1 Comment

  1. NumberCruncher

    I could not reproduce Torleiv Kl¯veís results cited by Karltk, see my comments there. Here is an alternative ranking of the Overall Publication-Faculty Ratio and a new addition: The Prestige Publication-Faculty Ratio ñ where your department, HUMINF, does much better!

    Overall Publication-Faculty Ratio
    (Publication Points/Number of Faculty)
    1. II-UiB: 1.96
    2. IfI-UiO: 0.58
    3. IDI-NTNU: 0.34
    4. Infomedia-UiB: 0.33
    5. HUMINF-UiB: 0.28
    6. SFF QoS-NTNU: 0.22
    7. IfI-Troms¯: 0.04

    New: Prestige Publication-Faculty Ratio
    (Level 2 Prestige Publication Share/Number of Faculty)
    1. II-UiB: 0.24
    2. HUMINF-UiB: 0.16
    3. IfI-UiO: 0.06
    4. IDI-NTNU: 0.04
    5. SFF QoS-NTNU: 0.03
    6. Infomedia-UiB: 0.02
    7. IfI-Troms¯: 0.00

    Note: The category ìNumber of Facultyî excludes administrative and support personnel. The ratios are based on data for the year 2004, available at http://dbh.nsd.uib.no/dbhvev/

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

A row of knowledge workers operate sewing machines producing piles of spreadsheets and reports.
AI and algorithmic culture AI STORIES

Språk er makt. Ikke la KI ta den makten fra deg.

Readers who don’t read Norwegian: sorry. This is in Norwegian because it is commenting on a current debate in Norwegian media. Asle Tojes debattinnlegg «får KI-alarmen til å gå,» skriver Petter Bae Brandtzæg, og jeg er enig. Toje sier riktignok nei, han har ikke brukt KI. Han «har kvitteringer,» skriver han, teksten tar […]

Five people on a stage debating
AI and algorithmic culture Algorithmic bias

Debating AI with politicians at Samfundet

I spent Wednesday evening at the famous Studentersamfundet in Trondheim, debating AI with three Norwegian members of parliament, Karianne Tung, who is Norway’s Minister for Digitization, Simen Velle, a representative for FrP, and Hege Bae Nylund, a representative for Rødt. The debate was expertly led by Liva Flo. It’s always […]