Read Dr. Crazy’s take on making sensible choices rather than letting life just “happen” to you:

As I look at my students, I often think I’d have been better off to let my life “happen” to me. Why? Because you can get an education at any time. You can get an education after you have your 11 kids, you can get an education after your divorce, you can get an education after you have a parent die. You can choose education, whatever you’ve done before. By choosing education first, it means I’ve not chosen other things. And it means that it makes those other things harder. And that is a rude fucking awakening.

I’ve been incredibly fortunate in life (I’m so happy now!), although there were certainly rough patches. Today people are often startled to hear I have an eleven-year-old daughter (no, I wasn’t a baby, I turned 25 the year she was born, and she was planned and much desired), but really, I think she fit into my life-career schedule just perfectly.

I’ve always found my mother’s career-path inspiring. She did a PhD in the seventies, but, well, I suppose actually part of the problem was that the jobs weren’t where we were. But when my sister and I were 10 or 12 or so, she retrained – starting from high school level physics, which girls couldn’t take in her day – all the way up to an engineering degree and working on an MA in physics. She’s been enjoying her career in engineering ever since. Several of her friends have done similar career reversals. I really like to know that if I ever get sick of blogs and/or academia, I could always become an engineer – or a pilot, or an architect, or anything really. Would only take a few years’ studying.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

4 thoughts on “making choices

  1. […] I don’t know if I have it in me to go through so many moves for so long, and this is really putting a damper on my excitement about job announcements this year. But… I’d like to think I’ll have Jill Walker’s attitude if it comes down to it: I may be facing a similar kind of choice as her mother made, leaving behind many of the things I trained for in getting a Ph.D. […]

  2. Norman Hanscombe

    I can speak only for Australian conditions, but being born in 1935 meant I lived through the beginning of an era in which opportunities of all kinds have increased dramatically. I was conscious of how much easier it was for people from all backgrounds [and both sexes] to obtain a better education, for example, than had ever been the case before.

    The only problem is our “needs” have continued to increase at even faster rates than everything else, meaning levels of dissatisfaction are significantly higher than was the case in the past. Still, grumbling gives us all a goal in life. Including, I guess, me grumbling about grumbling?

  3. […] Lately I’ve been thinking again about some of Jill Walker’s, Clancy Ratliff’s and Dr. Crazy’s posts about academia and the choices it forces people to make, written in the fall. I’ve been ambivalent about academia for a long time. I love ideas, I love to do research, to write and teach, and I don’t much mind committee work either. It’s all part of being a member of a particular kind of community, which one tries to be when working… anywhere. […]

  4. […] Lately I’ve been thinking again about some of Jill Walker’s, Clancy Ratliff’s and Dr. Crazy’s posts about academia and the choices it forces people to make, written in the fall. I’ve been ambivalent about academia for a long time. I love ideas, I love to do research, to write and teach, and I don’t much mind committee work either. It’s all part of being a member of a particular kind of community, which one tries to be when working… anywhere. […]

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

AI STORIES

AI-generated stories have longer endings than human stories

My colleague Jessica Witte has just shared a preprint where she compared the emotional arcs of the stories we generated using gpt-4o-mini to those of human-authored (pre-2022) stories from the subreddit r/WritingPrompts, conveniently gathered in this dataset. She found a distinct difference in the endings of the LLM-generated stories: both […]

How to peer review a paper in 2026

Dorothy Bishop, a psychologist, wrote a useful list of what reviewers need to look out now that so many papers are bad science that looks good thanks to LLMs. Read her whole blog post, she explains it well, but here’s a brief version because I’m pretty sure we’ll be needing […]

“So what if it was ChatGPT? It *could* have been true!”

I recently read a good article on the different kinds of truth a language model operates with by Luke Mann, Liam Magee and Vanicka Arora, Truth Machines: Synthesizing Veracity in AI Language Models, but despite its lovely typology of truths (consensus, correspondence, coherence and pragmatic) it doesn’t help me with […]

AI STORIES

AI shimmer and sparkle

I have this hunch that sparkles and glow and shimmer are somehow a point in the latent spaces of LLMs that have more connections than you would expect. Perhaps their connotation to magic and to the unknown matches some of the mystique of genAI? Or perhaps these words are used […]

Don’t do a systematic review if you’re in the humanities

This paper is a great example of why you probably shouldn’t use a systematic literature review for a theoretical and conceptual research question like “How does artificial intelligence affect the perception of authenticity and aura in art?” However, if you’re looking for an annotated list of 48 recent articles about […]