Survived part one: I officially passed my trial lecture. There were no questions, just a strange sort of end, but Marie-Laure said afterwards that she liked the golems 🙂 I even had a nice dinner with Lisbeth, Torill, Jesper and Marie-Laure, before shooting off home to work while they, the lucky things, have another drink or two. My wonderful mother and friends have been setting the table and so on in preparation for tomorrow’s dinner. And now I’m going to have a cup of tea, some chocolate, and I’m going to sit down and make quite sure I know how to respond to the critical points in the committee’s report.

Oh, what the trial lecture turned out to be about? Well, I talked about the Hindu and digital origins of the word avatar, and argued that avatars, as projections of the user into another world, are useful concepts in thinking about represented worlds that have clear boundaries from our own, actual world. I showed how the user mirrors the characters in Magic-tree.com, and how those characters aren’t really avatars; how I don’t even really identify with the characters whose movements I’m enacting. Then I described the myth of the golem (not a projection into another world but an animated non-human in this world) and read a bit from Fuentes’s Aura (search for “ritual” inside the book, that’s the page I read), and proposed that when there are less clear boundaries between actual and represented world it might be more useful to think about the relationship between user and fictional characters as similar to that between a golem and its creator.

I am dying to get my hands on Norbert Wiener’s God and Golem, Inc. The weirdest thing about writing a paper on a set topic in only two weeks is that you get all these good ideas that don’t quite have time to unfold. And you discover potentially fascinating connections and literature the day before your deadline.

Tomorrow: the defence itself. The disputas. Tomorrow evening: the party. Then it’ll be over.

5 thoughts on “trial lecture’s done

  1. Elin

    Gratulerer!! I’m so excited to hear about tomorrow – best of luck – go go go!
    🙂

  2. Susana

    what? i just lost my post, I just wanted to scream: excellent! I wish I was there too! grrr, evil sas points people! anyway, lots of luck and good spirits for tomorrow, I am sure you will dazzle them all.

  3. nick

    Congrats! and good luck on the defense tomorrow.

  4. Deena

    Go get them!

    We knew you could do it 🙂

  5. Rorschach

    On golems:

    Aren’t cybernetic devices/robots golems then? They do represent animated non-humans in this world. If we have representations in the computer world, isn’t it fitting that they have the same? I’m guessing that some day they’ll be able to download (upload?) an AI into a brain; that would definitely constitute a golem by your definition.

    And btw, congratulations on finishing your lecture/defense.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Machine Vision

Cultural Representations of Machine Vision: An Experimental Mixed Methods Workshop

Call for submissions to a workshop, Bergen, Norway
Workshop dates: 15-17 August 2022
Proposals due: 15 June

The Machine Vision in Everyday Life project invites proposals for an interdisciplinary workshop using qualitative approaches and digital methods to analyse how machine vision is represented in art, science fiction, games, social media and other forms of cultural and aesthetic expression.