In a wonderful use of trackbacks, Mena Trott’s asking us to tell them how we use Moveable Type. Here’s how I use it – mostly for teaching, but also in my personal blog.

I have a personal installation with four blogs on it, only one of which is active. One is jill/txt, my personal blog, two of the others were for classes I taught in previous semesters, the last was just a test site. There are twenty-five users, none of which are active so I suppose I could delete them. Most of these had, at various times, access to the now-dormant teaching blogs. A few others I gave accounts so they could try out Moveable Type without actually installing it.

I also have an installation running with something like 70-80 users, around 60 of which are active. There’s a course blog for this semester’s web design and web aesthetics class, and individual blogs for each of the 54 students. There’s also a course blog for the class I taught last semester, which is dormant apart from the occasional comment on an old post. Most of the students from last semester have stopped blogging, but a few are still at it, so I don’t want to delete their blogs. A few students requested group blogs for group projects, which I gave them. Running an installation for that many students works flawlessly except that it was an utter pain to set up the individual accounts and blogs and connect them, and administering

Last spring I had each of 28 students in that year’s web design and web aesthetics class install their own version of Moveable Type. That was ambitious, but once done, they “owned” their means of production, and were capable of installing that kind of software, which was great.

In addition I’ve set up a few Moveable Type installations for other people, or to let someone test the system, or for the student representatives and so on. I don’t have access to these any more.
I don’t know how much the university would pay for Moveable Type. I doubt that I would have been able to integrate blogging into my teaching if it’d been costly for the university, at least not as a very junior faculty member – I snuck blogging in easily in part because I didn’t have to fight the budgets. There’s not a lot of money around for software, at least not in the humanities.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

1 Comment

  1. ClÈment Laberge

    Hi Jill,

    Sounds a lot like our usage of MT with children 10 to 12 years old (and great to know that SixApart are actualy looking for those type of uses…). For your information:

    First description (sept 2003):
    http://carnets.ixmedia.com/mario/archives/002425.html

    No new description up to now (for sure at the end of the classes), but people can see the childrens work there:

    http://cyberportfolio.ixmedia.com

    It wont be easy to find a good alternative to MT… we are working on that, but the “internal coherence ” (is that ok?) of the tool is unique I think… and for learning, that’s a big difference!

    P.S. Others classes are actually working with a similar model in New-Brunswick (Canada), as you can see there:

    http://cahm.elg.ca/portfolios/

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

AI STORIES

AI-generated stories have longer endings than human stories

My colleague Jessica Witte has just shared a preprint where she compared the emotional arcs of the stories we generated using gpt-4o-mini to those of human-authored (pre-2022) stories from the subreddit r/WritingPrompts, conveniently gathered in this dataset. She found a distinct difference in the endings of the LLM-generated stories: both […]

How to peer review a paper in 2026

Dorothy Bishop, a psychologist, wrote a useful list of what reviewers need to look out now that so many papers are bad science that looks good thanks to LLMs. Read her whole blog post, she explains it well, but here’s a brief version because I’m pretty sure we’ll be needing […]

“So what if it was ChatGPT? It *could* have been true!”

I recently read a good article on the different kinds of truth a language model operates with by Luke Mann, Liam Magee and Vanicka Arora, Truth Machines: Synthesizing Veracity in AI Language Models, but despite its lovely typology of truths (consensus, correspondence, coherence and pragmatic) it doesn’t help me with […]

AI STORIES

AI shimmer and sparkle

I have this hunch that sparkles and glow and shimmer are somehow a point in the latent spaces of LLMs that have more connections than you would expect. Perhaps their connotation to magic and to the unknown matches some of the mystique of genAI? Or perhaps these words are used […]

Don’t do a systematic review if you’re in the humanities

This paper is a great example of why you probably shouldn’t use a systematic literature review for a theoretical and conceptual research question like “How does artificial intelligence affect the perception of authenticity and aura in art?” However, if you’re looking for an annotated list of 48 recent articles about […]