I was eighteen the last time I was single. My girlfriends are all neatly coupled off now, but their reactions to my recently acquired single status speak volumes of what might lie underneath the clean surfaces of their lives.

—Whatever you do, don’t go for a Bergener next time. Men here are disgusting.
—How about another Australian? They’re much more friendly than Norwegians.
—Stick closer to home, next time, won’t you? I hate it when you travel.
—You’re so lucky. If I were single I would never, ever live with a man again.
—I think you should get yourself a tall, blond bloke who lives round the corner. Have you really not met anyone yet?

and the one that I find the most hilarious of all:

—Oh, Jill, this is so exciting! I can’t wait to hear what you do next! Tell me exactly what happened! Let’s go dancing tonight!

Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

8 thoughts on “untidy reactions

  1. jon

    I’ve often noticed that when one relationship breaks up in a close-knit group thre’s a kind of knock-on effect. Some people are really supportive but others freeze you out. It’s almost like they are afraid your “failure” is a sign of what is to come for them. Other couples start to reevaluate their own relationships and you can get pushed to the side.
    I got divorced about 2.5 years ago and it really felt like some of my friends around me didn’t give a damn. (No one suggested going dancing!) Suffice to say they’re no longer close friends.

  2. Jill

    I think that a lot of people in couples feel threatened by breakups and divorce. Other people in couples are almost frighteningly excited by them – and it doesn’t take much to assume that they’re the people who are less than content in their relationships.

    And there are a lot of people who just have no idea how to react or how tough it is to go through a divorce or breakup.

  3. Rorschach

    That or it forces a self (relationship) evaluation. Two people who you thought were getting along just fine, weren’t. This is a very uncomfortable thing for a lot of people.

    Another problem is the whole point of reference thing. What do you say to someone who has just had their heart ripped out? “Uh, golly. I’m sorry to hear it.” It sounds trite and insubstantial. “I know what your going through and it’ll get better.” Bull shit. No one has any idea what your going through and is probably worse than the first one.

    You wrote a piece a while back on what *not* to say to someone who had a miscarriage. Any hints for relationships?

  4. Jill

    Actually the people around me have been much more helpful and supportive around the breakup than they were (were able to be, I think) about the miscarriages I had before my daughter was born. I think that more people have experienced breakups of some kind, and I think that breakups are just more visible and so we handle them better.

    Noone’s said anything really awful. My male friends mostly stay carefully away from the subject, but several of these have been very supportive in other, indirect ways: asking me to the movies, or dropping by or ringing, and sort of being around in a pleasant unchallenging way. Once I realised that that was actually a male way of being really supportive and caring I’ve appreciated it a lot. Girlfriends ask now and then. One of my girlfriends is obnoxiously curious, it’s like I’m a soap opera, but that’s just the way she is.

    In fact the “it’ll get better” line is one of my favourites. I love hearing the stories of people who’ve dealt with difficult breakups and who have gotten through it and who are actually happier than they had been before. There are a lot of those stories, and you know, if that many other people have survived and found better lives, it seems likely I will too, wouldn’t you agree?

  5. Elin

    I agree:-) And you know why. Breakups are actually almost with no exceptions the best thing that could happen to you – in retrospect~!

  6. Elin

    – and by the way, while we talk about untidy reactions.. my mum deserve a high grade for this one:

    “Oh well. I think it is time you realize that you are not relationship material. You’re far too independent. Give up the men and stop dating.”

    Yes – she was absolutely serious!

  7. mcb

    When I broke up with my last partner I left the house we were sharing with a change of underwear and little else. It was a terrible time, but I am soooooo much happier now and I am so thankful that it ended when it did. It’s amazing how a little time gives you some perspective. I thought I was going to be miserable forever. But in 6 months I was in a much better relationship and was generally much happier as well.
    So, it does get better, I fervently believe it!

  8. Jill

    Ooh, thanks, girls! And Elin, I think you should cast someone with your mum’s response as the villian in a story sometime…

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Screenshot of a paragraph from a New York Times article published May 12, 2026. Text reads: "The price of tomatoes -tart bursts of flavor in salads and sandwiches — surged nearly 40 percent in April from a year ago on a combination of bad weather, high tariffs and climbing transportation costs."
AI STORIES

Genre glitches and unexpected promotional phrases as a sign of AI writing

A genre glitch is a characteristic of LLM-assisted writing where the text suddenly switches genre, typically inserting a short promotional phrase full of sensory details into an informational text. Genre glitches occur when a word in the generated text is heavily associated with a genre or context that is markedly […]

Top of a ransom note from Shinyhunters hacking group. Text reads: "SHINYHUNTERS rooting your systems since '19 ;) ShinyHunters has breached Instructure (again). Instead of contacting us to resolve it they ignored us and did some "security patches"."
Networked Politics University politics

UiB self-hosts the open source version of Canvas, so wasn’t affected by the breach

On May 1st Canvas announced a security breach, and then yesterday the system was hacked. The login page was replaced by a ransom note: if universities don’t pay up by 12 May, student data will be released. Here’s what the login page looked like yesterday: Way back in 2015, when […]

AI and algorithmic culture Networked Politics

AI-generated images, fascist aesthetics: Dieselbrølet and Heimatstrom

My German is pretty dodgy, so when I first saw Heimatstrom on Bluesky, shared by Roland Meyer, a professor of visual culture at Universität Zürich’s Digital Society Initiative, I misinterpreted it and thought it was a far-right campaign. But no, Heimatstrom is a group of left-wing environmentalists using fascist AI […]

Photo of a billboard ad at Oslo S train station showing a smiliing conductor and the text "Du må ikke sove. Joda, bare sov du."
AI STORIES

“Du må ikke sove”: a floating motif detached from its meaning (or: LLMs can write Norwegian but miss cultural references)

There’s a new ad for the train between Stavanger and Oslo in Norway that uses a line from Arnulf Øverland’s famous anti-fascist poem Du må ikke sove (“You must not sleep”). Du må ikke sove, you must not sleep, the ad says. And then it flips it, jovially, joda, bare […]

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.