view from the back of the crowd at the Contagious Media Showdown Launch Party Thursday night

Jonny Goldstein, videoblogging us

view report
Download/Play 4.1MB Quicktime
Download/Play 0.8MB Quicktime

We left the launch party kind of early. Well, actually, we arrived kind of late, because it takes a while to get from JFK to Manhattan, especially when you want to stop by the hotel on the way. It was probably just as well we were late, ‘cos that meant we didn’t see the presentation of 60 second story. See, we were first on the list (note to self: numbers in titles are cool for alphabetisation) and the panel went through the list, showing us each of the contestants’ projects in turn, but skimming the less immediately obvious ones very quickly. Ours didn’t have any big catchy images on the front page (too many words, words are so difficult, amazing blogs are popular really given how people find words hard) so apparently it was skipped past after about 3 seconds viewing.

We knew nobody there. I mean, I think I’ve exchanged emails with Jonah Peretti once or twice, and I know of Nick Denton (yeah, Gawker, blog media mogul if there is such a thing) and the guy who co-founded Hot or Not (oh dear) was there too, but you know, I was shy. Even wearing my I’m blogging this t-shirt. My first venture into the New York art scene (if this was that) was not a great success.

Contagious media, it seems, is very simply about getting as many hits as possible. That means whatever you want to push has to have instant and broad appeal. Therefore the video of the Farting Saucers (a kid on flying saucers at an amusement park with an added audio track of farts) was pronounced a likely winner by the panel. I’m pleased to say 60 second story is way ahead of the farting so far — see, there’s a list of stats updated regularly. As you can see, we’re never going to make it to the top for pure hits, but we’re doing pretty well on the technorati links from blogs. And though I think such competition for links is despicable and found it all most depressing (it’s commercialism! with no money!) I’m deep enough in that I’m happy to be a linkwhore for this: link us!

When we saw a genuine videoblogger outside Eyebeam, enthusiastically interviewing a guy from collegehumor.com with the video function on his still camera, I had to video him. That, of course, inspired us, so we now have lots of silly video footage on our still cameras that will be edited into a 60 second news report on the contagious media show. Quite soon. Meanwhile, I give you a loop of 14 seconds of video of a genuine videoblogger. Simply click play.

update: We got all inspired by the videoblogger we saw last night, and lo and behold, when we put all the tiny video clips off the still camera into iMovie and pressed play they seemed, to us, an excellent report on the launch party. We snipped off some unfitting bits, added titles, experimented with various export settings and now, lo and behold, behold a video blogged report on the launch party by us. Click the bottom image to view.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

3 thoughts on “report from the launch party

  1. jonah

    Hi Jill. Don’t be shy next time, it would have been nice to meet in person.

  2. Jill

    Ooh. Yeah, I know, shyness is silly. Thanks for commenting, Jonah!

  3. […] jill/txt 20/5/2005 [report from the launch party] […]

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Screenshot of a paragraph from a New York Times article published May 12, 2026. Text reads: "The price of tomatoes -tart bursts of flavor in salads and sandwiches — surged nearly 40 percent in April from a year ago on a combination of bad weather, high tariffs and climbing transportation costs."
AI STORIES

Genre glitches and unexpected promotional phrases as a sign of AI writing

A genre glitch is a characteristic of LLM-assisted writing where the text suddenly switches genre, typically inserting a short promotional phrase full of sensory details into an informational text. Genre glitches occur when a word in the generated text is heavily associated with a genre or context that is markedly […]

Top of a ransom note from Shinyhunters hacking group. Text reads: "SHINYHUNTERS rooting your systems since '19 ;) ShinyHunters has breached Instructure (again). Instead of contacting us to resolve it they ignored us and did some "security patches"."
Networked Politics University politics

UiB self-hosts the open source version of Canvas, so wasn’t affected by the breach

On May 1st Canvas announced a security breach, and then yesterday the system was hacked. The login page was replaced by a ransom note: if universities don’t pay up by 12 May, student data will be released. Here’s what the login page looked like yesterday: Way back in 2015, when […]

AI and algorithmic culture Networked Politics

AI-generated images, fascist aesthetics: Dieselbrølet and Heimatstrom

My German is pretty dodgy, so when I first saw Heimatstrom on Bluesky, shared by Roland Meyer, a professor of visual culture at Universität Zürich’s Digital Society Initiative, I misinterpreted it and thought it was a far-right campaign. But no, Heimatstrom is a group of left-wing environmentalists using fascist AI […]

Photo of a billboard ad at Oslo S train station showing a smiliing conductor and the text "Du må ikke sove. Joda, bare sov du."
AI STORIES

“Du må ikke sove”: a floating motif detached from its meaning (or: LLMs can write Norwegian but miss cultural references)

There’s a new ad for the train between Stavanger and Oslo in Norway that uses a line from Arnulf Øverland’s famous anti-fascist poem Du må ikke sove (“You must not sleep”). Du må ikke sove, you must not sleep, the ad says. And then it flips it, jovially, joda, bare […]

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.