I’m currently obsessed with storytelling in Snapchat, as you may have gleaned from my last post, and so I’ve decided to post daily Snapchat Stories about my research Monday-Friday throughout this month. Add me (I’m jilltxt) to view my stories as I post them! Here are my first three, each using slightly different narrative techniques.

Narratively, I like the first and second stories the best. The first really uses the medium as it’s about selfie lenses, but not every story can do that.

In the second one, which is a kind of book review, I actually go to the library and look for some of the books discussed in the book I review, and I think the walk-and-talk thing works well in Snapchat stories. That’s a pretty common trope for successful Snapchatters (e.g. danthedirector, tornsuits, djkhaled – OK, he usually uses his waterski rather than his legs but same idea) and having tried it, I can see why. I also feel less stilted and stiff speaking to my phone while walking than just sitting up and down.

For the third story I wanted to try snapping an event, so made a story about a research seminar in Kristine Jørgensen’s Games and Transgressive Aesthetics project. I think the walking to the seminar and explaining what it’s about works well, and I like getting a couple of the principal actors to explain very briefly what they do, but I’m not sure whether there is a good way to snap from a research presentation. It’s hard to get exactly the right 10 second soundbite from a presentation. The summary at the end works pretty well though I think. And I like silly stuff like the faceswap.

I’ve been somewhat surprised that the time use for creating these videos really isn’t greater than writing a blog post. In many ways it’s quicker, because you can’t go back and edit once you’ve posted things. So you don’t have the second-guessing and the I’ll-just-save-this-as-a-draft-and-never-return-to-it that I tend to end up with in blogging.

Obviously I’ve spent some time thinking about this and exploring Snapchat over the last couple of weeks, but the actual stories haven’t taken much time to create. I storyboarded the first one on the plane (about 30 minutes work?) and certainly thought about the topic a lot while playing with Snapchat, and of course it draws from my earlier work. Actually creating the video first took me about an hour and a half. The second video took just over an hour, which included the time to walk down to the library (15 mins) which was on my way home anyway. The third took no extra time in the sense that it was entirely created around a research seminar I was going to in any case. I recorded a bit on my way to the seminar, a bit at the seminar, and a bit walking from the seminar to a coffee shop for a bit of writing before heading off to pick up the kids from school.

Another issue is that these are supposed to be transient, right, like television and radio were before the internet. But I’m saving my stories because I don’t want to put all that work into this and have it disappear. So what does that do to the medium?

I also notice that the way I’m using Snapchat could have been made for television. There’s nothing really narratively new in these (except maybe the selfie lenses). But I never would have filmed and edited a video like this without using Snapchat. I would have thought of it as too much work and also as something unachievable for me because I’m not a video producer. On Snapchat it’s just add one short clip after another and oh, look, it turns into a video.

I’ll post more another day about how I’m seeing other researchers use Snapchat – in quite different ways – but now it’s time to get the kids up for school. Oh jetlag–I woke at 5 this morning and am sure I’ll be zonked by dinner time… jilltxt-on-snapchat


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

6 thoughts on “Snapchat Research Stories: A Daily Challenge for April

  1. Per Arne Godejord

    Hi,

    As usual, a very interesting post. I have never thought about using Snapchat this way. As for the less stilted and stiff speaking to the phone while walking, I agree.

    Back in 2007, I had some lectures at a Polish university, as well as having online students back home in Norway. Trying to reach their “hearts and minds”, I made a couple of videos discussing various topics while walking in the Polish woods, chopping wood etc. and it gave the videos a much more “conversational” touch. I would definitely recommend such an approach instead of the sitting stiff in a chair type of videos 🙂

    Looking forward to your next post!

    Best regards
    Per Arne Godejord

  2. Tama

    So, I was inspired and tried out a SnapStory, and it didn’t work, but I did learn a lot by it not working. I tried to do a reaction to the Rogue One (Star Wars) trailer, but just using images and text. Which is okay when it’s in Snapchat and you can manually tab through once you’re read the text, but is frustrating when it’s converted to a video file. And then I was worried no one would look at the video, so picked awful audio from YouTube’s library. A litany of how *not* to approach Snapchat for storytelling! LOL

    1. Jill

      OK, I watched it on Snapchat, and I thought it worked really well there. But yeah, as YouTube video it’s uh, let’s just say less awesome… Definitely something to think about if we’re wanting to make Snapchat stories that both work on Snapchat and that can be saved for reuse elsewhere.

      Do you think you’ll do more of these?

      1. Tama

        I’ll probably try another one next week – my university has been the centre of a big public streetart festival and there are about 20 new murals across campus, so I thought a little narrated tour of my favourites might work well.
        In terms of the format, it reminded of how giving media interviews works. When I’m doing media interviews, I usually end up giving somewhere between 5 and 10 minutes’ worth of answers, knowing that the few quotes that’ll be used are usually in chunks that’d usually fit Snapchat’s 10 second limit. And the challenge is always to make sure you deliver quotes that summarize what you do want reported … and never say anything that can be decontextualized and sound awful in one of those 10 second chunks.

        For me, while I’m comfortable (mostly) with the process of letting journalists work out which bits of my train of thought are most useful to share, I find having to figure out what I want to say in 10-second segments frustrating. I tried to do that Star Wars story with my talking head to start with and kept getting cut off, so gave up and used the images with text, instead.

        So, I can see a walking tour of art being a good use, but I doubt I’ll default to Snapchat stories as a regular academic storytelling channel.

        (That said, I’d love to experiment in class with getting students to convey key ideas in small chunks: it’d probably be great to refine their clarity of expression!)

  3. Tama

    Btw, are you planning on going to AoIR in Berlin this year? If so, perhaps you should lead a Telling Scholarly Stories with Social Media preconference thing (or more informal session)? The Selfies preconf remains one of my favourite conference events ever, and it’d be awesome to capture a similar level of energy around social media storytelling experimentation! 🙂

    1. Jill

      That’s a great idea except that it’s too late to submit a proposal. We could definitely do an informal thing, though. I would love to. It could be really interesting having a bunch of people trying to snap the conference.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Screenshot of a paragraph from a New York Times article published May 12, 2026. Text reads: "The price of tomatoes -tart bursts of flavor in salads and sandwiches — surged nearly 40 percent in April from a year ago on a combination of bad weather, high tariffs and climbing transportation costs."
AI STORIES

Genre glitches and unexpected promotional phrases as a sign of AI writing

A genre glitch is a characteristic of LLM-assisted writing where the text suddenly switches genre, typically inserting a short promotional phrase full of sensory details into an informational text. Genre glitches occur when a word in the generated text is heavily associated with a genre or context that is markedly […]

Top of a ransom note from Shinyhunters hacking group. Text reads: "SHINYHUNTERS rooting your systems since '19 ;) ShinyHunters has breached Instructure (again). Instead of contacting us to resolve it they ignored us and did some "security patches"."
Networked Politics University politics

UiB self-hosts the open source version of Canvas, so wasn’t affected by the breach

On May 1st Canvas announced a security breach, and then yesterday the system was hacked. The login page was replaced by a ransom note: if universities don’t pay up by 12 May, student data will be released. Here’s what the login page looked like yesterday: Way back in 2015, when […]

AI and algorithmic culture Networked Politics

AI-generated images, fascist aesthetics: Dieselbrølet and Heimatstrom

My German is pretty dodgy, so when I first saw Heimatstrom on Bluesky, shared by Roland Meyer, a professor of visual culture at Universität Zürich’s Digital Society Initiative, I misinterpreted it and thought it was a far-right campaign. But no, Heimatstrom is a group of left-wing environmentalists using fascist AI […]

Photo of a billboard ad at Oslo S train station showing a smiliing conductor and the text "Du må ikke sove. Joda, bare sov du."
AI STORIES

“Du må ikke sove”: a floating motif detached from its meaning (or: LLMs can write Norwegian but miss cultural references)

There’s a new ad for the train between Stavanger and Oslo in Norway that uses a line from Arnulf Øverland’s famous anti-fascist poem Du må ikke sove (“You must not sleep”). Du må ikke sove, you must not sleep, the ad says. And then it flips it, jovially, joda, bare […]

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.