The latest issue of the German journal SPIEL (Siegener periodical for International Empirical Literature Study) gathers articles discussing how electronic literature, digital art and other born-digital genres can be archived. (Scroll down for English when you follow that link.) Unfortunately the issue isn’t online (perhaps it will be easier to archive it on paper) but many of the articles look interesting. The Electronic Literature Collection is discussed by Scott Rettberg, the Electronic Literature Directory by Joe Tabbi. The restoration (and thus, reeappearance) of an early piece by Olia Lialina, Agatha Appears, is discussed by Elzbieta Wysocka. Simon Biggs, a collaborator in the ELMCIP project, has an article with the somewhat disheartening title “Publish and Die”, which is about the preservation of digital literature in the UK. Hans Kristian Rustad writes about Nordic electronic literature, and Patricia Tomaszek, who is a PhD candidate at our department, has an article titled “Reading, Describing, and Evaluating Electronic Literature of Archiving. There are also a number of interesting-looking articles in German.

There are several interesting collections of articles out from Siegen, and if you’re interested in electronic literature, I’d recommend having a look and asking your library to buy them.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

2 thoughts on “anthology on archiving electronic literature

  1. The Library

    The library has ordered the book.
    http://ask.bibsys.no/ask/action/show?pid=102761221&kid=biblio
    Contact the library if you want to reserve it!

  2. Jill Walker Rettberg

    Impressive service, Aud! Thanks!!

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

AI STORIES

AI-generated stories have longer endings than human stories

My colleague Jessica Witte has just shared a preprint where she compared the emotional arcs of the stories we generated using gpt-4o-mini to those of human-authored (pre-2022) stories from the subreddit r/WritingPrompts, conveniently gathered in this dataset. She found a distinct difference in the endings of the LLM-generated stories: both […]

How to peer review a paper in 2026

Dorothy Bishop, a psychologist, wrote a useful list of what reviewers need to look out now that so many papers are bad science that looks good thanks to LLMs. Read her whole blog post, she explains it well, but here’s a brief version because I’m pretty sure we’ll be needing […]

“So what if it was ChatGPT? It *could* have been true!”

I recently read a good article on the different kinds of truth a language model operates with by Luke Mann, Liam Magee and Vanicka Arora, Truth Machines: Synthesizing Veracity in AI Language Models, but despite its lovely typology of truths (consensus, correspondence, coherence and pragmatic) it doesn’t help me with […]

AI STORIES

AI shimmer and sparkle

I have this hunch that sparkles and glow and shimmer are somehow a point in the latent spaces of LLMs that have more connections than you would expect. Perhaps their connotation to magic and to the unknown matches some of the mystique of genAI? Or perhaps these words are used […]

Don’t do a systematic review if you’re in the humanities

This paper is a great example of why you probably shouldn’t use a systematic literature review for a theoretical and conceptual research question like “How does artificial intelligence affect the perception of authenticity and aura in art?” However, if you’re looking for an annotated list of 48 recent articles about […]