Read Dr. Crazy’s take on making sensible choices rather than letting life just “happen” to you:

As I look at my students, I often think I’d have been better off to let my life “happen” to me. Why? Because you can get an education at any time. You can get an education after you have your 11 kids, you can get an education after your divorce, you can get an education after you have a parent die. You can choose education, whatever you’ve done before. By choosing education first, it means I’ve not chosen other things. And it means that it makes those other things harder. And that is a rude fucking awakening.

I’ve been incredibly fortunate in life (I’m so happy now!), although there were certainly rough patches. Today people are often startled to hear I have an eleven-year-old daughter (no, I wasn’t a baby, I turned 25 the year she was born, and she was planned and much desired), but really, I think she fit into my life-career schedule just perfectly.

I’ve always found my mother’s career-path inspiring. She did a PhD in the seventies, but, well, I suppose actually part of the problem was that the jobs weren’t where we were. But when my sister and I were 10 or 12 or so, she retrained – starting from high school level physics, which girls couldn’t take in her day – all the way up to an engineering degree and working on an MA in physics. She’s been enjoying her career in engineering ever since. Several of her friends have done similar career reversals. I really like to know that if I ever get sick of blogs and/or academia, I could always become an engineer – or a pilot, or an architect, or anything really. Would only take a few years’ studying.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

4 thoughts on “making choices

  1. […] I don’t know if I have it in me to go through so many moves for so long, and this is really putting a damper on my excitement about job announcements this year. But… I’d like to think I’ll have Jill Walker’s attitude if it comes down to it: I may be facing a similar kind of choice as her mother made, leaving behind many of the things I trained for in getting a Ph.D. […]

  2. Norman Hanscombe

    I can speak only for Australian conditions, but being born in 1935 meant I lived through the beginning of an era in which opportunities of all kinds have increased dramatically. I was conscious of how much easier it was for people from all backgrounds [and both sexes] to obtain a better education, for example, than had ever been the case before.

    The only problem is our “needs” have continued to increase at even faster rates than everything else, meaning levels of dissatisfaction are significantly higher than was the case in the past. Still, grumbling gives us all a goal in life. Including, I guess, me grumbling about grumbling?

  3. […] Lately I’ve been thinking again about some of Jill Walker’s, Clancy Ratliff’s and Dr. Crazy’s posts about academia and the choices it forces people to make, written in the fall. I’ve been ambivalent about academia for a long time. I love ideas, I love to do research, to write and teach, and I don’t much mind committee work either. It’s all part of being a member of a particular kind of community, which one tries to be when working… anywhere. […]

  4. […] Lately I’ve been thinking again about some of Jill Walker’s, Clancy Ratliff’s and Dr. Crazy’s posts about academia and the choices it forces people to make, written in the fall. I’ve been ambivalent about academia for a long time. I love ideas, I love to do research, to write and teach, and I don’t much mind committee work either. It’s all part of being a member of a particular kind of community, which one tries to be when working… anywhere. […]

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Screenshot of a paragraph from a New York Times article published May 12, 2026. Text reads: "The price of tomatoes -tart bursts of flavor in salads and sandwiches — surged nearly 40 percent in April from a year ago on a combination of bad weather, high tariffs and climbing transportation costs."
AI STORIES

Genre glitches and unexpected promotional phrases as a sign of AI writing

A genre glitch is a characteristic of LLM-assisted writing where the text suddenly switches genre, typically inserting a short promotional phrase full of sensory details into an informational text. Genre glitches occur when a word in the generated text is heavily associated with a genre or context that is markedly […]

Top of a ransom note from Shinyhunters hacking group. Text reads: "SHINYHUNTERS rooting your systems since '19 ;) ShinyHunters has breached Instructure (again). Instead of contacting us to resolve it they ignored us and did some "security patches"."
Networked Politics University politics

UiB self-hosts the open source version of Canvas, so wasn’t affected by the breach

On May 1st Canvas announced a security breach, and then yesterday the system was hacked. The login page was replaced by a ransom note: if universities don’t pay up by 12 May, student data will be released. Here’s what the login page looked like yesterday: Way back in 2015, when […]

AI and algorithmic culture Networked Politics

AI-generated images, fascist aesthetics: Dieselbrølet and Heimatstrom

My German is pretty dodgy, so when I first saw Heimatstrom on Bluesky, shared by Roland Meyer, a professor of visual culture at Universität Zürich’s Digital Society Initiative, I misinterpreted it and thought it was a far-right campaign. But no, Heimatstrom is a group of left-wing environmentalists using fascist AI […]

Photo of a billboard ad at Oslo S train station showing a smiliing conductor and the text "Du må ikke sove. Joda, bare sov du."
AI STORIES

“Du må ikke sove”: a floating motif detached from its meaning (or: LLMs can write Norwegian but miss cultural references)

There’s a new ad for the train between Stavanger and Oslo in Norway that uses a line from Arnulf Øverland’s famous anti-fascist poem Du må ikke sove (“You must not sleep”). Du må ikke sove, you must not sleep, the ad says. And then it flips it, jovially, joda, bare […]

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.