Of course there’s been a lot of blogging about the Virginia Tech shootings (terrifying, heartbreaking), and about the use of social media and citizen reporting around them. Tama Leaver has an excellent post discussing intended versus unintended citizen journalism, and the ethics of mass media descending upon those who just happened to be there, and just happened to have written about it on LiveJournal or shot a video on their phone. From Bryce’s journal:

UPDATE (5:50):
This is ridiculous. I find myself getting excited because I’m on the news (Fox News recently shared the blog). Each time I hear something else I get a brief moment of selfish joy before I am stabbed in the heart, realizing that I deserve no credit and that lives are gone, destroyed, and in pain. What is the significance of all this? My postings are simply what I always do– except I left my thoughts for the public instead of just my friends. This run of emotions is hard to bear. I need to go for a walk– but of course, what good is that since everything is outside my door. There is no escaping. The chains have been tied to the door.

Lisbeth Klastrup notes the immense number of views a cellphone video of the shootings has received, although the quality is so bad you can barely see what’s going on, and wonders about the meaning of authenticity in news today.

Of course, this having happened at a college is particularly frightening for a university employee like me. Things like this don’t happen in Norway (touch wood) but if anything did happen here, I fervently hope our central administration would act more quickly than Virginia Tech’s did. One of Bryce’s first posts in his LiveJournal after the shootings was this:

THE FIRST SHOOTING TOOK PLACE AT AROUND 7AM. I WENT TO CLASS AT 9AM. THEY DIDN’T CLOSE CAMPUS UNTIL 10AM.

Mind you, it would be hard to close a whole campus.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

2 thoughts on “virginia school shootings and citizen reporting

  1. JoseAngel

    Well, I’d start worrying when someone goes on a shooting rampage in order to get more visits to his blog. Which is not an unlikely scenarioñ with the blog perhaps telling the plans in dvance etc. Touch Norwegian wood.

  2. […] There are several blog posts about the new kind of citizen journalism via blogs, social networks, etc. being manifested around the shootings at Virginia Tech. Mainstream media is (Lisbeth Klastrup writes) in its turn, appropriating this form of journalism and giving people tips on how to make more media-ready videos and such. […]

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

AI STORIES

AI-generated stories have longer endings than human stories

My colleague Jessica Witte has just shared a preprint where she compared the emotional arcs of the stories we generated using gpt-4o-mini to those of human-authored (pre-2022) stories from the subreddit r/WritingPrompts, conveniently gathered in this dataset. She found a distinct difference in the endings of the LLM-generated stories: both […]

How to peer review a paper in 2026

Dorothy Bishop, a psychologist, wrote a useful list of what reviewers need to look out now that so many papers are bad science that looks good thanks to LLMs. Read her whole blog post, she explains it well, but here’s a brief version because I’m pretty sure we’ll be needing […]

“So what if it was ChatGPT? It *could* have been true!”

I recently read a good article on the different kinds of truth a language model operates with by Luke Mann, Liam Magee and Vanicka Arora, Truth Machines: Synthesizing Veracity in AI Language Models, but despite its lovely typology of truths (consensus, correspondence, coherence and pragmatic) it doesn’t help me with […]

AI STORIES

AI shimmer and sparkle

I have this hunch that sparkles and glow and shimmer are somehow a point in the latent spaces of LLMs that have more connections than you would expect. Perhaps their connotation to magic and to the unknown matches some of the mystique of genAI? Or perhaps these words are used […]

Don’t do a systematic review if you’re in the humanities

This paper is a great example of why you probably shouldn’t use a systematic literature review for a theoretical and conceptual research question like “How does artificial intelligence affect the perception of authenticity and aura in art?” However, if you’re looking for an annotated list of 48 recent articles about […]