If you love the idea of NaNoWrMo (write a novel in a month) you might want to sign up for the NOVEL project. Three authors will be locked into transparent cubicles for a month with no contact with the world (well, a phone call to a friend and a public reading each Saturday and dinner with each other each evening) but with the world peering in at them. At the end of the month they’re supposed to present a novel of at least 125 pages. What a horrible idea.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

5 thoughts on “NOVEL

  1. torill

    This is almost as thrilling as my big brother idea: collect a group of scholars, give them limited access to resources such as computers, paper and reading material in order to make them earn it, and then reward them with food, wine and different excesses for the best papers produced at intervals during the 100 days locked up in the bunker. Wouldn’t that be nasty and paranoid?

  2. Jill

    Wouldn’t this be a satisfying way of teaching, though? You would be QUITE SURE that the students weren’t wasting their time having fun or working for pay instead of writing their papers. You could walk past the cage every day or two to smile and wave, and yes, little rewards and some healthy competition for food, computer time and so on a la Survivor.

    I know some MA students I might do this to if they’re not careful 😉

  3. Elin

    You know…. I’d do it! Wouldn’t it be liberating to have nothing but ONE thing to do – and at the end – you’d have your novel! And the dinner each night…it would be social?

  4. Jill

    Well, uh, but I’D GO MAD! I mean, yes, I like and need time alone but if I spend more than two days at home working with no adults and nothing but a phone call I get cabin fever. I dunno that a dinner a night would be enough.

    I think you should volunteer!

  5. Norman

    Sadly we see this theatrical trivialisation of writing occurring at the same time that society moves increasingly to education systems which operate on the opposite approach. We encourage/permit/turn a blind eye to students who use others’ work and effort to gain “qualifications”. I wouldn’t spend too much time worrying about an author’s work not being his own; but I do worry about the long term implications for Western Society, of large scale “legitimised cheating”.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

AI STORIES

AI-generated stories have longer endings than human stories

My colleague Jessica Witte has just shared a preprint where she compared the emotional arcs of the stories we generated using gpt-4o-mini to those of human-authored (pre-2022) stories from the subreddit r/WritingPrompts, conveniently gathered in this dataset. She found a distinct difference in the endings of the LLM-generated stories: both […]

How to peer review a paper in 2026

Dorothy Bishop, a psychologist, wrote a useful list of what reviewers need to look out now that so many papers are bad science that looks good thanks to LLMs. Read her whole blog post, she explains it well, but here’s a brief version because I’m pretty sure we’ll be needing […]

“So what if it was ChatGPT? It *could* have been true!”

I recently read a good article on the different kinds of truth a language model operates with by Luke Mann, Liam Magee and Vanicka Arora, Truth Machines: Synthesizing Veracity in AI Language Models, but despite its lovely typology of truths (consensus, correspondence, coherence and pragmatic) it doesn’t help me with […]

AI STORIES

AI shimmer and sparkle

I have this hunch that sparkles and glow and shimmer are somehow a point in the latent spaces of LLMs that have more connections than you would expect. Perhaps their connotation to magic and to the unknown matches some of the mystique of genAI? Or perhaps these words are used […]

Don’t do a systematic review if you’re in the humanities

This paper is a great example of why you probably shouldn’t use a systematic literature review for a theoretical and conceptual research question like “How does artificial intelligence affect the perception of authenticity and aura in art?” However, if you’re looking for an annotated list of 48 recent articles about […]