A few days ago, I received an odd email, apparently a followup to a first mail that I don’t think I ever received. I almost deleted it instantly as spam, but after a second glance I decided to try that URL. It is written by a man who is seeking his replacement. What he does, exactly, is however not made clear. Look, here’s the email:

The website is not a lot more elucidating, but the Latin title of the website, Moderari et tueri omnia (regulate and protect all) and the introductory text, it appears that the job is quite important:

While I cannot tell you the specifics of this arrangement, I can say my daily tasks are vital to everything. And by everything I mean exactly what the word implies. Without the simple and reoccurring tasks I complete, what you know now will no longer be.

The majority of the website is devoted to a lengthy questionnaire made in Google Forms. There are many questions. I believe many of those who might begin to answer would be put off by the complicated responses required:

A grocery store near your house is having a sale on breakfast cereals. The hobby store next door has run out of specialty dice, but has an overstock of scale replica airplanes. And while the parking lots trees are mature it appears the birds are avoiding them. Please explain how all these events are related.

When I shared the link on Facebook a friend pointed out I should beware lest answering the questions committed me to pushing a button every two hours like on Lost. I suspect something more closely resembling superheroes might be behind this though:

Do you have full freedom of movement or have access to devices enabling basic tasks such as pressing and pulling?
Note: you will be asked to fight in a strength enhancing suit. So answer accordingly.

However there are a few references to buttons and levers as well.

If anyone has the patience or creativity to actually answer all the questions and submit the form, I would love to hear whether you receive any response.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

2 thoughts on “Google form fiction (at least, one assumes it is fiction)

  1. Kim

    This is funny. I did answer all these questions, and I submitted them. It took me a while, ten minutes a day for a whole week, to answer the questions, but I finally did answer it. It makes me think a lot more now. I’m so curious as to what it is.

  2. Josh

    It will be tricky, I submitted a completed form, but he states he will only respond to those closest to his responses, we shall see….

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

AI STORIES

AI-generated stories have longer endings than human stories

My colleague Jessica Witte has just shared a preprint where she compared the emotional arcs of the stories we generated using gpt-4o-mini to those of human-authored (pre-2022) stories from the subreddit r/WritingPrompts, conveniently gathered in this dataset. She found a distinct difference in the endings of the LLM-generated stories: both […]

How to peer review a paper in 2026

Dorothy Bishop, a psychologist, wrote a useful list of what reviewers need to look out now that so many papers are bad science that looks good thanks to LLMs. Read her whole blog post, she explains it well, but here’s a brief version because I’m pretty sure we’ll be needing […]

“So what if it was ChatGPT? It *could* have been true!”

I recently read a good article on the different kinds of truth a language model operates with by Luke Mann, Liam Magee and Vanicka Arora, Truth Machines: Synthesizing Veracity in AI Language Models, but despite its lovely typology of truths (consensus, correspondence, coherence and pragmatic) it doesn’t help me with […]

AI STORIES

AI shimmer and sparkle

I have this hunch that sparkles and glow and shimmer are somehow a point in the latent spaces of LLMs that have more connections than you would expect. Perhaps their connotation to magic and to the unknown matches some of the mystique of genAI? Or perhaps these words are used […]

Don’t do a systematic review if you’re in the humanities

This paper is a great example of why you probably shouldn’t use a systematic literature review for a theoretical and conceptual research question like “How does artificial intelligence affect the perception of authenticity and aura in art?” However, if you’re looking for an annotated list of 48 recent articles about […]