We’re going to be demoing the ELMCIP Electronic Literature Knowledge Base on our tour of the US, and I’ve mapping some paths through it that demonstrate some of my favourite aspects of the Knowledge Base. The Knowledge Base is a relationship database built in Drupal, with about 4000 nodes now, after a year and a half of development. There are entries for creative works of electronic literature and for critical works in the field, and these are connected both to each other (“This creative work is referenced by these critical works”) and to entries for authors, events the works may have been presented at, syllabi for courses they were taught in and more. So there’s bibliometric information, but also the potential for extracting social networks and more.

Here’s the page showing the most recently updated creative works. Right now there are 1175 creative works registered, and we add new works daily. Here I especially like being able to search by year published and by language.

Here’s a graph showing how the creative works are distributed by date of publication. This was made in Google Fusion, we don’t yet have a plugin to do this.

Here’s the page for a single creative work: Stephanie Strickland’s slippingglimpse:

The left column shows all the bibliographic information and links to the different versions of the work that are available online. There’s a brief description of the work, and a list of links to critical writing in the Knowledge Base that references the work.

Further down on the entry page you can also see which course syllabi registered in the Knowledge Base where this work is taught:

Here’s a screenshot of the Knowledge Base entry for the middle course listed there, Lori Emerson‘s graduate course on Digital Poetry and the Limits of Interpretation.

If you look at the entry itself you’ll see the many creative and critical works Lori uses in the course, and follow through to all the links. This is a hugely useful tool for developing new courses on electronic literature, because you can so easily see how other people teaching a particular work have used complementary works and essays, and when you add a work to your syllabus, you can very easily see which critical writing references it. Teachers, authors, critics and students can all request accounts and edit their own entries, much like in the Wikipedia. (You do have to request an account and show some basic interest in electronic literature, simply to avoid spam.)

Another useful way of using the syllabus function is to let your students build the syllabus in the Knowledge Base. Teachers can be given special features where they can see their students’s work, and students can add links to works already in the Knowledge Base and create new entries for works not already there.

Another way to explore the Knowledge Base is by starting with an author. Chris Funkhouser’s entry lists two creative works he has made, a string of critical writing, shows a journal he edits, and links to the entry for a syllabus of a course he has taught. We can click through to the entry for his new book, New Directions in Digital Poetry, and see links to all the creative works and critical writing substantially dealt with in the book.

There are more – just click the screenshot to see the full entry. Actually, the ELMCIP team at UiB had a “Friday Funkfest” where they (unfortunately, I couldn’t join them that day) spent several hours jamming together to get entries in place for all the works referenced in the book.

Today we’re off to the School of the Art Intitute in Chicago, where we’re meeting Judd Morrissey in Art and Technology and doing our first presentation. I’d better go and get ready!


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

1 Comment

  1. […] Jill Walker Rettberg’s tour of the new Electronic Literature Knowledge Base. […]

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Screenshot of a paragraph from a New York Times article published May 12, 2026. Text reads: "The price of tomatoes -tart bursts of flavor in salads and sandwiches — surged nearly 40 percent in April from a year ago on a combination of bad weather, high tariffs and climbing transportation costs."
AI STORIES

Genre glitches and unexpected promotional phrases as a sign of AI writing

A genre glitch is a characteristic of LLM-assisted writing where the text suddenly switches genre, typically inserting a short promotional phrase full of sensory details into an informational text. Genre glitches occur when a word in the generated text is heavily associated with a genre or context that is markedly […]

Top of a ransom note from Shinyhunters hacking group. Text reads: "SHINYHUNTERS rooting your systems since '19 ;) ShinyHunters has breached Instructure (again). Instead of contacting us to resolve it they ignored us and did some "security patches"."
Networked Politics University politics

UiB self-hosts the open source version of Canvas, so wasn’t affected by the breach

On May 1st Canvas announced a security breach, and then yesterday the system was hacked. The login page was replaced by a ransom note: if universities don’t pay up by 12 May, student data will be released. Here’s what the login page looked like yesterday: Way back in 2015, when […]

AI and algorithmic culture Networked Politics

AI-generated images, fascist aesthetics: Dieselbrølet and Heimatstrom

My German is pretty dodgy, so when I first saw Heimatstrom on Bluesky, shared by Roland Meyer, a professor of visual culture at Universität Zürich’s Digital Society Initiative, I misinterpreted it and thought it was a far-right campaign. But no, Heimatstrom is a group of left-wing environmentalists using fascist AI […]

Photo of a billboard ad at Oslo S train station showing a smiliing conductor and the text "Du må ikke sove. Joda, bare sov du."
AI STORIES

“Du må ikke sove”: a floating motif detached from its meaning (or: LLMs can write Norwegian but miss cultural references)

There’s a new ad for the train between Stavanger and Oslo in Norway that uses a line from Arnulf Øverland’s famous anti-fascist poem Du må ikke sove (“You must not sleep”). Du må ikke sove, you must not sleep, the ad says. And then it flips it, jovially, joda, bare […]

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.