I suspect that the blogging I used to have the students doing in previous iterations of this course probably saved a lot of student email. Students read each others blogs, asked questions and answered questions in them, and when they succeeded in a task they’d struggled with they blogged how they’d solved the problem.

The reason I haven’t had them blogging this year is that
a) Blogging was great with 30 students. I could track their blogs and I did a great job connecting the blogs and cross-linking and showing off good student posts and stuff. When the class grew to around 70 students I was overwhelmed – I don’t think it’s possible to keep track of such a large group. Even if you put a lot of extra time into genuinely following 70 blogs, I’m not sure you’d mentally be able to facilitate such a group in the way I think you need to do to get most students keen enough to put some effort into their blogs. Some students will get it instantly, of course. Others need more practice and experience to see what good it’ll do them. It’s helping them use their blogs to discuss and network that’s the challenge.
b) I’ve been very ambivalent to blogging in the last few months. I.e. blogging when you’re a slightly established academic rather than a grad student seems to be more about self-presentation than about communication. Maybe it always was in a way but it didn’t feel like it.

So maybe what I need to do is figure out a way of doing blogs – or something similar – in a large group. Perhaps there’d be a way of having students share the task of nurturing the network?


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

7 thoughts on “not doing student blogging

  1. Thomas

    Would group-blogs do the trick? I find publishing to a blog with others both helps me focus on the topic of the blog and the high rate of posting encourages me to post myself. At least it would be fewer blogs to monitor, but maybe not fewer posts… Problem still not solved.

    And then, maybe a wiki would do the trick for your students. One large course wiki would probably be better than scattered blogs.

  2. Shaded

    Sounds like a forum to this old school hacker.

    Blogs are nothing more than forums that authenticate one person and are search engine friendly.

  3. AndreSC

    Perhaps you are sensing the need for some renewal of perceptions and assumptions of what exactly blogging is, and isn’t about. What seems in short supply is intelligent ways of navigating all this stuff, some new augmented intelligence technology beyond basic aggregation. Having said that I’ve experienced similar frustrations down the line after trying to introduce design students to online community phenomenon like Deviant Art ñ but many of our difficulties have to do with trying to bridge the digital divide.

    Blogging is now past the early-adopters only phase, and blogging for blogging’s sake a bit last decade, what are the most exciting developments and properties of the new in hyper media? Just slapping 2.0 on blogging? What real impact can be had on the world?

    Agree with Shaded, and forums are nothing but bulletin boards, which in turn are not much more than cave-wall paintings, aren’t they? :- ) Blogging is about 200 000 years old then by my guestimate, no wonder the novelty wears off.

  4. Steve Shimanek

    AndreSC, I’m sure that you know more about this than I do, but I thought I would “testify” about ABDMom’s blog, which has given my wife and I insight into the whole procedure of looking for an academic post across the Atlantic. Were this painted on a cave, obviously we would have to first get on an oceanliner, buy a ticket to the cave and hope that a whole host of other people had done likewise so that we could get the additional value of ‘peer review’ from her reading community. I think you’re right that reflecting on new ways to navigate is worthwhile — an example might be flickr’s recent tweaking of their interestingness algorithm to be more than just a popularity contest weighted by user-input.

  5. Francois Lachance

    Jill, you might want to revisit the young person who wrote “most of the time I just relax and figure, fine, they’ll see I’m just a regular person, that’ll help them achieve what they want without thinking they need to be perfect. I’m so young a teacher anyway I figure I don’t have to prove my authority yet.” — your own comments to an entry on Weez Blog back in August of 03.
    http://weez.oyzon.com/archives/000115.html

    Behind the pedagogical impluse to inquire about group logistics and scales of blogging experience
    might be a wee bit of nostalgia. “For what?” you may ask. For a time when you thought you had time enough and world.

    Your research seems to be turning towards blogging as process rather than blog as product. Hence I suspect a wee bit of hesitation. I wonder if
    “Itís helping them use their blogs to discuss and network thatís the challenge.”
    could not be restated to “help them network and discuss” _tout court_ and thus evidence of blogging experience is but one of the criteria for students to demonstrate that they have indeed networked and discussed. i.e. with a larger number of students, stand back from the process and assess a selection of products that they have submitted in portfolio form to you as prof. The spin off value from such an approach is that students become responsible for their own personal archive (i.e. documenting their own interactions blog and otherwise) and such personal archives are vital for networking and discussion. It might be worth investing a little time in creating a portfolio of examples that students can review as they build their own.

    Such an approach doesn’t replace a sense of being there when they actually take those steps in their evolution as social and intellectual beings. But from a phenomenological perspective that was all it was, a sense of being there.

  6. Jill

    FranÁois, you’re amazing. Helping me reconnect with my previous self!? Thank you!

    I think one thing that happened between then and now is that I’ve become far more aware of those that have authority over me. I mean, now I have to attend all these meetings (well, OK, not that many, few enough that I’m still kind of scared of them) with The Professors who are all still twenty or thirty years older than me and far more experienced and published, and I have to – or I feel I have to – prove my seriousness to them.

    It’s not exactly that I feel like a fraud. There’s definitely a fragility though, a figure-out-what-I-am sort of going on.

  7. Niklas

    Perhaps you could pick a topic (let’s say blogging for instance) and make a group blogg about that topic, urging the students to post and be creative.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Screenshot of a paragraph from a New York Times article published May 12, 2026. Text reads: "The price of tomatoes -tart bursts of flavor in salads and sandwiches — surged nearly 40 percent in April from a year ago on a combination of bad weather, high tariffs and climbing transportation costs."
AI STORIES

Genre glitches and unexpected promotional phrases as a sign of AI writing

A genre glitch is a characteristic of LLM-assisted writing where the text suddenly switches genre, typically inserting a short promotional phrase full of sensory details into an informational text. Genre glitches occur when a word in the generated text is heavily associated with a genre or context that is markedly […]

Top of a ransom note from Shinyhunters hacking group. Text reads: "SHINYHUNTERS rooting your systems since '19 ;) ShinyHunters has breached Instructure (again). Instead of contacting us to resolve it they ignored us and did some "security patches"."
Networked Politics University politics

UiB self-hosts the open source version of Canvas, so wasn’t affected by the breach

On May 1st Canvas announced a security breach, and then yesterday the system was hacked. The login page was replaced by a ransom note: if universities don’t pay up by 12 May, student data will be released. Here’s what the login page looked like yesterday: Way back in 2015, when […]

AI and algorithmic culture Networked Politics

AI-generated images, fascist aesthetics: Dieselbrølet and Heimatstrom

My German is pretty dodgy, so when I first saw Heimatstrom on Bluesky, shared by Roland Meyer, a professor of visual culture at Universität Zürich’s Digital Society Initiative, I misinterpreted it and thought it was a far-right campaign. But no, Heimatstrom is a group of left-wing environmentalists using fascist AI […]

Photo of a billboard ad at Oslo S train station showing a smiliing conductor and the text "Du må ikke sove. Joda, bare sov du."
AI STORIES

“Du må ikke sove”: a floating motif detached from its meaning (or: LLMs can write Norwegian but miss cultural references)

There’s a new ad for the train between Stavanger and Oslo in Norway that uses a line from Arnulf Øverland’s famous anti-fascist poem Du må ikke sove (“You must not sleep”). Du må ikke sove, you must not sleep, the ad says. And then it flips it, jovially, joda, bare […]

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.