1 Comment

  1. NumberCruncher

    I could not reproduce Torleiv Kl¯veís results cited by Karltk, see my comments there. Here is an alternative ranking of the Overall Publication-Faculty Ratio and a new addition: The Prestige Publication-Faculty Ratio ñ where your department, HUMINF, does much better!

    Overall Publication-Faculty Ratio
    (Publication Points/Number of Faculty)
    1. II-UiB: 1.96
    2. IfI-UiO: 0.58
    3. IDI-NTNU: 0.34
    4. Infomedia-UiB: 0.33
    5. HUMINF-UiB: 0.28
    6. SFF QoS-NTNU: 0.22
    7. IfI-Troms¯: 0.04

    New: Prestige Publication-Faculty Ratio
    (Level 2 Prestige Publication Share/Number of Faculty)
    1. II-UiB: 0.24
    2. HUMINF-UiB: 0.16
    3. IfI-UiO: 0.06
    4. IDI-NTNU: 0.04
    5. SFF QoS-NTNU: 0.03
    6. Infomedia-UiB: 0.02
    7. IfI-Troms¯: 0.00

    Note: The category ìNumber of Facultyî excludes administrative and support personnel. The ratios are based on data for the year 2004, available at http://dbh.nsd.uib.no/dbhvev/

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Machine Vision

Cultural Representations of Machine Vision: An Experimental Mixed Methods Workshop

Call for submissions to a workshop, Bergen, Norway
Workshop dates: 15-17 August 2022
Proposals due: 15 June

The Machine Vision in Everyday Life project invites proposals for an interdisciplinary workshop using qualitative approaches and digital methods to analyse how machine vision is represented in art, science fiction, games, social media and other forms of cultural and aesthetic expression.