If you haven’t already looked at Mena Trott’s post announcing that Moveable Type 3.0 will suddenly be, well, rather expensive, really, go check out the awesome list of trackbacks. Customers talk back – on the corporate website. Wow.

I note with amusement that my use of Moveable Type with my students isn’t even on the pricing list – US$699 is the maximum price, and that only covers 20 authors and 15 blogs. I have 55 active blogs with an author each in my installation. Moveable Type handles it, but obviously it’s not built to make administration of that many users and blogs easy, and indeed, it is a pain. I think it’s fine to charge for software, but suddenly going from free (beer not speech) to pay without warning isn’t that cool. And given the software doesn’t work very well for the purpose, that price – or whatever they’d charge – is too steep. There’s no way I’m going to ask my students to install Moveable Type themselves again, so I guess next year’s web design students won’t be using Moveable Type. Anyway, the default templates are really complicated for students to figure out, and there’s the spam issue, which admittedly might be improved with the new version.

WordPress has been recommended by several (it’s recommended in half the trackbacks to Mena’s post), and it’s GPL which is good. My university’s already installed Simplog (previously called MyPHPblog, and websited here), but with little info about features). Simplog is open source too. It’s simple alright, perhaps too simple – last time I checked you couldn’t edit templates, only choose from a list of presets – but I notice the new version has trackbacks and comments and it would (gloriously) require absolutely no administration from me.

Our university’s committed to using open source software (at least, that’s the theory) so I really should switch, I guess.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

8 thoughts on “moveable type teaching too expensive

  1. lisa

    Liz Lawley was in touch with the SixApart folk today and it appears they will try to facilitate an educational pricing plan.

    I wonder, though, if having students sign up for TypePad might be less work and more cost-effective.

  2. steve

    Next year, I’m leaning toward using Textpattern to create a single blog on which each student has a section of their own, but all posts aggregate on the class page. I really like the idea of personal spaces and a group space together, and I want the blog use to emphasize conversation rather than individual reflection (though some of that, too, hopefully).

  3. Frank

    The nice thing about open source software is that you can pay a programmer to tailor that software exactly to your needs (easier user management for instance) instead of putting that money towards a licence for a commercial package that will sort-of-but-not-quite do what you want it to.

    Of course there’s never much money in teaching budgets in the first place and apart from that overly controlling licensing scheme SixApart would be a good company to support financially, but on the other hand, going with open source, you would enable a local programmer to make a living from open source software, allowing him or her to contribute to the OSS community in turn.

  4. Liz

    The educational pricing issue will be the deciding factor in whether I switch. Anil assured me that they really want to encourage, not discourage, educational use, and that their educational licensing will reflect that. I hope so.

    The problem with WordPress, from what I can see, is that it doesn’t allow multiple blogs–something I need for the courseware.

    I will see if TextPattern’s “sections” could work for that purpose…Steve, I’ll be interested to hear what your experiences are.

  5. Thomas

    How about just staying with the 2.6x version? You don’t HAVE to upgrade and pay, or…?

  6. heather

    i posted this over at liz lawley’s blog, but wanted to know what you thought too… with as many users as a class would have- maybe you’d find advantages in Drupal? … it has built-in support for multiple single author blogs.

    Kairos news makes good use of this feature: http://kairosnews.org/blog

    Druapl also has modules (like plugins) that people build, which are made for group communication. like who’s online, and a forum, etc. (these are optional installations)

  7. Blinger

    I have moved on to Expression Engine as I was fortunate enough to get one of their free giveaways on Friday/Saturday. But I was already looking at a couple of different platforms for use with my own students.

    I would suggest you take a look at B2evolution as it is free and supports user self-registration. The best place to go is http://opensourcecms.com as there are free demo’s of several different portals/blogging software.

    Good luck with your decision.

  8. Jeff

    Don’t forget about COREBlog from Zope. Its open source. I would be happy to give you a password to look around in my installation.

    My blog is actually a home brew but I host COREBLogs for others including http://elili.com and http://maggieclare.com

    Let me know if your interested in viewing admin sections.

    Good luck.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Screenshot of a paragraph from a New York Times article published May 12, 2026. Text reads: "The price of tomatoes -tart bursts of flavor in salads and sandwiches — surged nearly 40 percent in April from a year ago on a combination of bad weather, high tariffs and climbing transportation costs."
AI STORIES

Genre glitches and unexpected promotional phrases as a sign of AI writing

A genre glitch is a characteristic of LLM-assisted writing where the text suddenly switches genre, typically inserting a short promotional phrase full of sensory details into an informational text. Genre glitches occur when a word in the generated text is heavily associated with a genre or context that is markedly […]

Top of a ransom note from Shinyhunters hacking group. Text reads: "SHINYHUNTERS rooting your systems since '19 ;) ShinyHunters has breached Instructure (again). Instead of contacting us to resolve it they ignored us and did some "security patches"."
Networked Politics University politics

UiB self-hosts the open source version of Canvas, so wasn’t affected by the breach

On May 1st Canvas announced a security breach, and then yesterday the system was hacked. The login page was replaced by a ransom note: if universities don’t pay up by 12 May, student data will be released. Here’s what the login page looked like yesterday: Way back in 2015, when […]

AI and algorithmic culture Networked Politics

AI-generated images, fascist aesthetics: Dieselbrølet and Heimatstrom

My German is pretty dodgy, so when I first saw Heimatstrom on Bluesky, shared by Roland Meyer, a professor of visual culture at Universität Zürich’s Digital Society Initiative, I misinterpreted it and thought it was a far-right campaign. But no, Heimatstrom is a group of left-wing environmentalists using fascist AI […]

Photo of a billboard ad at Oslo S train station showing a smiliing conductor and the text "Du må ikke sove. Joda, bare sov du."
AI STORIES

“Du må ikke sove”: a floating motif detached from its meaning (or: LLMs can write Norwegian but miss cultural references)

There’s a new ad for the train between Stavanger and Oslo in Norway that uses a line from Arnulf Øverland’s famous anti-fascist poem Du må ikke sove (“You must not sleep”). Du må ikke sove, you must not sleep, the ad says. And then it flips it, jovially, joda, bare […]

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.