Terje Hillesund is talking about reading digital texts right now. He’s recapped what we did last time we met, and proposes the projects presented last time can be seen from the side of the readers that will use them, who will be reading in one of two ways:

  • Intentional reading: the kind of reading we do when we read novels. We’re intentionally seeking out a text and expect to spend some time with it.
  • Functional reading: We read almost constantly when we work and/or play on computers, but the reading isn’t the main point. (I might not have understood this fully – at first it sounds obvious, but is reading ever the main point? Reading a novel is the reading the main objective, or experiencing the language and gaining insight into the plot and characters? Maybe this is nitpicking.)

The more intentional the reading is, the greater the need for an interpretation standard. OpenReader is one effort to achieve standards for electronic documents so they can be read on any platform. For instance, L’Echo de la fabrique, for instance, intentional reading is dominant, and a specific system that is optimised for reading would be optimal. A web browser is not enough. The Wittgenstein Archives, on the other hand, is too complex for OpenReader. The Ibsen project needs specialised, standardised reading software because there’s lots of intentional reading. The corpus databases, on the other hand, deal in functional reading and do not really need a specialised reading platform.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Triple book talk: Watch James Dobson, Jussi Parikka and me discuss our 2023 books

Thanks to everyone who came to the triple book talk of three recent books on machine vision by James Dobson, Jussi Parikka and me, and thanks for excellent questions. Several people have emailed to asked if we recorded it, and yes we did! Here you go! James and Jussi’s books […]

Image on a black background of a human hand holding a graphic showing the word AI with a blue circuit board pattern inside surrounded by blurred blue and yellow dots and a concentric circular blue design.
AI and algorithmic culture Machine Vision

Four visual registers for imaginaries of machine vision

I’m thrilled to announce another publication from our European Research Council (ERC)-funded research project on Machine Vision: Gabriele de Setaand Anya Shchetvina‘s paper analysing how Chinese AI companies visually present machine vision technologies. They find that the Chinese machine vision imaginary is global, blue and competitive.  De Seta, Gabriele, and Anya Shchetvina. “Imagining Machine […]

Do people flock to talks about ChatGPT because they are scared?

Whenever I give talks about ChatGPT and LLMs, whether to ninth graders, businesses or journalists, I meet people who are hungry for information, who really want to understand this new technology. I’ve interpreted this as interest and a need to understand – but yesterday, Eirik Solheim said that every time […]