I’ve developed an inability to get anything but administrative work done in my office.

There are practical reasons. My phone rings, people knock on my door, and of course they have issues that need to be dealt with immediately. Since three of the 4 1/2 tenured lecturers have left our department in the last two years, and we have yet to INSERT two of them, and another is on sabbatical (though he’s been pitching in a lot more than he should) the department is taking a lot of work right now. It’s running OK on the day-to-day level, sort of, with lots of help from people being hired 6 months at a time (sigh), but for there to be any sustainable future a lot of alliances need to be built and choices made and agreements come to and it’s really time-consuming work that screams out to be done immediately.

Yet I’m only paid to do about seven hours of administration a week. Yes, that’s taking the lower course load because I’m heading the department into consideration. I actually think seven hours would be realistic now I’ve got a handle on how stuff works, if we weren’t trying to rebuild the department and if there were enough other tenured staff members that I could delegate the things that are supposed to be delegated: you’re in charge of international students, you’re in charge of keeping track of research, you’re in charge of keeping track of teaching in general, you coordinate the MA program and answer all their questions and know who’s writing about what and hunt down supervisors not doing their jobs and coordinate external examiners when they hand in their theses and make sure the courses work together, you coordinate the undergrads, you pay attention to what the IT department’s centralisation will entail for the rest of us. No, we don’t need an individual for each task but the system isn’t set up for one person to do everything.

I’m really sick of not getting any research done except when I’m travelling. So this morning, instead of going in to the office I’m home, ignoring my email and finishing up – well, not research exactly. Just getting permissions to reprint pictures in my paper on distributed narrative for the AoIR Annual, which has taken an hour because of its stickliness. See, even research comes with fiddly bits!


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

screenshot of blogpost from sept 11, 2001, about blogger.com showing blog posts about the attacks
Networked Politics social media

25 years since September 11

I’ve been reading through my blog posts on September 11, 2001 and the days that followed. The things that stand out to me – in addition to the horror of the attack itself – are how massively we (or at least I) used the web to understand what was happening, […]

AI STORIES

AI-generated stories have longer endings than human stories

My colleague Jessica Witte has just shared a preprint where she compared the emotional arcs of the stories we generated using gpt-4o-mini to those of human-authored (pre-2022) stories from the subreddit r/WritingPrompts, conveniently gathered in this dataset. She found a distinct difference in the endings of the LLM-generated stories: both […]

How to peer review a paper in 2026

Dorothy Bishop, a psychologist, wrote a useful list of what reviewers need to look out now that so many papers are bad science that looks good thanks to LLMs. Read her whole blog post, she explains it well, but here’s a brief version because I’m pretty sure we’ll be needing […]

“So what if it was ChatGPT? It *could* have been true!”

I recently read a good article on the different kinds of truth a language model operates with by Luke Mann, Liam Magee and Vanicka Arora, Truth Machines: Synthesizing Veracity in AI Language Models, but despite its lovely typology of truths (consensus, correspondence, coherence and pragmatic) it doesn’t help me with […]

AI STORIES

AI shimmer and sparkle

I have this hunch that sparkles and glow and shimmer are somehow a point in the latent spaces of LLMs that have more connections than you would expect. Perhaps their connotation to magic and to the unknown matches some of the mystique of genAI? Or perhaps these words are used […]