This joke is sadly true, and explains why we Norwegians are all thrilled that summer’s here, although it’s only about 10?C today… It’s light until 11 pm though! That’s pretty good! I got the joke in email and can’t find it on the web, so I’m generously posting it here:

+15?C
This is the warmest it gets in Norway, so let’s start
here;
The Spanish put on winter coats, hats and mittens.
Norwegians sunbathe.

+10?C
The French desperately try to start the central
heating in their homes.
Norwegians plant flowers in their garden.

+5?C
Italian cars don’t start.
Norwegians cruise around in convertibles with the
top down.

0?C
Water freezes.
The water in the Oslo Fjord thickens slightly.

-5?C
People in California nearly perish from the cold.
Last barbecue of the season in Norway.

-10?C
The British run up the heat in their houses to max.
Norwegians put on a long-sleeved sweater.

-20?C
Australians leave for home, shellshocked.
Norwegians realise that summer has turned to autumn.

-30?C
Greeks die of cold by the thousands and disappear
from the face of the earth.
Norwegians start to dry their laundry indoors.

-40?C
Paris cracks and crumbles into pieces from the cold.
Norwegians stand patiently in line to buy hot dogs.

-50?C
Polar bears evacuate the North Pole.
The Norwegian army postpones their winter manouvres,
waiting for real winter
weather.

-60?C
Santa Claus moves south.
Norwegians are frustrated, as they can no longer
store moonshine outdoors.

-70?C
The Norwegian army commences their winter manouvres

-183?C
Microbes in food die.
Norwegian cows complain that the hands of the
milkers feel cold.

-273?C
All atomic movement ceases.
Norwegians agree: “Shit, today it really feels cold
outside!”

-300?C
Hell freezes over.
Norway wins the Eurovision Song Contest.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

5 thoughts on “why norwegians think it’s summertime now

  1. peter

    how nice

  2. Rorschach

    I hate to say it but:
    “-5?CPeople in California nearly perish from the cold. Last barbecue of the season in Norway.”

    This just isn’t true. Being from southern CA I can say with much authority that anything below about 15?C is freezing. Really! You can tell from the winter parkas! Heck, anything below around 65?F for me is time to turn on the heater.

    At -5?C I’m pretty sure all life would stop. I get scared when there’s that white crunchy stuff (frost) on my lawn in the morning. “AAAHH!!! The world must be ending!”

    Wussy you say? Damn straight! That’s why I live in a place where I can drive from the snow to the beach in a matter of a couple of hours!

  3. Anne

    LOL! I notice Canadians are not included in this list – perhaps because we also understand the cold! Although it does get over +30?C in summer here, I’m always grateful to meet others who know how evil freezing rain can be and how life does not actually grind to a halt when it’s -40?C 😉 …

    Are there also lots of babies born in Norway nine months after the coldest winter days?

    And does it really not go over +15?C ? I would have thought it was more like here 😉

  4. torill

    Actually, Norwegian babies are born in February. Spring and early summer is interesting in Norway.

  5. i1277

    It was 26 degrees the other day, so yes, it does get warmer. But here in Bergen at least, 15 is more of a standard. I think we have “London-weather”, only slightly colder and more rain. Temting, eh?

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.