Occasionally I get a spam comment that’s simply beautiful. This is poetry, and I don’t have the heart to relegate it to the spam bin, but if I publish it as a comment I’d approve the emailer and risk future bad comments being automatically approved…. So I took out the URL the commenter was trying to sell and I’m posting it here, instead.

Submitted on 2012/02/09 at 17:27
seldom leave a response|I seldom write} responses|I usually do not write} a ton of} responses|I usually do not leave a response|I usually do not write} a leave a response}, however looked at a few of the|a few of the|a bunch of} responses|after browsing} a few of the|a few of the|a bunch of} responses|I read|glanced} through} a few responses|after reading a few of the|a few of the|a bunch of} responses|I looked at a few of the|a few of the|a bunch of} responses|after reading through a few of the|a few of the|a bunch of} responses} on %BLOGTITLE%. I actually do have a few questions|a couple of questions|2 questions} for you do not mind|if it’s okay}. Could it be only me or give the impression like} a few of these responses appear as if they are written by brain dead folks? :-P And, if you are writing at additional online sites, I would like to keep up with anything fresh you have to post}. Would you make a list of every one of all your social community sites like your linkedin profile, Facebook page or twitter feed?|I {write} a leave a response|drop a leave a response|leave a response} when I like a article on a blog|site|website} or if I have something to contribute to the conversation. Usually it’s triggered by the fire displayed in the article I looked at. And after this article %BLOGTITLE%. I was actually moved|was actually excited} enough to {drop|write}|post} a {thought|{comment|leave a responsea response}} ;) I actually do have a few questions|a couple of questions|2 questions} for you {if you usually do not mind|if it’s okay}. Could it be only me or give the impression like} a few of these responses appear as if they are written by brain dead folks? :-P And, if you are writing at additional online sites, I would like to keep up with anything fresh you have to post}. Would you make a list every one of all your shared sites like your linkedin profile, Facebook page or twitter feed?|seldom leave a response|I seldom write} responses|I usually do not write} a ton of} responses}, however i did a few searching and wound up here %BLOGTITLE%. And I actually do have a few questions|a couple of questions|2 questions} for you {if you usually do not mind|if it’s allright}. Could it be only me or does it look like a few of these responses appear as if they are written by brain dead folks? :-P And, if you are writing at additional online sites, I would like to keep up with everything fresh you have to post. Would you make a list of every one of all your shared sites like your linkedin profile, Facebook page or twitter feed?|think that everything composed|said|published}|I think that everything composed|said|published}|I think that everything composed|said|published}|I think that everything composed|said|published}|Everything composed|said|published}} was actually very reasonable|made a bunch of sense}. However, think on this,} suppose you create a awesome post title}?|added a little information?|composed a catchier post title?} am not suggesting your information is not solid.|I am not suggesting your information is not solid|I mean, I don’t wish to tell you how to run your website}, however suppose you added {a post title|something|a post title}} folk’s attention?|to possibly grab folk’s attention?|that makes people desire more?} I mean %BLOGTITLE% is kinda boring. You should glance at Yahoo’s front page and note how they create} article titles to grab people to open the links. You might try adding a video or a picture or two to grab people excited about everything’ve got to say. In my opinion, it would make your {posts|website} a little bit more interesting.}

Do you think this is completely automatically generated, or hand-crafted?


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

3 thoughts on “Spam poetry

  1. Megs

    That is flippin crazy, yet utterly fun. I wish my spam was nearly as entertaining. 🙂

  2. Glenn Friesen

    Yes, indeed — that’s some poetic spam!

    It looks like the spammer intended for the spam to be “spun” — although it looks like their spam spinning software is broken… http://bit.ly/vOA4Av

  3. Jean Paul

    Right, u have the reason, recently i was reading the comments of my blog getting a similar poetic comment, hahaha.
    Take care!!

    “Could it be just me or does it give the impression like some of the remarks look like they are written by brain dead folks? And, if you are posting at additional sites, I’d like to keep up with anything fresh you have to post. Could you make a list every one of all your social pages like your linkedin profile, Facebook page or twitter feed?”

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Screenshot of a paragraph from a New York Times article published May 12, 2026. Text reads: "The price of tomatoes -tart bursts of flavor in salads and sandwiches — surged nearly 40 percent in April from a year ago on a combination of bad weather, high tariffs and climbing transportation costs."
AI STORIES

Genre glitches and unexpected promotional phrases as a sign of AI writing

A genre glitch is a characteristic of LLM-assisted writing where the text suddenly switches genre, typically inserting a short promotional phrase full of sensory details into an informational text. Genre glitches occur when a word in the generated text is heavily associated with a genre or context that is markedly […]

Top of a ransom note from Shinyhunters hacking group. Text reads: "SHINYHUNTERS rooting your systems since '19 ;) ShinyHunters has breached Instructure (again). Instead of contacting us to resolve it they ignored us and did some "security patches"."
Networked Politics University politics

UiB self-hosts the open source version of Canvas, so wasn’t affected by the breach

On May 1st Canvas announced a security breach, and then yesterday the system was hacked. The login page was replaced by a ransom note: if universities don’t pay up by 12 May, student data will be released. Here’s what the login page looked like yesterday: Way back in 2015, when […]

AI and algorithmic culture Networked Politics

AI-generated images, fascist aesthetics: Dieselbrølet and Heimatstrom

My German is pretty dodgy, so when I first saw Heimatstrom on Bluesky, shared by Roland Meyer, a professor of visual culture at Universität Zürich’s Digital Society Initiative, I misinterpreted it and thought it was a far-right campaign. But no, Heimatstrom is a group of left-wing environmentalists using fascist AI […]

Photo of a billboard ad at Oslo S train station showing a smiliing conductor and the text "Du må ikke sove. Joda, bare sov du."
AI STORIES

“Du må ikke sove”: a floating motif detached from its meaning (or: LLMs can write Norwegian but miss cultural references)

There’s a new ad for the train between Stavanger and Oslo in Norway that uses a line from Arnulf Øverland’s famous anti-fascist poem Du må ikke sove (“You must not sleep”). Du må ikke sove, you must not sleep, the ad says. And then it flips it, jovially, joda, bare […]

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.