ultrasound image of baby

You might have guessed from my fascination with babies, my sudden uptake of knitting and the slight bulge of my tummy: Scott and I are having a baby! We had the “big” ultrasound today, at the hospital, where they look to see whether the baby has four chambers in its heart and five toes on each foot and so on, and she does, she looks just absolutely perfect – and she’s (almost certainly) a girl!

She’s due on April 14. I’ve already started saying no to invitations to speak next semester, and I’m obviously not going to the Electronic Literature Organization’s excellent-looking conference next May (CFP deadline Nov 30). I’ll be on maternity leave from three weeks before April 14 and for the rest of 2008. After that, Scott will probably take paternity leave for a while – we get 54 weeks (at 80% pay) to share between us, which is great.

There, uh, might be a bit more blogging about baby and pregnancy websites and social networking and blogging for mums than usual. You guys’ll understand, right?


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

30 thoughts on “we’re having a baby!”

  1. steve

    Congratulations to all of you. That’s wonderful news.

  2. Clare

    Wonderful news, Jill, many congratulations!

  3. Anonymous

    Congratulations Jill and Scott! That’s such a great news!

  4. Thomas

    Congrats! The thought had crossed my mind, and it is great to have it confirmed. This makes it even more urgent to squeeze in a few network lunches before the big day! Your call:-)

  5. Deena Larsen

    Congrats on your wonderful new life!

  6. Lars

    Congratulations, Jill! Wonderful news!

  7. noah

    Many congratulations to you both!

    And I’m so glad you live somewhere with decent parental leave.

  8. Perla

    Congratulations Jill and Scott!

  9. Luca

    I forgot to sign my previous comment, I’m the anonymous #3.

  10. Oyvind

    Congratulations! Happy happy news.

  11. Jesper

    Wow, congratulations!

  12. Frank

    Gratulerer.
    Rart hun ikke blir svimmel. Ser ut som det gÂr fryktlig fort rundt i bildet.

  13. Matthew

    Congratulations to the both of you!

  14. Vika

    That is so, so good. Congratulations to your entire family.

    I have tickets for Chicago ñ maybe we should make plans to meet sometime. 🙂

  15. CW

    Congratulations to you both! 🙂

  16. FG

    Congrats!

  17. Martin GL

    Congratulations, Jill!

  18. Gro

    Congratulations! And the ultrasound pictures have certainly improved in quality since Mathias was pictured, back in the old days, in 1994.

  19. Gro

    Congratulations! The ultrasoundpictures has certainly raised in quality since Mathias was pictured, back in the old days, in 1994.

  20. William Patrick Wend

    Congrats! I was looking forward to seeing you guys at the ELO conference but that is exciting news! A good podcast I know of for tech & parenting is Jumping Monkeys, which is done by a few of the old Tech TV/Screen Savers people.

    we get 54 weeks (at 80% pay) to share between us

    That is amazing.

  21. Matt K.

    Wow! Congrats to you and Scott!

  22. M-H

    Hee hee. I read your Ravelry profile so it wan’t big news for me. Congratulations!

  23. Marina

    Oh my! Congratulations! Thatís such a wonderful news!

  24. Linn

    Yay! Excellent news! Gives me so much hope when brilliantly lovely people reproduce! All is not lost in the world!

  25. Karin

    Fantastic “news”! I must be a psychic, ’cause I was thinking about this already in June, at which time this little wonder was still in her planning stage? To be honest, I think the clue was your post of June the 17th, and “how fatherhood affects men physically”… Anyway, congratulations!!!

  26. Kevin T

    Hipp hipp! Gratulerer Jill & Scott!

  27. Jason

    What great news — congratulations!

  28. Toril

    Congratulations to you both! I’m so happy for you 🙂 and little girls are so precious!!!

  29. Jamie

    Congrats to you all! This is wonderful news. A new child and a neww sibling tooo!

    (I hope this reads okay, there’s something wrong with my font :()

  30. JoseAngel

    Great news, Jill! And xcellent about the babyblogging… you’ll no doubt develop the semiotics and narratology of baby blogging as you go along.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

screenshot of blogpost from sept 11, 2001, about blogger.com showing blog posts about the attacks
Networked Politics social media

25 years since September 11

I’ve been reading through my blog posts on September 11, 2001 and the days that followed. The things that stand out to me – in addition to the horror of the attack itself – are how massively we (or at least I) used the web to understand what was happening, […]

AI STORIES

AI-generated stories have longer endings than human stories

My colleague Jessica Witte has just shared a preprint where she compared the emotional arcs of the stories we generated using gpt-4o-mini to those of human-authored (pre-2022) stories from the subreddit r/WritingPrompts, conveniently gathered in this dataset. She found a distinct difference in the endings of the LLM-generated stories: both […]

How to peer review a paper in 2026

Dorothy Bishop, a psychologist, wrote a useful list of what reviewers need to look out now that so many papers are bad science that looks good thanks to LLMs. Read her whole blog post, she explains it well, but here’s a brief version because I’m pretty sure we’ll be needing […]

“So what if it was ChatGPT? It *could* have been true!”

I recently read a good article on the different kinds of truth a language model operates with by Luke Mann, Liam Magee and Vanicka Arora, Truth Machines: Synthesizing Veracity in AI Language Models, but despite its lovely typology of truths (consensus, correspondence, coherence and pragmatic) it doesn’t help me with […]

AI STORIES

AI shimmer and sparkle

I have this hunch that sparkles and glow and shimmer are somehow a point in the latent spaces of LLMs that have more connections than you would expect. Perhaps their connotation to magic and to the unknown matches some of the mystique of genAI? Or perhaps these words are used […]