Scott sent me an article about identity online from the Baltimore Sun where we’re both quoted – Scott from a half-hour conversation with the journalist (I assume many of the ideas in the piece came from this) and me from an academic paper I wrote. That’s a first, a journalist quoting an article I’ve written – I love it! They even give me an interesting new identity of “Swiss academic”! I wonder what I’d be like if I were? Anyway, this reminds me of the article Marika mentioned the other day, JosÈ van Dijck’s article ‘From shoebox to performative agent: the computer as personal memory machine’ (New media and society 7 (3)). My research fortnight starts tomorrow. No teaching! not in the office! When in the office, my phone now rings on average three times an hour and someone knocks on my door twice an hour. Probably this is partly due to the start of semester, which means lots of students with questions, but a lot of it is general administration stuff too. I like people and this is clearly part of my job but it’s not condusive to focussed work of any sort, least of all research – and that’s part of my job too… Anyway, I’m going to read a lot. Here’s what I’ll be reading:

  • The aforementioned article by JosÈ¥van Dijck.
  • N. Katherine Hayles: My Mother Was a Computer: Digital Subjects and Literary Texts
  • Mark Hansen: New Philosophy for New Media (not sure yet how relevant this will be so I’ll see how much of it I read
  • Gunther Kress & Theo van Leeuwen: Multimodal Discourse (because it’s about time, though I think I already know the content I’d better be sure, I mean, even Anders’s students are reading it)
  • Some online e-lit and such. Haven’t selected it yet.
  • Should I figure out what that post-theory stuff is, or is it already out of date?

I feel like I haven’t just read in years. Can’t wait.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

3 thoughts on “identity online and reading list

  1. Kjerstin

    I’m not sure whether I should be sorry that this is the only time you’ve had you academic work quoted by a journalist, og congratulate you that it’s happened at all. Of course academic papers are seldom quotation friendly, but I’m also afraid it has something to do with how often journalists actually turn to the written sources…

  2. Jill

    Well, to be fair to journalists, their jobs are pretty hectic, and I can see why they don’t have time to read every article an academic wrote before interviewing them – sometimes they could sure do a little more research first though.

  3. Knud

    Jill Walker, the second most famous swiss name after Heidi!

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

AI STORIES

AI-generated stories have longer endings than human stories

My colleague Jessica Witte has just shared a preprint where she compared the emotional arcs of the stories we generated using gpt-4o-mini to those of human-authored (pre-2022) stories from the subreddit r/WritingPrompts, conveniently gathered in this dataset. She found a distinct difference in the endings of the LLM-generated stories: both […]

How to peer review a paper in 2026

Dorothy Bishop, a psychologist, wrote a useful list of what reviewers need to look out now that so many papers are bad science that looks good thanks to LLMs. Read her whole blog post, she explains it well, but here’s a brief version because I’m pretty sure we’ll be needing […]

“So what if it was ChatGPT? It *could* have been true!”

I recently read a good article on the different kinds of truth a language model operates with by Luke Mann, Liam Magee and Vanicka Arora, Truth Machines: Synthesizing Veracity in AI Language Models, but despite its lovely typology of truths (consensus, correspondence, coherence and pragmatic) it doesn’t help me with […]

AI STORIES

AI shimmer and sparkle

I have this hunch that sparkles and glow and shimmer are somehow a point in the latent spaces of LLMs that have more connections than you would expect. Perhaps their connotation to magic and to the unknown matches some of the mystique of genAI? Or perhaps these words are used […]

Don’t do a systematic review if you’re in the humanities

This paper is a great example of why you probably shouldn’t use a systematic literature review for a theoretical and conceptual research question like “How does artificial intelligence affect the perception of authenticity and aura in art?” However, if you’re looking for an annotated list of 48 recent articles about […]