chatbot released by OpenAI, and I’ve been fascinated by how much it does well and how it still gets a lot wrong. ChatGPT is a foundation model, that […]
A few weeks ago Meta released Galactica, a language model that generates scientific papers based on a prompt you type in. They put it online and invited people to try it out, but had to remove it after just three days after […]
Eirik
I agree. What’s more, this information isn’t necessarily reliable. For instance, the taxable income published in Norway often says more about how good someone’s accountant is, rather than what they really earned.
BTW: Nice to have have you back and blogging again! 🙂
Lars
Precisely the reason why the records are public, Eirik. You probably already know who is rich and who is not. You probably wouldn’t know that the rich guy pays less taxes than the other guy if this information wasn’t public. Of course, drowning the interesting inequalities in a sea of average incomes sort of ruins the point. But the law can’t discriminate. That’s up to the editor (or, in this case, possibly up to the person conducting the search).
Eirik
You seem to have missed my point, which is this: when the public records are misleading, as is often the case here, they are essentially useless. I do not necessarily know who is rich and who is not, and I have no sure way of finding out whether the number listed reflects true income or is the result of clever tax planning (really rich guys usually own companies, remember).
Deena
Yes, but if you look at the overall statistics, it is alarming. Particularly at http://www.fundrace.org/citymap.php
which shows how MUCH more money Bush is getting!