Se, han danser med en annen, skrev Tove Ditlevsen. Og allikevel gÂr jeg ikke. For lidelsen er en lenke som bringer den magiske vellyst lykken aldri kan skjenke.

SÂnn er det, ogsÂ. Elske sitt glad og elske sitt lei seg. Ekel¯f: Du frÂgar: Varfˆr kˆnsord, varfˆr kuk och fitta? Det ‰r fˆr att vi inte har nÂgra ord fˆr Sm‰rtan. Det ljuvaste, det svÂrast ber‰kneliga. Det som ‰r glˆd Ât unga, varma minnen Ât gamla, ‰r den ljuva Sm‰rtan, det mˆrka Syskonet. (Vigdis Hjort, Om bare, 313-14)


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

2 thoughts on “omvendt

  1. Lisbeth

    Jill,
    Jeg kan ikke lade vÊre: det er Tove Ditlevsen med v…en af vores bedste kvindelige digtere, synes jeg, selvom hun rimede p vers og ikke altid var s moderne i stil efter de h¯je herrers mening.
    Du skulle lÊse hendes erindringsbog om hendes voksenliv, om forelskelser, brudte Êgteskaber og stofmisbrug. StÊrkt!
    Her er hele digtet, i¯vrigt:

    Mit hjerte hamrer og hamrer,
    som ville det aldrig standse.
    Det g¯r ondt at h¯re din latter
    og ondt at se dig danse.

    Alligevel gÂr jeg ikke,
    for lidelsen er en lÊnke,
    der bringer hin magiske vellyst,
    lykken aldrig kan skÊnke.

    Din arm omkring hendes skulder,
    din hede kind mod hendes.
    Mit hjerte hamrer s sÊlsomt,
    Som var det den anden kvindes.

    Som var en del af mit vÊsen,
    min skÊlven, min angst, min varme
    altid anbragt i den person,
    du holder i dine arme.

  2. Jill

    Ajaj! Jeg visste jo egentlig at det er Ditlevsen med v, takk for pÂminnelsen! NÂ har jeg rettet det opp. Jeg har lest en bok av henne for lenge siden, men skulle kanskje hente henne fram igjen…? Skj¯nt det jo ikke er utroskap jeg sliter med…

    Men tenk om det virkelig er smerten vi s¯ker og ikke kjÊrligheten?

    Nei. Slik tenker bare den som har kjÊrlighetssorg. Et ord som ikke finnes p engelsk.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

AI STORIES

AI-generated stories have longer endings than human stories

My colleague Jessica Witte has just shared a preprint where she compared the emotional arcs of the stories we generated using gpt-4o-mini to those of human-authored (pre-2022) stories from the subreddit r/WritingPrompts, conveniently gathered in this dataset. She found a distinct difference in the endings of the LLM-generated stories: both […]

How to peer review a paper in 2026

Dorothy Bishop, a psychologist, wrote a useful list of what reviewers need to look out now that so many papers are bad science that looks good thanks to LLMs. Read her whole blog post, she explains it well, but here’s a brief version because I’m pretty sure we’ll be needing […]

“So what if it was ChatGPT? It *could* have been true!”

I recently read a good article on the different kinds of truth a language model operates with by Luke Mann, Liam Magee and Vanicka Arora, Truth Machines: Synthesizing Veracity in AI Language Models, but despite its lovely typology of truths (consensus, correspondence, coherence and pragmatic) it doesn’t help me with […]

AI STORIES

AI shimmer and sparkle

I have this hunch that sparkles and glow and shimmer are somehow a point in the latent spaces of LLMs that have more connections than you would expect. Perhaps their connotation to magic and to the unknown matches some of the mystique of genAI? Or perhaps these words are used […]

Don’t do a systematic review if you’re in the humanities

This paper is a great example of why you probably shouldn’t use a systematic literature review for a theoretical and conceptual research question like “How does artificial intelligence affect the perception of authenticity and aura in art?” However, if you’re looking for an annotated list of 48 recent articles about […]