The immigration queue at JFK snakes back and forth between black straps drawn from pole to pole. If you’re on a plane arriving from Europe, each lap takes ten minutes, and a jumbo jet’s worth of aliens fills five laps. The last couple of laps will be faster because the US citizens will have finished and the aliens get to use their lanes. If you can get a seat at the front of the plane, you’ll save at least half an hour compared to that poor sucker in seat 43E.

Cameras and mobile phones are forbidden. There is, of course, no wireless. You must fill out a form; your signature waives all your rights. A sign explains that US officials will fingerprint you and take your photograph. If you have any concerns about how your data will be handled, don’t ask anyone at the airport, the sign states, instead you should contact the privacy officer at usvisitprivacy@dhs.gov.

The television is always on and tuned to a news broadcast dissecting a recent sex crime or serial killing. Eyewitness News last time, CNN this, and the difference between them is suprisingly small: hardly any information is given, but much time is spent considering the horror of the crime. Every time I come here I have plenty of time to wonder whether this is a carefully planned element of the arrival experience. Is it a warning, perhaps: aliens, we catch criminals. Perhaps it’s part of the be scared campaign? Or is it a horrible misstep, an unintentional reinforcement of our simplistic stereotypes of America?

My friends have had bad experiences with immigration officers, but for some reason they’re always polite and friendly to me and never question me beyond a simple “what is the purpose of your visit?” Pleasure, I tell them, delighting in the vibration of the [ʒ] against my tongue, and they type seriously, staring at their screens. I lean forward to try to see what information about me is displayed but I can’t read the screen from the side. “Welcome to the United States”, they say, and let me through the gates.

I grab my bag and am greeted by a huge city, smiles, noise, lights, people and my boyfriend.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

4 thoughts on “immigration impressions

  1. Toril

    Enjoy your little R&R as a European ‘alien’ in that funny country ‘over there’!!
    And by the way, CNN was never any good, I don’t think they know how to present
    the recent news (or indeed what news is), they are more like a cheap gossip
    magazine! But I will not get too opinionated, I just want you to enjoy yourself,
    and focus on the smiles.

  2. Matt

    You story made me smile. Thanks for lightening my day.

  3. Jose Angel

    Didn’t they check your email? The other day Joi Ito said that an email reading system was being implemented at US customs in order to scan your mail folder for possible suspect connections… maybe you don’t look like the average terrrorist? I remember the first time I went through the UK customs they looked even inside my sandwiches (yep, I know, I should have eaten them beforehand, but that might look suspicious…)

  4. Jill

    I imagine US immigration would sooner Google me than ask me to tell them my email address. I find that email-reading story hard to believe, but who knows?

    Ah well.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Top of a ransom note from Shinyhunters hacking group. Text reads: "SHINYHUNTERS rooting your systems since '19 ;) ShinyHunters has breached Instructure (again). Instead of contacting us to resolve it they ignored us and did some "security patches"."
Networked Politics University politics

UiB self-hosts the open source version of Canvas, so wasn’t affected by the breach

On May 1st Canvas announced a security breach, and then yesterday the system was hacked. The login page was replaced by a ransom note: if universities don’t pay up by 12 May, student data will be released. Here’s what the login page looked like yesterday: Way back in 2015, when […]

AI and algorithmic culture Networked Politics

AI-generated images, fascist aesthetics: Dieselbrølet and Heimatstrom

My German is pretty dodgy, so when I first saw Heimatstrom on Bluesky, shared by Roland Meyer, a professor of visual culture at Universität Zürich’s Digital Society Initiative, I misinterpreted it and thought it was a far-right campaign. But no, Heimatstrom is a group of left-wing environmentalists using fascist AI […]

Photo of a billboard ad at Oslo S train station showing a smiliing conductor and the text "Du må ikke sove. Joda, bare sov du."
AI STORIES

“Du må ikke sove”: a floating motif detached from its meaning (or: LLMs can write Norwegian but miss cultural references)

There’s a new ad for the train between Stavanger and Oslo in Norway that uses a line from Arnulf Øverland’s famous anti-fascist poem Du må ikke sove (“You must not sleep”). Du må ikke sove, you must not sleep, the ad says. And then it flips it, jovially, joda, bare […]

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.