Axel Bruns has written a very useful discussion of Habermas’s (lack of) development of his notion of the public sphere in response to the internet, based on a keynote adress Habermas gave that is now published.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

1 Comment

  1. David

    It is hilarious to think that you have to *update* a theory everytime a new technology comes along. Honestly, that is technological determinism at its worst. If we focus on the social (and surely that is the crux of the debate) then clearly Habermas’ critical theory – and particularly his normative counterfactual – are important means of *assessing* whether any particular technology meets the requirements of a political public sphere.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

A row of knowledge workers operate sewing machines producing piles of spreadsheets and reports.
AI and algorithmic culture AI STORIES

Språk er makt. Ikke la KI ta den makten fra deg.

Readers who don’t read Norwegian: sorry. This is in Norwegian because it is commenting on a current debate in Norwegian media. Asle Tojes debattinnlegg «får KI-alarmen til å gå,» skriver Petter Bae Brandtzæg, og jeg er enig. Toje sier riktignok nei, han har ikke brukt KI. Han «har kvitteringer,» skriver han, teksten tar […]

Five people on a stage debating
AI and algorithmic culture Algorithmic bias

Debating AI with politicians at Samfundet

I spent Wednesday evening at the famous Studentersamfundet in Trondheim, debating AI with three Norwegian members of parliament, Karianne Tung, who is Norway’s Minister for Digitization, Simen Velle, a representative for FrP, and Hege Bae Nylund, a representative for Rødt. The debate was expertly led by Liva Flo. It’s always […]