I’m giving a talk in Narvik on Monday at the literature festival. The general theme of the festival this year is youth literature, and I’ve been invited to talk about net literature since young people surf. My title is “Nettlitteratur – nye stemmer og ny teknologi”. So I’m going to talk about web diaries and blogs as literary endeavours, and show how teenagers often combine design and writing, and how the writing is often very good. I’m poking around for examples now. I’m not sure whether to show “regular” net lit or not. Mm.

I like papirepler by Karina Junker. Nice design (visually, it’s kind of cryptic to navigate and I don’t like that it’s all hidden in frames and you can’t link to bits of it, but it does look good), lovely sketches, and she writes well about choice little topics. In this long fairly mundane listed post (sorry, no design on the direct links) item 2 on the list is “hendene mine er laget av sn¯”, my hands are made of snow. There are tiny bursts of joy like that throughout the site. Look at the way she presents herself if you click her name under each post. Beautiful. And she’s born in 1985 (a test tube baby!), nettdagbok.no says, so she counts as “young” 😉 Among Karina’s friends I found Mia Frogner, whose site is a poem in several screenfuls with images of her (?) face evocatively set against dark golden text. The poem is in English with no explainations or anything to explain it, not even the name of the author, but the guestbook at the end of the poem is in Norwegian. [update: actually Mia’s used bits of song lyrics by Tool, with some of her own words set against them and very evocative design and images. I love it.]

Wandering on (starting as always from nettdagbok.no) I find Thale, whose an exchange student at highschool in Melbourne (marvellous Melbourne). Today her web sports little but a photo of a wombat and of course, the archives, but a link to “diktene mine” (my poems) leads to dikt.no, a community poetry site, where I find that Thale has some rather good poems, like this one, and that at dikt.no readers comment each others works and recommendations.

I’ve not frequented sites like dikt.no because I’ve been more interested in interactive, networked literature, whereas dikt.no is all about conventional poems only on the web. Perhaps I’ve been too locked into the conventional categories of works and genres. Browsing from site to site like this, finding connections and links to “my poems”, and seeing the way in which web diaries nest alongside dikt.no and each other, I’m thinking a little differently. Perhaps net literature is not simply about works that individually respond to the network or use interactivity. Perhaps I should forget about discrete works. Perhaps network literature is in between the works and throughout the works and in web diaries, community sites and links?

Karina is a member of dikt.no, too. Some of her poems are in English, perfect English for that matter: I don’t remember my friends being perfectly comfortable writing in English when we were eighteen. Except me, but English is my mother-tounge. Perhaps it’s Karina’s too – or perhaps eighteen-year-olds are more international today. I like her Norwegian poems better than the English one I read: she piles words onto each other in a way English can’t emulate. Papirengel (it matches the title of her web ) reminds me of Gro Dahle’s poems.

Clicking through to the front page of dikt.no I remember why I’ve never explored it before. It’s incredibly ugly and deeply uninviting. Perhaps my looping reading through diaries and links is the best way to enjoy a site like this?


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

2 thoughts on “norwegian net lit

  1. karina

    …I found this by coincidence, I just wanted to say thanks for the wonderful review of me 😉

    /karina

  2. Jill

    Karina! Nice to see you – and I really do love your site 🙂

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

AI STORIES

AI-generated stories have longer endings than human stories

My colleague Jessica Witte has just shared a preprint where she compared the emotional arcs of the stories we generated using gpt-4o-mini to those of human-authored (pre-2022) stories from the subreddit r/WritingPrompts, conveniently gathered in this dataset. She found a distinct difference in the endings of the LLM-generated stories: both […]

How to peer review a paper in 2026

Dorothy Bishop, a psychologist, wrote a useful list of what reviewers need to look out now that so many papers are bad science that looks good thanks to LLMs. Read her whole blog post, she explains it well, but here’s a brief version because I’m pretty sure we’ll be needing […]

“So what if it was ChatGPT? It *could* have been true!”

I recently read a good article on the different kinds of truth a language model operates with by Luke Mann, Liam Magee and Vanicka Arora, Truth Machines: Synthesizing Veracity in AI Language Models, but despite its lovely typology of truths (consensus, correspondence, coherence and pragmatic) it doesn’t help me with […]

AI STORIES

AI shimmer and sparkle

I have this hunch that sparkles and glow and shimmer are somehow a point in the latent spaces of LLMs that have more connections than you would expect. Perhaps their connotation to magic and to the unknown matches some of the mystique of genAI? Or perhaps these words are used […]

Don’t do a systematic review if you’re in the humanities

This paper is a great example of why you probably shouldn’t use a systematic literature review for a theoretical and conceptual research question like “How does artificial intelligence affect the perception of authenticity and aura in art?” However, if you’re looking for an annotated list of 48 recent articles about […]