I’m going to Salzburg today, to the program committee meeting for ACM’s Hypertext ’05. Hypertext ’98 was the first conference I ever went to. It was my first time in the US and my first long journey absolutely all alone, knowing nobody. I was so scared I thought of just not going, but thank goodness my supervisor insisted that not only should I go, but I also had a task: I had to give his regards to Stuart Moulthrop. That involved talking with Stuart Moulthrop, terrifying thought, though of course, once I did I found he was human and actually really friendly and gave me some great advice on my MA thesis.

So I’ve been a reviewer for a few years, and this year they asked me to be on the program commitee as co-chair for the literary hypertext theme, and I get to go to Salzburg which my girlfriend tells me is the most beautiful town in Austria. The hypertext conferences are interesting, because there are always lots of computer scientists, but there are also always some literary types who are interested in using hypertext for writing. I also like the way in which the conference looks after its history by making an effort to cite previous works in the community. There’s an awareness that people have been working on this stuff for decades that I appreciate. Papers are also reviewed much more thoroughly and helpfully than I’ve seen at other conferences.

It’s the first time I’ve been on the kind of program commitee where you actually fly in and meet in person. They have this great system this year, with junior and senior theme chairs. So Jim Rosenberg, who’s knows the hypertext conferences in and out, is the senior chair for my theme and I get to ask him all the dumb questions. He’s not actually going to the meeting, though.

I was really pleased to see that there are steam baths at the hotel, and have packed my bathers!


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

8 thoughts on “salzburg

  1. Toril

    It all sounds very exiting and a lot of fun. Enjoy yourself, Jill, and make sure you
    have at least one of those steam baths 🙂

  2. Jose Angel

    Yesterday in class we were discussing Moulthrop’s “You Say You Want a Revolution?” which made its way into the Norton Anthology of Criticism and Theory. By the way, do you know whether there is anything the matter with him? His website at Baltimore was last updated in 2002, øHas he moved elsewhere?
    I hope you enjoy the conference and Salzburg, and that you will tell us here anything you underline twice.

  3. nick

    I’ve haven’t been in touch with Stuart very recently, but since 2002 he’s completed Pax, written an article about Varicella with me, and published a great piece in First Person – “From Work to Play: Molecular Culture in the Time of Deadly Games.” I imagine he’s still very busy getting his new School of Information Arts and Technologies established at the University of Batimore – a Herculean administrative task – but other than that I don’t know of anythnig the matter with him.

  4. Scott

    And I heard from Jill that he has a paper in the hopper for HT05. So there is little wrong with him other than the usual ailments that befall hypertext authors in the midst of their careers (sudden metalepsis, fragmented consciousness, well-justified paranoia, etc.).

  5. torill

    Add the same illness that bugs us all: the sudden lack of hours in a day. He was perfectly fine when I visited this fall, except he was struggling to expand on the 24 hours concept.

  6. Jill

    Aw, I wonder whether Stuart’ll read all this concern for him. Stuart, we *heart* you!

  7. Matthew

    I was in Salzburg last summer, I absolutely loved it! Vienna being Vienna, it just did not have the character of Salzburg. I hope that, besides the conference activities, you get to do some sightseeing, walk around and enjoy the city. Looking at your photos made me dig in the archives and post some of my own.

  8. jill/txt »

    […] text, a paper that just got accepted for Hypertext ‘05 (they sent me out of the room when they discussed it) and that started from a stray sentence in the French peoples’ initial notes where they r […]

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Top of a ransom note from Shinyhunters hacking group. Text reads: "SHINYHUNTERS rooting your systems since '19 ;) ShinyHunters has breached Instructure (again). Instead of contacting us to resolve it they ignored us and did some "security patches"."
Networked Politics University politics

UiB self-hosts the open source version of Canvas, so wasn’t affected by the breach

On May 1st Canvas announced a security breach, and then yesterday the system was hacked. The login page was replaced by a ransom note: if universities don’t pay up by 12 May, student data will be released. Here’s what the login page looked like yesterday: Way back in 2015, when […]

AI and algorithmic culture Networked Politics

AI-generated images, fascist aesthetics: Dieselbrølet and Heimatstrom

My German is pretty dodgy, so when I first saw Heimatstrom on Bluesky, shared by Roland Meyer, a professor of visual culture at Universität Zürich’s Digital Society Initiative, I misinterpreted it and thought it was a far-right campaign. But no, Heimatstrom is a group of left-wing environmentalists using fascist AI […]

Photo of a billboard ad at Oslo S train station showing a smiliing conductor and the text "Du må ikke sove. Joda, bare sov du."
AI STORIES

“Du må ikke sove”: a floating motif detached from its meaning (or: LLMs can write Norwegian but miss cultural references)

There’s a new ad for the train between Stavanger and Oslo in Norway that uses a line from Arnulf Øverland’s famous anti-fascist poem Du må ikke sove (“You must not sleep”). Du må ikke sove, you must not sleep, the ad says. And then it flips it, jovially, joda, bare […]

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.