I would probably vote for SV if I was a Norwegian citizen and could vote in the Norwegian elections this September, as I agree with them more than I agree with most other parties, but I think Mathias Fischer has a valid point that SV’s current social media campaign, #norskeverdier, has some flaws. The premiss of the campaing is to “reclaim Norwegian values” from the right wing parties and show that Norwegian values (= norske verdier) are in fact gender equality, equal rights, diversity and solidarity, values that of course are central to SV’s party program. Audun Lysbakken, who leads SV, is shown in a national costume eating a kebab to front the campaign, though personally I like the photo of the full leadership group, looking wonderfully silly in their national costumes.

The retweets on Twitter suggest that the flaw is that anyone can use the #norskeverdier tag, and of course hashtags can’t be locked down. So you have tweets like “Oil and gas. #norskeverdier” or “Refusing illegal immigrants with third degree burns medical help after suicide attempts. #norskeverdier”. Not quite what SV had in mind?

Or perhaps it was. On Dagsnytt 18 last night, Lysbakken said the purpose of the campaign wasn’t to get all Norwegians to post tweets about equality and solidarity but to challenge FrP’s claim that they are the representatives of “Norwegian values”, and what Norwegian values are. Lysbakken said we shouldn’t think there is a set of values that “all Norwegians” (whatever that means) share. In an opinion piece in Dagbladet, Lysbakken writes that SV wants to break down the division between a Norwegian “we” and an immigrated “them”.

Certainly as an immigrant, or a second-generation immigrant as I’m known here, since I was born here of immigrated parents (no, you don’t get to be Norwegian just because you’re born here) the idea of Norwegian values raises very mixed emotions. On the one hand, I love living in a country with universal healthcare, good parental leave, subsidised and high-quality child care, no meetings after 4 pm because everyone knows parents need to pick their kids up, decent unemployment benefits etc etc etc. On the other hand I am regularly appalled by the xenophobia I see here. What is the fear of dual citizenship, in a world where so many of us have cultural roots in more than one country? What do you mean my children inherit the worst possible residence rights – not my permanent residency after 35 years of living here, but their father’s at the time temporary permit, since he had only lived here two years? What do you mean two Norwegian-born children lost their Norwegian citizenship because their Australian father signed them up to also be Australian by descent, and now Norway won’t let the family return to Norway with the Norwegian mother because the two twins are not Norwegian citizens and their mother doesn’t have high enough income to get a family reunion visa to bring them with her?

australian-twins-denied-norwegian-citizenship

Norwegian values. I love them and I hate them.

I like some of the photos SV is sharing as part of their campaign, though. The caption on this one asks “Am I Norwegian enough now?”

norsk-nok-nå?

This morning the satirists at Opplysningskontoret posted their own response, on FrP’s behalf, with Per Sandvik (the second in command for FrP) as Chairman Mao and the tagline: “OK, Audun. Let’s talk about equality.”

opplysningskontoret-FrP-likhet

I’ll leave the interpretation of that up to you.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

2 thoughts on “Norwegian values

  1. Ellen

    Thanks for posting about this. I too am torn on these issues. The campaign is fun and appealing, but I wonder if SV is anywhere near in a position to implement any real change? The fake FRP ad is hilarious; it’s a pretty obvious example of turnabout is fair play; the SOCIALIST leftists play dress up and “pretend” to be real Norwegians, so the “REAL” Norwegian FRP-ers play dress up and pretend to be socialists. Oh the irony 🙂

  2. Kristoffer Jul-Larsen

    Just a quick note on the point nationality and citizenship: SV is one of two parties (Venstre is the other) in parliament that supports dual citizenship. So, when SV takes on the concept of national values, it’s a moving concept we’re faced with.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Screenshot of a paragraph from a New York Times article published May 12, 2026. Text reads: "The price of tomatoes -tart bursts of flavor in salads and sandwiches — surged nearly 40 percent in April from a year ago on a combination of bad weather, high tariffs and climbing transportation costs."
AI STORIES

Genre glitches and unexpected promotional phrases as a sign of AI writing

A genre glitch is a characteristic of LLM-assisted writing where the text suddenly switches genre, typically inserting a short promotional phrase full of sensory details into an informational text. Genre glitches occur when a word in the generated text is heavily associated with a genre or context that is markedly […]

Top of a ransom note from Shinyhunters hacking group. Text reads: "SHINYHUNTERS rooting your systems since '19 ;) ShinyHunters has breached Instructure (again). Instead of contacting us to resolve it they ignored us and did some "security patches"."
Networked Politics University politics

UiB self-hosts the open source version of Canvas, so wasn’t affected by the breach

On May 1st Canvas announced a security breach, and then yesterday the system was hacked. The login page was replaced by a ransom note: if universities don’t pay up by 12 May, student data will be released. Here’s what the login page looked like yesterday: Way back in 2015, when […]

AI and algorithmic culture Networked Politics

AI-generated images, fascist aesthetics: Dieselbrølet and Heimatstrom

My German is pretty dodgy, so when I first saw Heimatstrom on Bluesky, shared by Roland Meyer, a professor of visual culture at Universität Zürich’s Digital Society Initiative, I misinterpreted it and thought it was a far-right campaign. But no, Heimatstrom is a group of left-wing environmentalists using fascist AI […]

Photo of a billboard ad at Oslo S train station showing a smiliing conductor and the text "Du må ikke sove. Joda, bare sov du."
AI STORIES

“Du må ikke sove”: a floating motif detached from its meaning (or: LLMs can write Norwegian but miss cultural references)

There’s a new ad for the train between Stavanger and Oslo in Norway that uses a line from Arnulf Øverland’s famous anti-fascist poem Du må ikke sove (“You must not sleep”). Du må ikke sove, you must not sleep, the ad says. And then it flips it, jovially, joda, bare […]

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.