I basically just spent three and a half years home with kids. Not quite, I worked full time for a few months between the babies, and have been part time for the last year, but part time with a baby at home and juggling childcare with my husband has not left much time for reading, writing and thinking about research. To be honest I’ve barely scraped by doing my teaching and things I had to do and oh my do I feel it now. I think I may have missed a few things. But finally both little ones (now 18 months and nearly 3 1/2 years old) are enjoying preschool (barnehage) and I am loving having full days back at work. Have you noticed that work is more enjoyable when you have enough time to do it properly? I’m also loving how energetic I am in the afternoons with the kids – parenting is such a different kind of work (and fun!) to being a professor that I enjoy it immensely, rather than being exhausted from having already spent all day with them. I love, love, love not having to fit work into naptimes and evenings. Hooray! And I love being back with my colleagues – here’s the latest photo of our growing group at Digital Culture.

Faggruppen i digital kultur
(Back: Davin Heckman (Fulbright scholar), me, Scott Rettberg. Middle: Eric Rasmussen, Patricia Tomaszek, Lise Kristiansen (student advisor), Hilde Corneliussen, Daniel Jung. Front: Rolf Beev (teaching coordinator), Daniel Apollon.)

There are some advantages to spending time away from research. For instance, I can pinpoint the advent of social media quite exactly. Late in 2008 I finished my book, Blogging, and had been reading and blogging voraciously while writing it. Nobody talked about social media back then: the term isn’t even mentioned in my book because nobody used it. Jessie was born in April 2008, and I pretty much ignored academia for the rest of the year. When I returned to work a year later social media was everywhere. The shift in terminology was astounding.

I’ve also learnt a lot about all manner of blogs about children, homes and crafting, and I’ve not only had ample opportunity to refresh my knitting skills (so much more fun to knit for babies than for adults) but I’ve learnt about the new craft economy and sharing communities around that. I’m not sure it will transfer to research but it’s fascinating terrain.

And of course I’ve done a little bit of research, too. I’ve been involved with the ELMCIP project, and am writing an article for that about early electronic literature communities – I’m presenting some of that next week at ISEA in Istanbul. (I know, Istanbul!) I did some work with Clare Hooper on Gowalla and geocaching last year. This year I’m going to be revising my book Blogging for a second edition to come out next year. And I’m teaching of course.

I’m also going to start blogging again. A lot more than once a month. I now understand all those people who used to ask me how I found time to blog. I get it: if you have small children and every minute spent on unnecessary tasks at work feels like its stealing from your time with them it’s hard to justify. But being a researcher means taking time to read, explore, think, write and participate in discussions. Right now I feel as though I’m not quite a part of the research community any longer. I need to engage to get back in, and blogging is the obvious way to do so.

So I’m back! Hello world! 🙂


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

6 thoughts on “returning to research after (sort of) three and a half years away”

  1. Jarle

    Welcome back Jill, looking forward to seeing you blogging again. I have had my pause as well, but can’t blame it on children. Its just life and work that has gotten in the way. But I have the blog-itch again and hope it will end up in blogging both in english and in norwegian on my two blogs.

  2. Clare Hooper

    Welcome back! It’s lovely to have you back in the academic work, and to hear you sounding so enthused about it. Enjoy 🙂

  3. Andrew Stern

    My first impulse was to press “Like” on your post!

  4. Johanne Magnus

    Velkommen tilbake i blogg verdenen.
    Venter fortsatt p din tilbakekomst som foreleser;)

  5. Stephanie

    Welcome back! I understand what you mean. After being on sick leave for a year, coming back is wonderful. I just resurrected my own blog and can’t wait to get back into the conversation!

  6. espen

    Hi Jill, wb and good luck in your restarted day job!

    Regarding the advent of “social media,” Ed Barrett had a book on MIT Press back in 1992 or so called “Sociomedia”. I remember being rather un-impressed at the time with the implication that Media-in-General were not social (and I guess I still am today — grumpiness is ageless!); the notion of “social media” is at least 73% redundant.

    But all buzz words come with a sell-by date (about 10 years?) So “new media” had to be replaced at some point. Which means “social media” should be good until 2018, which leaves six, seven years to think up the next one. Plenty of time to prepare! (Hmm, Omnimedia? Virtual media? Youmedia? Multimedia? …that last one seems oddly familiar…)

    espen

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

screenshot of blogpost from sept 11, 2001, about blogger.com showing blog posts about the attacks
Networked Politics social media

25 years since September 11

I’ve been reading through my blog posts on September 11, 2001 and the days that followed. The things that stand out to me – in addition to the horror of the attack itself – are how massively we (or at least I) used the web to understand what was happening, […]

AI STORIES

AI-generated stories have longer endings than human stories

My colleague Jessica Witte has just shared a preprint where she compared the emotional arcs of the stories we generated using gpt-4o-mini to those of human-authored (pre-2022) stories from the subreddit r/WritingPrompts, conveniently gathered in this dataset. She found a distinct difference in the endings of the LLM-generated stories: both […]

How to peer review a paper in 2026

Dorothy Bishop, a psychologist, wrote a useful list of what reviewers need to look out now that so many papers are bad science that looks good thanks to LLMs. Read her whole blog post, she explains it well, but here’s a brief version because I’m pretty sure we’ll be needing […]

“So what if it was ChatGPT? It *could* have been true!”

I recently read a good article on the different kinds of truth a language model operates with by Luke Mann, Liam Magee and Vanicka Arora, Truth Machines: Synthesizing Veracity in AI Language Models, but despite its lovely typology of truths (consensus, correspondence, coherence and pragmatic) it doesn’t help me with […]

AI STORIES

AI shimmer and sparkle

I have this hunch that sparkles and glow and shimmer are somehow a point in the latent spaces of LLMs that have more connections than you would expect. Perhaps their connotation to magic and to the unknown matches some of the mystique of genAI? Or perhaps these words are used […]