I just withdrew from a book project I was excited about because there literally aren’t enough hours in the day to write the article they’d asked me to write. Realistically, I should withdraw from at least two other projects, too, but damn it, I promised and I’ve got so far on them.

Quite often, being head of department stinks. Hours and hours and hours on scanning letters I have to consider whether to act on, writing reports, organising teaching, fighting for the future of our department and for the jobs of my colleagues. And yet what I’m trained for, and what I’ll be promoted on the basis of, is research and to some extent teaching.

Yes, I’m angry.

I think I’m entitled to a semester’s sabbatical next year (yes I know, the basic rules are great, a semester after three years, and I know lots and lots of colleges and universities have far higher teaching loads than we do and no sabbaticals: but we’re supposed to be a research university, promotion is based almost solely on publication), but the rules are such that you can’t actually GET the sabbatical unless your department can cover your workload. If I’m on sabbatical, there are only 1.5 tenured teachers here to look after our 150-200 students. Plus lots of temporarily employed and very skilful teachers, the students would do OK, but how the heck would the tenured staff manage?

And yeah, as head of department it’s possible I could have helped myself in this situation, only I don’t yet know exactly how. Maybe I should ask my peers to vote that the head of department should get a research assistant or something.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

5 thoughts on “when administration sucks

  1. Toril

    Jill, sometimes (even quite often) it is GREAT to be just a student, but the hard
    work you are constantly putting behind you is admireable!! And I fully understand the
    need for a sabbatical year, although we certainly NEED you here, so please hang in
    there 🙂

  2. AndrÈ-S-C

    It sucks. And it seems to be everywhere. In the latest article at DesignObserver they (designers) whinge about interfering clients etc, but the only way to avoid that is to play politics and commerce to ensure you have some clout, in other words doing everything except being a designer in the strict sense of the word ñ think its this way in most professions, sooner or later promotion and or success means or requires a departure from what you do into the abysmal vortexes of administration and politics :- (

  3. Jill

    I’ve suspected most professions might have similar problems. It seems rather a dismal view though, if life is all suppposed to be like this…

    Oh, obviously there are things I’m really happy about at work too. Sure.

  4. Patrik

    Jill,

    I am sure you will manage to get as much promoted as is possible academically (full professor or whatever) even if being a department head makes it slower. Another way of looking on this is that the adminstrative/management work you do actually opens the door to other kinds of future careers. For instance, if you were to become your university’s vice chancellor, I am sure your proven leadership qualities and administrative experience would be important (as well as being a professor by then). Also, fighting for the future *is* important.

  5. Jill

    Why thanks, Patrik. And I sort of assume that if I stick around in academia for the next thirty odd years I’ll make full professor sooner or later. I suppose there’s no need to be impatient.

    Except, well, yeah, leveling up gets addictive 🙂

    I’m not really angry any more. More kind of planning. And looking forward to the weekend…

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Screenshot of a paragraph from a New York Times article published May 12, 2026. Text reads: "The price of tomatoes -tart bursts of flavor in salads and sandwiches — surged nearly 40 percent in April from a year ago on a combination of bad weather, high tariffs and climbing transportation costs."
AI STORIES

Genre glitches and unexpected promotional phrases as a sign of AI writing

A genre glitch is a characteristic of LLM-assisted writing where the text suddenly switches genre, typically inserting a short promotional phrase full of sensory details into an informational text. Genre glitches occur when a word in the generated text is heavily associated with a genre or context that is markedly […]

Top of a ransom note from Shinyhunters hacking group. Text reads: "SHINYHUNTERS rooting your systems since '19 ;) ShinyHunters has breached Instructure (again). Instead of contacting us to resolve it they ignored us and did some "security patches"."
Networked Politics University politics

UiB self-hosts the open source version of Canvas, so wasn’t affected by the breach

On May 1st Canvas announced a security breach, and then yesterday the system was hacked. The login page was replaced by a ransom note: if universities don’t pay up by 12 May, student data will be released. Here’s what the login page looked like yesterday: Way back in 2015, when […]

AI and algorithmic culture Networked Politics

AI-generated images, fascist aesthetics: Dieselbrølet and Heimatstrom

My German is pretty dodgy, so when I first saw Heimatstrom on Bluesky, shared by Roland Meyer, a professor of visual culture at Universität Zürich’s Digital Society Initiative, I misinterpreted it and thought it was a far-right campaign. But no, Heimatstrom is a group of left-wing environmentalists using fascist AI […]

Photo of a billboard ad at Oslo S train station showing a smiliing conductor and the text "Du må ikke sove. Joda, bare sov du."
AI STORIES

“Du må ikke sove”: a floating motif detached from its meaning (or: LLMs can write Norwegian but miss cultural references)

There’s a new ad for the train between Stavanger and Oslo in Norway that uses a line from Arnulf Øverland’s famous anti-fascist poem Du må ikke sove (“You must not sleep”). Du må ikke sove, you must not sleep, the ad says. And then it flips it, jovially, joda, bare […]

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.