In a wonderful use of trackbacks, Mena Trott’s asking us to tell them how we use Moveable Type. Here’s how I use it – mostly for teaching, but also in my personal blog.

I have a personal installation with four blogs on it, only one of which is active. One is jill/txt, my personal blog, two of the others were for classes I taught in previous semesters, the last was just a test site. There are twenty-five users, none of which are active so I suppose I could delete them. Most of these had, at various times, access to the now-dormant teaching blogs. A few others I gave accounts so they could try out Moveable Type without actually installing it.

I also have an installation running with something like 70-80 users, around 60 of which are active. There’s a course blog for this semester’s web design and web aesthetics class, and individual blogs for each of the 54 students. There’s also a course blog for the class I taught last semester, which is dormant apart from the occasional comment on an old post. Most of the students from last semester have stopped blogging, but a few are still at it, so I don’t want to delete their blogs. A few students requested group blogs for group projects, which I gave them. Running an installation for that many students works flawlessly except that it was an utter pain to set up the individual accounts and blogs and connect them, and administering

Last spring I had each of 28 students in that year’s web design and web aesthetics class install their own version of Moveable Type. That was ambitious, but once done, they “owned” their means of production, and were capable of installing that kind of software, which was great.

In addition I’ve set up a few Moveable Type installations for other people, or to let someone test the system, or for the student representatives and so on. I don’t have access to these any more.
I don’t know how much the university would pay for Moveable Type. I doubt that I would have been able to integrate blogging into my teaching if it’d been costly for the university, at least not as a very junior faculty member – I snuck blogging in easily in part because I didn’t have to fight the budgets. There’s not a lot of money around for software, at least not in the humanities.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

1 Comment

  1. ClÈment Laberge

    Hi Jill,

    Sounds a lot like our usage of MT with children 10 to 12 years old (and great to know that SixApart are actualy looking for those type of uses…). For your information:

    First description (sept 2003):
    http://carnets.ixmedia.com/mario/archives/002425.html

    No new description up to now (for sure at the end of the classes), but people can see the childrens work there:

    http://cyberportfolio.ixmedia.com

    It wont be easy to find a good alternative to MT… we are working on that, but the “internal coherence ” (is that ok?) of the tool is unique I think… and for learning, that’s a big difference!

    P.S. Others classes are actually working with a similar model in New-Brunswick (Canada), as you can see there:

    http://cahm.elg.ca/portfolios/

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Screenshot of a paragraph from a New York Times article published May 12, 2026. Text reads: "The price of tomatoes -tart bursts of flavor in salads and sandwiches — surged nearly 40 percent in April from a year ago on a combination of bad weather, high tariffs and climbing transportation costs."
AI STORIES

Genre glitches and unexpected promotional phrases as a sign of AI writing

A genre glitch is a characteristic of LLM-assisted writing where the text suddenly switches genre, typically inserting a short promotional phrase full of sensory details into an informational text. Genre glitches occur when a word in the generated text is heavily associated with a genre or context that is markedly […]

Top of a ransom note from Shinyhunters hacking group. Text reads: "SHINYHUNTERS rooting your systems since '19 ;) ShinyHunters has breached Instructure (again). Instead of contacting us to resolve it they ignored us and did some "security patches"."
Networked Politics University politics

UiB self-hosts the open source version of Canvas, so wasn’t affected by the breach

On May 1st Canvas announced a security breach, and then yesterday the system was hacked. The login page was replaced by a ransom note: if universities don’t pay up by 12 May, student data will be released. Here’s what the login page looked like yesterday: Way back in 2015, when […]

AI and algorithmic culture Networked Politics

AI-generated images, fascist aesthetics: Dieselbrølet and Heimatstrom

My German is pretty dodgy, so when I first saw Heimatstrom on Bluesky, shared by Roland Meyer, a professor of visual culture at Universität Zürich’s Digital Society Initiative, I misinterpreted it and thought it was a far-right campaign. But no, Heimatstrom is a group of left-wing environmentalists using fascist AI […]

Photo of a billboard ad at Oslo S train station showing a smiliing conductor and the text "Du må ikke sove. Joda, bare sov du."
AI STORIES

“Du må ikke sove”: a floating motif detached from its meaning (or: LLMs can write Norwegian but miss cultural references)

There’s a new ad for the train between Stavanger and Oslo in Norway that uses a line from Arnulf Øverland’s famous anti-fascist poem Du må ikke sove (“You must not sleep”). Du må ikke sove, you must not sleep, the ad says. And then it flips it, jovially, joda, bare […]

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.