I slip my grandmother’s ring onto the middle finger of my right hand. It’s looser than I remember it. My cheeks have lost their fullness, too. I look in the mirror and think that this is what I look like as a woman.

“He gave it to her for their ruby wedding anniversary”, Auntie Joan told me after the funeral, sharing out the jewelry between my sister and me. The flamboyant opal pendant went to my sister, because concerts are more flamboyant than research. I was given the rings. The engagement ring: a lowset, elegant band of diamonds. He was a bank clerk and she, who was she when they met? The silver ring that he made her himself, along with rings and bracelets for their daughters and grandchildren. I remember running into her open arms and the smell of her campher chest. I remember sitting on his lap and playing in his garden. The ruby ring, for forty years of love. It encircles my finger. I keep it on when I shower, when I sleep, because I don’t want to stop believing in the love it promises is possible. I don’t wear the zirconium. It catches in clothes and tears stockings and is not for everyday. The wedding ring is likewise untouched in my jewelry box. It seems not to be mine, though it was given to me.

Ruby, diamond, ruby, diamond, ruby: held close to each other by slightly uneven golden claws. It is imperfect, one diamond smaller than the other. The golden band tapers to almost nothing at the back of my finger. A jeweller told me that the diamonds are cut in an old-fashioned manner. Once, I imagine, it belonged to another beloved woman. Perhaps she died without granddaughters to leave her jewellery to, and so my grandfather bought it for the woman he loved. Generations of love: he loved her, they loved me. The ring is a bond to remind me of this.

One day, perhaps not till after my death, but one day, I’ll give the ring away. With love.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

8 thoughts on “ruby

  1. mcloon

    A lovely post. Rings have such personal connection, don’t they? Once a jeweller friend made me a ring. It had a blue stone, gold-speckled, and she explained to me what it was: lapis lazuli. The words themselves seemed magical. Every now and then, years later, I put it on. It brings back such memories, as if something goes surging through the blood.

  2. Lisa

    There’s that new voice again. I like hearing it.

  3. Auntie Joan

    I think your grandmother is talking to you Jill.
    The ring is a channel to her great legacy of wisdom. What is she saying? The love you have enjoyed from both your grandparents is always there to tap into. You never know, as your blog goes through cyber space THEY may be tapping in to IT ! ! They would be so proud of you I know.

  4. connie

    oh, beautiful ruby ring, beautiful love!
    It recalled me my last trip in Prague. I was so excited to find so many beautiful jewelries there and wanted to buy myself one. But at last I changed my mind and bought one bracelet for my mother, with my tight budget. A small but elegant bracelet made of Czech Granet and old silver. When I told my mother about this on telephone, she was so touched and told me she liked this bracelet very very much, though she hadn’t seen it at that time.
    Love is more beautiful than ruby, than granet, isn’t it?

  5. meredith

    That’s beautiful, Jill. I like these new experiments with voice!

  6. Jill

    Thanks, everyone 🙂

  7. torill

    Remember the bear-ring I wore for a year? I still feel it missing from the right thumb after it made its escape. When I mention that and grieve for it he tells me that I lost the ring because I am no longer lost and in need of the protection and direction. I am starting to believe him. Now, the memory of the bears hugging my thumb is enough, and that cannot be lost. Yes, I think rings have significance beyond looking good on your finger.

    hugs

  8. Jill

    I lost the ring because I am no longer lost and in need of the protection and direction…that’s beautiful…

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.