One thing I’ve really liked in the student weblogs I’ve been grading is that there are a lot of posts that are really useful. It’s so different from exams where only the examiners are ever going to see all the work students have done. For instance, a colour blind student teaches other students and readers how to design sites that can be read by colour blind people (you’ll have more colour blind readers than readers using Opera or Netscape or needing websafe colours or any of those other things we fret about), another student explains how to make skins for your blog, one explains how to use php to join up separate html files. There are lots of comments from other students on the blogs, and questions are asked and answered and there are links to and fro and they’ve just done a really impressive job.

Here are some things I did right, I reckon, in the blogging section of the course:

  • Required different kinds of blog post in the final portfolio: an analysis of a website, a reflective/theoretical post about the web and communication, a technical post (which generated a lot of the teaching posts) and an evaluation of another student’s site.
  • Did a fair amount of blogging in class.
  • Ditto for comments and linking to each other’s blogs.

Of course there are things I could have done better, too:

  • Specified just what, exactly, I expected, much earlier in the semester.
  • Done more in-class blogging earlier.
  • Worked out a less traumatising way of starting blogging than having each student install MoveableType themselves the first week of semester. I don’t know how I’ll do that next spring. It’s excellent that they have control of their own blogs, and MoveableType has a lot of good features that we’ve used since, but it was a really rough way to start the semester and the many students who had problems certainly didn’t feel very at ease with their blogs. Little confidence was gained.
  • Done something about the curriculum – I didn’t use it very well. However, students have found and read and written about a lot of other material themselves, and that’s good. Perhaps more of the curriculum can be self-defined by students next time round.

5 thoughts on “students teaching with blogs

  1. JonathanSmith

    So, should there be blogs of student evaluations of faculty?

  2. Jill

    I hate those public lists of the worst lecturers that students sometimes publish – much better, I think, if there are lots of opportunities in class for students and teachers to give each other feedback on how the relationship between them is working. I can’t remember any of my students posting evaluations of my teaching, exactly, on their blogs, but I could often tell when something had worked well by the number of posts related to that class – that shows that whatever we did inspired the students to think more about it themselves. Noone posted negative comments (except about blogging in general) but then they wouldn’t give they’re being graded on it.

    I wouldn’t mind reading students more explicit reactions to my teaching in their blogs, anyway. Well, not unless they ONLY wrote bad things 🙂

  3. pericat

    (I keep reading “blogging” as “hugging”. Hm.)

    The colour-blind site is gorgeous.

  4. Tuttle SVC

    Reflections on Using Blogs in a Class
    jill/txt has a nice post today, students teaching with blogs, recapping her experiences using weblogs with students.

  5. Words' End

    I know, so much news to write up, and all I want to do is post a link?? How lame.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Triple book talk: Watch James Dobson, Jussi Parikka and me discuss our 2023 books

Thanks to everyone who came to the triple book talk of three recent books on machine vision by James Dobson, Jussi Parikka and me, and thanks for excellent questions. Several people have emailed to asked if we recorded it, and yes we did! Here you go! James and Jussi’s books […]

Image on a black background of a human hand holding a graphic showing the word AI with a blue circuit board pattern inside surrounded by blurred blue and yellow dots and a concentric circular blue design.
AI and algorithmic culture Machine Vision

Four visual registers for imaginaries of machine vision

I’m thrilled to announce another publication from our European Research Council (ERC)-funded research project on Machine Vision: Gabriele de Setaand Anya Shchetvina‘s paper analysing how Chinese AI companies visually present machine vision technologies. They find that the Chinese machine vision imaginary is global, blue and competitive.  De Seta, Gabriele, and Anya Shchetvina. “Imagining Machine […]

Do people flock to talks about ChatGPT because they are scared?

Whenever I give talks about ChatGPT and LLMs, whether to ninth graders, businesses or journalists, I meet people who are hungry for information, who really want to understand this new technology. I’ve interpreted this as interest and a need to understand – but yesterday, Eirik Solheim said that every time […]