I’m giving a talk in Narvik on Monday at the literature festival. The general theme of the festival this year is youth literature, and I’ve been invited to talk about net literature since young people surf. My title is “Nettlitteratur – nye stemmer og ny teknologi”. So I’m going to talk about web diaries and blogs as literary endeavours, and show how teenagers often combine design and writing, and how the writing is often very good. I’m poking around for examples now. I’m not sure whether to show “regular” net lit or not. Mm.

I like papirepler by Karina Junker. Nice design (visually, it’s kind of cryptic to navigate and I don’t like that it’s all hidden in frames and you can’t link to bits of it, but it does look good), lovely sketches, and she writes well about choice little topics. In this long fairly mundane listed post (sorry, no design on the direct links) item 2 on the list is “hendene mine er laget av sn¯”, my hands are made of snow. There are tiny bursts of joy like that throughout the site. Look at the way she presents herself if you click her name under each post. Beautiful. And she’s born in 1985 (a test tube baby!), nettdagbok.no says, so she counts as “young” 😉 Among Karina’s friends I found Mia Frogner, whose site is a poem in several screenfuls with images of her (?) face evocatively set against dark golden text. The poem is in English with no explainations or anything to explain it, not even the name of the author, but the guestbook at the end of the poem is in Norwegian. [update: actually Mia’s used bits of song lyrics by Tool, with some of her own words set against them and very evocative design and images. I love it.]

Wandering on (starting as always from nettdagbok.no) I find Thale, whose an exchange student at highschool in Melbourne (marvellous Melbourne). Today her web sports little but a photo of a wombat and of course, the archives, but a link to “diktene mine” (my poems) leads to dikt.no, a community poetry site, where I find that Thale has some rather good poems, like this one, and that at dikt.no readers comment each others works and recommendations.

I’ve not frequented sites like dikt.no because I’ve been more interested in interactive, networked literature, whereas dikt.no is all about conventional poems only on the web. Perhaps I’ve been too locked into the conventional categories of works and genres. Browsing from site to site like this, finding connections and links to “my poems”, and seeing the way in which web diaries nest alongside dikt.no and each other, I’m thinking a little differently. Perhaps net literature is not simply about works that individually respond to the network or use interactivity. Perhaps I should forget about discrete works. Perhaps network literature is in between the works and throughout the works and in web diaries, community sites and links?

Karina is a member of dikt.no, too. Some of her poems are in English, perfect English for that matter: I don’t remember my friends being perfectly comfortable writing in English when we were eighteen. Except me, but English is my mother-tounge. Perhaps it’s Karina’s too – or perhaps eighteen-year-olds are more international today. I like her Norwegian poems better than the English one I read: she piles words onto each other in a way English can’t emulate. Papirengel (it matches the title of her web ) reminds me of Gro Dahle’s poems.

Clicking through to the front page of dikt.no I remember why I’ve never explored it before. It’s incredibly ugly and deeply uninviting. Perhaps my looping reading through diaries and links is the best way to enjoy a site like this?


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

2 thoughts on “norwegian net lit

  1. karina

    …I found this by coincidence, I just wanted to say thanks for the wonderful review of me 😉

    /karina

  2. Jill

    Karina! Nice to see you – and I really do love your site 🙂

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Screenshot of a paragraph from a New York Times article published May 12, 2026. Text reads: "The price of tomatoes -tart bursts of flavor in salads and sandwiches — surged nearly 40 percent in April from a year ago on a combination of bad weather, high tariffs and climbing transportation costs."
AI STORIES

Genre glitches and unexpected promotional phrases as a sign of AI writing

A genre glitch is a characteristic of LLM-assisted writing where the text suddenly switches genre, typically inserting a short promotional phrase full of sensory details into an informational text. Genre glitches occur when a word in the generated text is heavily associated with a genre or context that is markedly […]

Top of a ransom note from Shinyhunters hacking group. Text reads: "SHINYHUNTERS rooting your systems since '19 ;) ShinyHunters has breached Instructure (again). Instead of contacting us to resolve it they ignored us and did some "security patches"."
Networked Politics University politics

UiB self-hosts the open source version of Canvas, so wasn’t affected by the breach

On May 1st Canvas announced a security breach, and then yesterday the system was hacked. The login page was replaced by a ransom note: if universities don’t pay up by 12 May, student data will be released. Here’s what the login page looked like yesterday: Way back in 2015, when […]

AI and algorithmic culture Networked Politics

AI-generated images, fascist aesthetics: Dieselbrølet and Heimatstrom

My German is pretty dodgy, so when I first saw Heimatstrom on Bluesky, shared by Roland Meyer, a professor of visual culture at Universität Zürich’s Digital Society Initiative, I misinterpreted it and thought it was a far-right campaign. But no, Heimatstrom is a group of left-wing environmentalists using fascist AI […]

Photo of a billboard ad at Oslo S train station showing a smiliing conductor and the text "Du må ikke sove. Joda, bare sov du."
AI STORIES

“Du må ikke sove”: a floating motif detached from its meaning (or: LLMs can write Norwegian but miss cultural references)

There’s a new ad for the train between Stavanger and Oslo in Norway that uses a line from Arnulf Øverland’s famous anti-fascist poem Du må ikke sove (“You must not sleep”). Du må ikke sove, you must not sleep, the ad says. And then it flips it, jovially, joda, bare […]

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.