I basically just spent three and a half years home with kids. Not quite, I worked full time for a few months between the babies, and have been part time for the last year, but part time with a baby at home and juggling childcare with my husband has not left much time for reading, writing and thinking about research. To be honest I’ve barely scraped by doing my teaching and things I had to do and oh my do I feel it now. I think I may have missed a few things. But finally both little ones (now 18 months and nearly 3 1/2 years old) are enjoying preschool (barnehage) and I am loving having full days back at work. Have you noticed that work is more enjoyable when you have enough time to do it properly? I’m also loving how energetic I am in the afternoons with the kids – parenting is such a different kind of work (and fun!) to being a professor that I enjoy it immensely, rather than being exhausted from having already spent all day with them. I love, love, love not having to fit work into naptimes and evenings. Hooray! And I love being back with my colleagues – here’s the latest photo of our growing group at Digital Culture.

Faggruppen i digital kultur
(Back: Davin Heckman (Fulbright scholar), me, Scott Rettberg. Middle: Eric Rasmussen, Patricia Tomaszek, Lise Kristiansen (student advisor), Hilde Corneliussen, Daniel Jung. Front: Rolf Beev (teaching coordinator), Daniel Apollon.)

There are some advantages to spending time away from research. For instance, I can pinpoint the advent of social media quite exactly. Late in 2008 I finished my book, Blogging, and had been reading and blogging voraciously while writing it. Nobody talked about social media back then: the term isn’t even mentioned in my book because nobody used it. Jessie was born in April 2008, and I pretty much ignored academia for the rest of the year. When I returned to work a year later social media was everywhere. The shift in terminology was astounding.

I’ve also learnt a lot about all manner of blogs about children, homes and crafting, and I’ve not only had ample opportunity to refresh my knitting skills (so much more fun to knit for babies than for adults) but I’ve learnt about the new craft economy and sharing communities around that. I’m not sure it will transfer to research but it’s fascinating terrain.

And of course I’ve done a little bit of research, too. I’ve been involved with the ELMCIP project, and am writing an article for that about early electronic literature communities – I’m presenting some of that next week at ISEA in Istanbul. (I know, Istanbul!) I did some work with Clare Hooper on Gowalla and geocaching last year. This year I’m going to be revising my book Blogging for a second edition to come out next year. And I’m teaching of course.

I’m also going to start blogging again. A lot more than once a month. I now understand all those people who used to ask me how I found time to blog. I get it: if you have small children and every minute spent on unnecessary tasks at work feels like its stealing from your time with them it’s hard to justify. But being a researcher means taking time to read, explore, think, write and participate in discussions. Right now I feel as though I’m not quite a part of the research community any longer. I need to engage to get back in, and blogging is the obvious way to do so.

So I’m back! Hello world! 🙂


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

6 thoughts on “returning to research after (sort of) three and a half years away

  1. Jarle

    Welcome back Jill, looking forward to seeing you blogging again. I have had my pause as well, but can’t blame it on children. Its just life and work that has gotten in the way. But I have the blog-itch again and hope it will end up in blogging both in english and in norwegian on my two blogs.

  2. Clare Hooper

    Welcome back! It’s lovely to have you back in the academic work, and to hear you sounding so enthused about it. Enjoy 🙂

  3. Andrew Stern

    My first impulse was to press “Like” on your post!

  4. Johanne Magnus

    Velkommen tilbake i blogg verdenen.
    Venter fortsatt p din tilbakekomst som foreleser;)

  5. Stephanie

    Welcome back! I understand what you mean. After being on sick leave for a year, coming back is wonderful. I just resurrected my own blog and can’t wait to get back into the conversation!

  6. espen

    Hi Jill, wb and good luck in your restarted day job!

    Regarding the advent of “social media,” Ed Barrett had a book on MIT Press back in 1992 or so called “Sociomedia”. I remember being rather un-impressed at the time with the implication that Media-in-General were not social (and I guess I still am today — grumpiness is ageless!); the notion of “social media” is at least 73% redundant.

    But all buzz words come with a sell-by date (about 10 years?) So “new media” had to be replaced at some point. Which means “social media” should be good until 2018, which leaves six, seven years to think up the next one. Plenty of time to prepare! (Hmm, Omnimedia? Virtual media? Youmedia? Multimedia? …that last one seems oddly familiar…)

    espen

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Screenshot of a paragraph from a New York Times article published May 12, 2026. Text reads: "The price of tomatoes -tart bursts of flavor in salads and sandwiches — surged nearly 40 percent in April from a year ago on a combination of bad weather, high tariffs and climbing transportation costs."
AI STORIES

Genre glitches and unexpected promotional phrases as a sign of AI writing

A genre glitch is a characteristic of LLM-assisted writing where the text suddenly switches genre, typically inserting a short promotional phrase full of sensory details into an informational text. Genre glitches occur when a word in the generated text is heavily associated with a genre or context that is markedly […]

Top of a ransom note from Shinyhunters hacking group. Text reads: "SHINYHUNTERS rooting your systems since '19 ;) ShinyHunters has breached Instructure (again). Instead of contacting us to resolve it they ignored us and did some "security patches"."
Networked Politics University politics

UiB self-hosts the open source version of Canvas, so wasn’t affected by the breach

On May 1st Canvas announced a security breach, and then yesterday the system was hacked. The login page was replaced by a ransom note: if universities don’t pay up by 12 May, student data will be released. Here’s what the login page looked like yesterday: Way back in 2015, when […]

AI and algorithmic culture Networked Politics

AI-generated images, fascist aesthetics: Dieselbrølet and Heimatstrom

My German is pretty dodgy, so when I first saw Heimatstrom on Bluesky, shared by Roland Meyer, a professor of visual culture at Universität Zürich’s Digital Society Initiative, I misinterpreted it and thought it was a far-right campaign. But no, Heimatstrom is a group of left-wing environmentalists using fascist AI […]

Photo of a billboard ad at Oslo S train station showing a smiliing conductor and the text "Du må ikke sove. Joda, bare sov du."
AI STORIES

“Du må ikke sove”: a floating motif detached from its meaning (or: LLMs can write Norwegian but miss cultural references)

There’s a new ad for the train between Stavanger and Oslo in Norway that uses a line from Arnulf Øverland’s famous anti-fascist poem Du må ikke sove (“You must not sleep”). Du må ikke sove, you must not sleep, the ad says. And then it flips it, jovially, joda, bare […]

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.