Did you see the US Government have posted an “Interactive Travel Map” of Hillary Clinton’s travel? It’s nothing like as pretty as the personal reports Dopplr generates for you if you tell it about all your travel – here’s Clinton’s travel map next to the the report Dopplr made for Barack Obama’s 2008 travels.

Dopplr's personal annual travel report for Barack Obama

I’ve been using Dopplr sort of half-heartedly for a while, entering most of my trips and carefully not making my profile public because I’m a little paranoid about the entire world knowing exactly where I am at any given time. Did you read that article in Wired about location tracking websites and privacy? The guy saw a woman taking a photo on her (GPS-enabled) iPhone in the park, went home, searched Flickr photos by location, found the photo, looked at the rest of her photos, and through the GPS location stamped on her photos of “home” figured out exactly where she lived. Mind you, I was talking with NRKbeta‘s ÿyvind Solstad last week – he loves these kind of services, and pointed out that a simpler way to find out where the woman lived would have been to simply follow her home. You don’t necessarily need technology to be creepy.

But my Dopplr profile is still private and I only let friends see it. And on Dopplr I only have 21 friends, which obviously limits its functionality – a main point of it is to be able to see which people you know who are in the same city as you when you’re travelling.

And then I saw my annual report for 2008. Oh, how I love it! It’s not entirely accurate – it thought I lived in Bergen, New Jersey (5734 km from Bergen to Barcelona?) and there’s 20 days in Chicago last July that I guess I hadn’t entered into Dopplr, so they’re not there – but it’s pretty awesome anyway. The minute I saw it I printed it out and hung it up on my office wall.

My personal annual report from Dopplr

Years ago I was out on the balcony at a party and noticed a girl fiddling with a GPS, setting her coordinates. She told me that most people didn’t get why she liked to do that. But her grandmother did: “Oh, I see, love,” the grandmother had said, “it’s like a diary!” And that’s exactly how this girl (whose name I can’t remember) used her GPS – as another way of documenting her life, of keeping memories.

With the annual reports, Dopplr turns my raw data into a visual diary, and it does it beautifully. It lets me see connections and trends that I hadn’t even thought about before – I hadn’t realised I was away from home for 97 days last year, for instance. That’s a lot!

There are lots of other kinds of data-collecting sites that visualise your data in different ways. I thought Dailybooth and Dailymugshot were pretty weird when I first saw them – social network sites built around taking your own photo every day? But Dailybooth generates YouTube videos from the photos, even using the same music as Noah takes a photo of himself every day for six years, which I think was the first of this kind of video to hit YouTube fame. Dailymugshot.com generates animations that are pretty similar. I love Flickr’s calendar view in the archives, where you see a photo for every day of the month (if you uploaded every day). And I’ve already written about the baby sleep visualisation at Trixietracker.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

3 thoughts on “personal data visualisation: dopplr, dailybooth, flickr and trixietracker

  1. Scott Smith

    Nice post by @jilltxt on Data viz and location: “You don’t necessarily need technology to be creepy.” Too right. http://is.gd/lVKg

  2. Visualising widgets « SAKJ

    […] Visualising widgets Sparat under: CYSWIK, English, methods — sakj @ 14:21 I have been thinking of how you can visualise different data after attending CYSWIK Pre Valentines seminar. Recently I read about dopplr at Jilltxt. Dopplr is a tool for sharing information about your travels. Dopplr Visualisation of Obamas travles […]

  3. […] I’m drawing on my current fascination with all the ways in which social media sites offer ways of visualising or otherwise organising our data – I wrote about some examples here on my blog a while ago. I need to finish the paper by May 20, before I go to the E-Poetry conference in Barcelona, so I’ll be working hard on it over the next few weeks – and intend to blog about it as I go. […]

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Screenshot of a paragraph from a New York Times article published May 12, 2026. Text reads: "The price of tomatoes -tart bursts of flavor in salads and sandwiches — surged nearly 40 percent in April from a year ago on a combination of bad weather, high tariffs and climbing transportation costs."
AI STORIES

Genre glitches and unexpected promotional phrases as a sign of AI writing

A genre glitch is a characteristic of LLM-assisted writing where the text suddenly switches genre, typically inserting a short promotional phrase full of sensory details into an informational text. Genre glitches occur when a word in the generated text is heavily associated with a genre or context that is markedly […]

Top of a ransom note from Shinyhunters hacking group. Text reads: "SHINYHUNTERS rooting your systems since '19 ;) ShinyHunters has breached Instructure (again). Instead of contacting us to resolve it they ignored us and did some "security patches"."
Networked Politics University politics

UiB self-hosts the open source version of Canvas, so wasn’t affected by the breach

On May 1st Canvas announced a security breach, and then yesterday the system was hacked. The login page was replaced by a ransom note: if universities don’t pay up by 12 May, student data will be released. Here’s what the login page looked like yesterday: Way back in 2015, when […]

AI and algorithmic culture Networked Politics

AI-generated images, fascist aesthetics: Dieselbrølet and Heimatstrom

My German is pretty dodgy, so when I first saw Heimatstrom on Bluesky, shared by Roland Meyer, a professor of visual culture at Universität Zürich’s Digital Society Initiative, I misinterpreted it and thought it was a far-right campaign. But no, Heimatstrom is a group of left-wing environmentalists using fascist AI […]

Photo of a billboard ad at Oslo S train station showing a smiliing conductor and the text "Du må ikke sove. Joda, bare sov du."
AI STORIES

“Du må ikke sove”: a floating motif detached from its meaning (or: LLMs can write Norwegian but miss cultural references)

There’s a new ad for the train between Stavanger and Oslo in Norway that uses a line from Arnulf Øverland’s famous anti-fascist poem Du må ikke sove (“You must not sleep”). Du må ikke sove, you must not sleep, the ad says. And then it flips it, jovially, joda, bare […]

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.