Poetry used to be a closed circuit, Emily Warn is saying. She runs PoetryFoundation.org, a site that has a couple of hundred million in funding, that just won a Webby – they have thousands of poems, classic and contemporary poems chosen for their literary value, and they’re online and searchable. After just a year, they have a lot of readers and a lot of links from people of all kinds using their poems. Playing with the tension between the high culture and the general audience is exactly what they want to do. Until the web, the literary world hasn’t had an audience large enough or voracious enough to search through all those texts and find the gems. In addition to a really useful database of classic and contemporary poems, they play with graphic interpretations of poems and more, and explore what happens when a mass audience uses classical poems in their own ways instead of in the ways schools and literati want them to.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.