I’ve never met the head of the mathematics department here at the University of Bergen, but I already like him because he has a “head of department blog” that is exactly the kind of thing I think a head of department should do and yet I don’t seem to do it myself. I must have clicked some link on that blog by mistake because when time came to shut down all my programs so I can play World of Warcraft with as little computer-multi-tasking as possible, my address book was asking me if it should add this visit card. Belonging to the mathematician, “Karl Ove Hufthammer”, with the nickname “Huftis” noted and his homepage: huftis.org. Now this website seems to belong to a mathematics student, but you know, I had time so I went there, of course, and would you believe it, he has info on high-quality, free computer games, on XHTML and on how to correctly address letters to the US so they get to their destination as fast as possible.

My Christmas parcels took three and a half weeks to cross the Atlantic, and my letters routinely take 8 days while letters in the other direction only take five. So I had a look.

Turns out you should run your address through the official, computer-calibrated US address normaliser, leave everything in capitals and preferably use a computer to print your envelope so that its fellow computers in the US Postal Service can read the address more easily. And here I was thinking I wanted my letters to look human. Foolish. Human-looking addresses aren’t worth having your Christmas presents arrive in January.

I admit I did wonder what would drive anyone to write such a carefully crafted page about address normalisation of all things. The links at the bottom of the page to the hundred page manuals that exist on the topic give a hint, and the dry remark that accompanies the links more: “Personally I find a certain perverted joy in reading bar codes ‘by hand’.”

Anyway, letters from me to the US will henceforth be more precise, less human and faster.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

9 thoughts on “have you heard of address normalisation?

  1. Radagast

    What’s on the head of department blog that you like so much? I can’t read a word of it …

  2. Yoram Chisik

    I actually have heard of address normalisation 🙂 In a previous incarnation I dealt with Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and address normalization is quite big in that field. There is an awful lot of variance in the way people write addresses thereby causing no end of trouble to software systems trying to resolve the stuff. By write I mean the way in which they format the address, assuming all of them are printed on high DPI laser printers (which we know not to be true).

    Address normalisation is simply the act of trying to resolve all of this variety into a standard format which software can than use. This is of primary importance to routing people like postal carriers, people who run fleets such as repairman and anyone who needs to make house/office calls and marketing people although I am sure I have left some interested parties out.

    To compound matters, there is no universal normal address, each country has its own rules, and sometimes more than one set of rules (new rules enacted but old rules still in effect for a “couple” of years)

    Anyways the address normalizer link for the US you have does a good job as it has all of the info required and clear printing never hurt any OCR software I know of. To possibly add a bit of ooomph to your letters to the US you can add a delivery point barcode to your address. If you use Microsoft office it is supposed to do this for you, I try to restrict my dabbling in the occult but you can find the instructions here:

    http://office.microsoft.com/en-au/assistance/HP051861181033.aspx

    If you need info on other countries, the postal services of a lot of them have web sites with info on how to properly structure an address.

  3. Elin

    I’m just wondering why Europe seem to get mail off fast enough and yet there is no such “system” in use? Or is there?
    The US postal services are famous for being quirky, lousy, unrelable and aggravating to deal with. If all our mail goes through the dumbo machines, I’m starting to understand why!

  4. Clancy

    I’d heard some years back that we were supposed to eliminate punctuation and lowercase letters from our addresses when we mail stuff, but I’d never heard it called “address normalization” before, and I didn’t know why this rule had been instituted.

  5. Steve Shimanek

    Ok, fair enough, you can pick on the US postal service in Norway; but if I ever hear a French person make the slightest remark about it I’m going to “go postal,” i.e. berserk. In a lifetime of sending and receiving mail in the US, I never had a single letter or package go astray; in France in two years, I’ve had nearly a dozen go missing (the digital camera I ordered was almost certainly stolen from a routing center; but the Little Red Riding Hood cloth diaper from the US, as well as the packages from the Netherlands, UK, Ireland, and France, remain unexplained). Oh, and hi Jill, hope you are well.

  6. Elin

    I’ve certainly had packages gone astray in the US. Astray, lost, delayed – you name it. Try calling them to sort it out – that’s about the worst thing you can do: Most of the time this confuses them further, and the package goes off in the complete opposite direction. Glad you had better luck..

  7. Yoram Chisik

    Just goes to show you that a computer or any other system is just as good as the people who design/maintain them. To really foul things up you need a human being. As for the US Postal Service in 10 years I have had no cause for complaint, which is something I definitely can not say about the postal service in Israel where delivery seems to depend entirely on the personal whim of the postal carriers, who may or may not feel up to the task and when they do opt to show up they may upon further reflection decide that leaving the mail for a four apartment building under a stone in the garden is an acceptable alternative to stuffing said items into the residents individual mailboxes.

  8. Claus

    > and on how to correctly address letters to the US

    I think that I got the idea, but do you know of a good online translation tool that translates this into English? (Google doesn’t support Norwegian > English.) I couldn’t find one myself.

  9. Jill

    No idea, Claus, sorry.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Screenshot of a paragraph from a New York Times article published May 12, 2026. Text reads: "The price of tomatoes -tart bursts of flavor in salads and sandwiches — surged nearly 40 percent in April from a year ago on a combination of bad weather, high tariffs and climbing transportation costs."
AI STORIES

Genre glitches and unexpected promotional phrases as a sign of AI writing

A genre glitch is a characteristic of LLM-assisted writing where the text suddenly switches genre, typically inserting a short promotional phrase full of sensory details into an informational text. Genre glitches occur when a word in the generated text is heavily associated with a genre or context that is markedly […]

Top of a ransom note from Shinyhunters hacking group. Text reads: "SHINYHUNTERS rooting your systems since '19 ;) ShinyHunters has breached Instructure (again). Instead of contacting us to resolve it they ignored us and did some "security patches"."
Networked Politics University politics

UiB self-hosts the open source version of Canvas, so wasn’t affected by the breach

On May 1st Canvas announced a security breach, and then yesterday the system was hacked. The login page was replaced by a ransom note: if universities don’t pay up by 12 May, student data will be released. Here’s what the login page looked like yesterday: Way back in 2015, when […]

AI and algorithmic culture Networked Politics

AI-generated images, fascist aesthetics: Dieselbrølet and Heimatstrom

My German is pretty dodgy, so when I first saw Heimatstrom on Bluesky, shared by Roland Meyer, a professor of visual culture at Universität Zürich’s Digital Society Initiative, I misinterpreted it and thought it was a far-right campaign. But no, Heimatstrom is a group of left-wing environmentalists using fascist AI […]

Photo of a billboard ad at Oslo S train station showing a smiliing conductor and the text "Du må ikke sove. Joda, bare sov du."
AI STORIES

“Du må ikke sove”: a floating motif detached from its meaning (or: LLMs can write Norwegian but miss cultural references)

There’s a new ad for the train between Stavanger and Oslo in Norway that uses a line from Arnulf Øverland’s famous anti-fascist poem Du må ikke sove (“You must not sleep”). Du må ikke sove, you must not sleep, the ad says. And then it flips it, jovially, joda, bare […]

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.