I though Amnesty’s SMS appeals thing sounded cool, so I signed up. But how on earth can this work? The messages are so innane, so totally untrustworthy in their simplicity, I mean, look at today’s:

Frances Newton skal henrettes i Texas 1. desember. Hun hevder hun er uskyldig. Stans henrettelsen! Send: APPELL <ditt navn> til 1960 n?•! Les mer: www.amnesty.no (Frances Newton is to be executed in Texas on December 1. She claims she’s innocent. Stop the execution! Send: APPEAL <your name> to 1960 now! Read more: www.amnesty.no)

Screenshot of Amnesty.no's page about Frances NewtonThe first times I sent the appeal, paying Amnesty three kroner for the message, not really knowing how my text message supposedly changes things. But getting one of these every week I’ve become callous. The brevity of the claim is offensive: she claims to be innocent? I think the death penalty is barbaric, but how is sending a text message going to stop that? Usually I’m out somewhere and I don’t follow the link they give you. Today I’m home sick so I did, and sure enough, Frances Newton is (apparently) going to be executed based on hearsay and not on solid evidence, she didn’t have appropriate legal representation, this is quite probably an injustice, a murder of justice. But the SMS form leaves me cold, critical, unable to connect with this.

I think Amnesty has made at least one crucial mistake: they send out the SMSes with no sender. So while my phone usually tells me “Message from Beatrice” or, if the sender’s not in my address book, “Message from +4795021453” the messages from Amnesty say “Message from . .” Now would you trust that? I mean, rationally, I know I’ve signed up, I do have a lot of respect for Amnesty, I’m a member, the URL lets me read more about the issue, but the coldness of that “. .” instead of a sender name or number upsets me anyway.

When I first signed up I had an idea that it would be so quick doing this by SMS, and I’d make up for all those hand-written letters I’ve always meant to send in Amnesty’s campaigns but that I’ve never, ever actually written. After receiving at least 50 messages like this I wonder how on earth SMSes are in any way equivalent to carefully thought out, handwritten letters. Will it actually make any difference? Is it just a way for Amnesty to make a little extra money off premium SMSes? I also imagined there’d be a smart mobs element to it. But there are no connections forged here, no new possibilities. It’s just an extra channel for advertising.

I’m happy to support Amnesty, but these messages make me feel as though they think I’m stupid. They’re too simplified. And I end up trusting Amnesty less. I’m sure that’s not what they intended. I wonder if others react as I do?

Oh dear. A woman to be executed. Maybe innocent, maybe not. It’s wrong to kill people. No matter what they’ve done. I guess I’ll send the SMS after all. Just in case.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

6 thoughts on “send APPEAL to 1960

  1. Eivind

    Thank you for writing down my thoughts so well!

    I first sent one message after seeing an ad at Oslo Sentralstasjon, and then I sent the next few times, but none after that.

    It’s simply so impersonal and untrustworthy, as you say. And I don’t really know what they can do about it either..

  2. DeAnn

    I have almost no idea what any of this means. And I definitely don’t know what the message said! I’m clueless, apparently.

  3. Lars

    Good point about the lack of a sender for the SMSes. Courtesy is so important to Amnesty, I can’t imagine why they didn’t see that. As to how the SMS compares to the carefully thought out, handwritten letters: It doesn’t. Your name is added to a carefully thought out, typed letter that Amnesty sends. Like signing a petition. Who can tell what works best? You could always do both…

  4. Lars

    Latest news: The execution has been postponed.

  5. francis s.

    Well, I just read in the NYTimes that she got a reprieve. So maybe the SMS did something after all? Who knows…

  6. Lene

    I get Appell-sms’s from 1960 very often too!! Do u know if these kind of sms charges you ?

    Jeg s nettopp p tv2 hjelper deg, om sÂnne type meldinger som blir sendt ut til ufrivillige mottakere. Disse kan ofte koste fra 15kr og oppover pr.sms. Ble slitt smÂredd her, i og med at jeg fÂr slike meldinger sÂpass ofte!

    Vet noen hvordan man kan “si opp” ?

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

AI STORIES

AI-generated stories have longer endings than human stories

My colleague Jessica Witte has just shared a preprint where she compared the emotional arcs of the stories we generated using gpt-4o-mini to those of human-authored (pre-2022) stories from the subreddit r/WritingPrompts, conveniently gathered in this dataset. She found a distinct difference in the endings of the LLM-generated stories: both […]

How to peer review a paper in 2026

Dorothy Bishop, a psychologist, wrote a useful list of what reviewers need to look out now that so many papers are bad science that looks good thanks to LLMs. Read her whole blog post, she explains it well, but here’s a brief version because I’m pretty sure we’ll be needing […]

“So what if it was ChatGPT? It *could* have been true!”

I recently read a good article on the different kinds of truth a language model operates with by Luke Mann, Liam Magee and Vanicka Arora, Truth Machines: Synthesizing Veracity in AI Language Models, but despite its lovely typology of truths (consensus, correspondence, coherence and pragmatic) it doesn’t help me with […]

AI STORIES

AI shimmer and sparkle

I have this hunch that sparkles and glow and shimmer are somehow a point in the latent spaces of LLMs that have more connections than you would expect. Perhaps their connotation to magic and to the unknown matches some of the mystique of genAI? Or perhaps these words are used […]

Don’t do a systematic review if you’re in the humanities

This paper is a great example of why you probably shouldn’t use a systematic literature review for a theoretical and conceptual research question like “How does artificial intelligence affect the perception of authenticity and aura in art?” However, if you’re looking for an annotated list of 48 recent articles about […]