The radio interview this morning was fun, and living as we do in convergent times, they remediated it into a web article three hours later: Doktor i internettfiksjon [update: with a link to the audio]. Very efficient way of interviewing people, that. I mean, it was literally a four minute interview, with all of three minutes of small talk on either side. My taxi pulled up at 6:53 (a little late, the driver went to the wrong address…) and they waved goodbye to me at 7:03, by which time the news had been on for three minutes.

The taxi driver who drove me home was cute. It was his second day on the job, so he was extra talkative, and by way of conversation he asked me whether I worked at NRK, where he’d picked me up. No, no, I said, they interviewed me. “Oh, you’re famous!” he said, making me laugh with that pleasure at being flattered, even jokingly. “You can drop me off here”, I said, “don’t bother driving all the way in, there’s so little room to turn.” But he insisted. “Nonsense! You’re famous! I’ll drive you all the way to your door step!”

He had the radio on, of course, but it was tuned to Radio 1. Not NRK.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

5 thoughts on “radio, remediated

  1. solveig

    by the way (comment to the web article), have you seen the tobacco baron game at http://www.tobakkdreper.no? another variant of games with political agendas, with a “learn more about how the tobacco industry operates”-rhetoric

  2. real icon

    Jaha, du “kominerte” dine to lidenskaper?
    😉
    It was fun to be able to listen to you. Maybe you could regard that interview as a kind of warm up for the defense – testing your reactions to questions you didn’t quite expect (the “most shocking” thing you’ve come across during your research etc. …). I’m sure you will do a great job!
    I wish I’d get some critical response about my thesis before my disputatio … *suck* Well, at least I will have the opportunity to make changes to the text afterwards, which you probably won’t have, I guess? Anyway, I wish you all the best!

  3. Jill

    Wow, someone actually heard the interview! That’s amazing! I thought no one would be up that early! And I even forgot to tell my mother, for which omission I bet she’s mad at me… “But it was on my blog, Mum!” Hm.

    I’d managed to forget the “most shocking” question. Yes, that was unexpected. What the most shocking thing I’d come across was? Hm…

    But I’m totally confused: who are you, Real Icon? I don’t recognise your email address and your URL is a German Harry Potter site?

  4. real icon

    Sorry
    (1)
    to disappoint you, Jill, I actually didn’t listen to the live broadcast (this would have been a little difficult here in Munich) – the NRK site you linked to simply offers an audio file of your interview, so all I had to do was to click on the link, and voil‡ … (most shocking: the 9/11 stuff)

    (2)
    not to have introduced myself … It was a little difficult to do it while both my brothers and my father were quarreling whose turn it was to use the computer. The new coremi-link might help.

  5. Jill

    There’s an audio link? So there is! Cool! How silly of me to have missed that!

    Now I’ll dare talk with my Mum again, I can tell her she didn’t miss a thing, though I did forget to tell her to listen to the radio 🙂

    Good luck with your defence, Cornelia!

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Screenshot of a paragraph from a New York Times article published May 12, 2026. Text reads: "The price of tomatoes -tart bursts of flavor in salads and sandwiches — surged nearly 40 percent in April from a year ago on a combination of bad weather, high tariffs and climbing transportation costs."
AI STORIES

Genre glitches and unexpected promotional phrases as a sign of AI writing

A genre glitch is a characteristic of LLM-assisted writing where the text suddenly switches genre, typically inserting a short promotional phrase full of sensory details into an informational text. Genre glitches occur when a word in the generated text is heavily associated with a genre or context that is markedly […]

Top of a ransom note from Shinyhunters hacking group. Text reads: "SHINYHUNTERS rooting your systems since '19 ;) ShinyHunters has breached Instructure (again). Instead of contacting us to resolve it they ignored us and did some "security patches"."
Networked Politics University politics

UiB self-hosts the open source version of Canvas, so wasn’t affected by the breach

On May 1st Canvas announced a security breach, and then yesterday the system was hacked. The login page was replaced by a ransom note: if universities don’t pay up by 12 May, student data will be released. Here’s what the login page looked like yesterday: Way back in 2015, when […]

AI and algorithmic culture Networked Politics

AI-generated images, fascist aesthetics: Dieselbrølet and Heimatstrom

My German is pretty dodgy, so when I first saw Heimatstrom on Bluesky, shared by Roland Meyer, a professor of visual culture at Universität Zürich’s Digital Society Initiative, I misinterpreted it and thought it was a far-right campaign. But no, Heimatstrom is a group of left-wing environmentalists using fascist AI […]

Photo of a billboard ad at Oslo S train station showing a smiliing conductor and the text "Du må ikke sove. Joda, bare sov du."
AI STORIES

“Du må ikke sove”: a floating motif detached from its meaning (or: LLMs can write Norwegian but miss cultural references)

There’s a new ad for the train between Stavanger and Oslo in Norway that uses a line from Arnulf Øverland’s famous anti-fascist poem Du må ikke sove (“You must not sleep”). Du må ikke sove, you must not sleep, the ad says. And then it flips it, jovially, joda, bare […]

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.