WordPress was far easier to install than Movable Type was, and it has built in spam blacklists and easier-looking comment management, and a nice interface, but I don’t know php so editing the templates I find that I’m spending a lot of time squinting so I only see the familiar codes and not those lines of php with all the disconcerting question marks.

To change the URLs of my permalinks I have to “use mod_rewrite” which is no doubt basic for a programmer and I know I’ll be able to google my way to doing it, whatever it is, in time, but I’ve gotta say Movable Type is closer to HTML and familiar pastures.

I was getting a teeny bit sick of having to delete comments every single time I took a look at my blog, though. I’m not convinced WordPress’ll have better spam control, but simply changing systems should confuse the evil spammers for a while, anyway. I thought of using Tinderbox again. Now that Haloscan offers both comments and trackbacks I wouldn’t have to give up my networkedness. But I do like having the comments in my own control. It’s so cool that I could just import all the posts, comments and trackbacks from Movable Type, no problem!

I’ll try WordPress for a while. Maybe I’ll return to Movable Type, or Tinderbox, or another platform in a while. Trying out different systems is good. Like stretching. Keeps you flexible.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

5 thoughts on “switching – pros and cons

  1. steve

    I found WordPress a bit intimidating. That’s part of why I’ve settled on Texpattern — something about the interface just feels intuitive to me. With WordPress I felt like I was struggling to figure things out, whereas Textpattern made sense right out of the box. However, I know other people have had the opposite experience. There’s an indefinable element to understanding a piece of software, like trying to explain why one tennis racket is more comfortable for your swing than another.

  2. LiL

    I’m running my main blog on MT, the first time I tried WordPress I was intimidated by what I now think was my unfamiliarity with open-sourceness. But after a while, I tried it again and now I really like it. WordPress feels really pure and transparent and hence manageable to me – though I’m only running a simple group of research blogs on it at this time, mainly for personal reference. So commenting is less of an issue and I certainly haven’t had to import anything yet. I like the link organization features a lot, and the categories as well. And just that WordPress has such a tiny core and generates pages on the fly, saving on disc space. I wonder how this will affect bandwidth usage for an oft-read blog like yours though.

  3. tormodh

    Since trackbacks doesn’t show (as far as I can see) – here’s a quick (and dirty) rundown on mod_rewrite.

  4. scott

    no pics are showing up for me here though — is that intentional or is that an unresolved wordpress thing?

  5. Elin

    I’ve come to really really love Tinderbox (remember the time years back where I just couldn’t make sense of it for my bare life? Gulp!) Now that I can, I am redesigning my blog in the t-box. But you’re right, trying out lots of different systems is fun:-) I think Jesper’s blog is done with wordpress?
    E.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

AI STORIES

AI-generated stories have longer endings than human stories

My colleague Jessica Witte has just shared a preprint where she compared the emotional arcs of the stories we generated using gpt-4o-mini to those of human-authored (pre-2022) stories from the subreddit r/WritingPrompts, conveniently gathered in this dataset. She found a distinct difference in the endings of the LLM-generated stories: both […]

How to peer review a paper in 2026

Dorothy Bishop, a psychologist, wrote a useful list of what reviewers need to look out now that so many papers are bad science that looks good thanks to LLMs. Read her whole blog post, she explains it well, but here’s a brief version because I’m pretty sure we’ll be needing […]

“So what if it was ChatGPT? It *could* have been true!”

I recently read a good article on the different kinds of truth a language model operates with by Luke Mann, Liam Magee and Vanicka Arora, Truth Machines: Synthesizing Veracity in AI Language Models, but despite its lovely typology of truths (consensus, correspondence, coherence and pragmatic) it doesn’t help me with […]

AI STORIES

AI shimmer and sparkle

I have this hunch that sparkles and glow and shimmer are somehow a point in the latent spaces of LLMs that have more connections than you would expect. Perhaps their connotation to magic and to the unknown matches some of the mystique of genAI? Or perhaps these words are used […]

Don’t do a systematic review if you’re in the humanities

This paper is a great example of why you probably shouldn’t use a systematic literature review for a theoretical and conceptual research question like “How does artificial intelligence affect the perception of authenticity and aura in art?” However, if you’re looking for an annotated list of 48 recent articles about […]