I haven’t been reading Francis Strand’s weblog How to learn Swedish in 1000 difficult lessons recently, and coming across it again I’m amazed, again, at the skill and calm with which it is written. It’s a wonderful example of a narrative weblog. Rather than the long serial narrative that you see in Flight Risk, where each post fits into a complicated over-arching plot, Francis Strand’s blog consists of micro-narratives. You can appreciate each post independently, which means that I can easily come back after not reading it for a few months and feel right at home. Flight Risk, on the other hand, frightens me off with the mass of archives I’ll have to read to catch up with the storyline. It’s serial, but still bound to the notion of a whole work where readers are expected to read right from the start.

How to learn Swedish has a very simple but effective method of tying posts together: each post is concluded with the Swedish word for the day. What a brilliant strategy. It’s the perfect excuse for the title of the weblog, and reinforces the theme of the weblog, which is written by an American in Stockholm, who often experiences the strangeness of a different culture. It’s a a refreshing variant of metaphor, becuase of course the words chosen reflect the theme of each post. And it creates a rhythm of variations on a set theme.

Many webloggers post micronarratives now and then. Francis Strand does it all the time.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

3 thoughts on “micro-narratives in blogs

  1. francis s.

    Aw, shucks. I’m all pink and blushing. Thanks for the grand compliment, Jill!

  2. Jill

    🙂

  3. OnePotMeal

    The rhythm of variations
    Deep in the depths of my hard drive this morning, as it rains outside and my hydrophobic dog refuses to go for a walk, I found a list of things I intended to write about here before my connection went on the fritz a couple of weeks ago. Some of them we…

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

AI STORIES

AI-generated stories have longer endings than human stories

My colleague Jessica Witte has just shared a preprint where she compared the emotional arcs of the stories we generated using gpt-4o-mini to those of human-authored (pre-2022) stories from the subreddit r/WritingPrompts, conveniently gathered in this dataset. She found a distinct difference in the endings of the LLM-generated stories: both […]

How to peer review a paper in 2026

Dorothy Bishop, a psychologist, wrote a useful list of what reviewers need to look out now that so many papers are bad science that looks good thanks to LLMs. Read her whole blog post, she explains it well, but here’s a brief version because I’m pretty sure we’ll be needing […]

“So what if it was ChatGPT? It *could* have been true!”

I recently read a good article on the different kinds of truth a language model operates with by Luke Mann, Liam Magee and Vanicka Arora, Truth Machines: Synthesizing Veracity in AI Language Models, but despite its lovely typology of truths (consensus, correspondence, coherence and pragmatic) it doesn’t help me with […]

AI STORIES

AI shimmer and sparkle

I have this hunch that sparkles and glow and shimmer are somehow a point in the latent spaces of LLMs that have more connections than you would expect. Perhaps their connotation to magic and to the unknown matches some of the mystique of genAI? Or perhaps these words are used […]

Don’t do a systematic review if you’re in the humanities

This paper is a great example of why you probably shouldn’t use a systematic literature review for a theoretical and conceptual research question like “How does artificial intelligence affect the perception of authenticity and aura in art?” However, if you’re looking for an annotated list of 48 recent articles about […]