The New Hampshire primaries were held today, and of course, who would make the best president is a frequent topic of discussion here in Chicago. I like both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. Probably just as well I don’t have the vote because I’d find it hard to choose.

We watched the debates on Saturday and I was surprised to find that when Clinton got just a bit annoyed, everyone took that as a Really Bad Mistake. But she remained well-spoken, polite and articulate – I really liked her controlled anger. On the other hand, people loved it when she responded all coyly and fake-charmingly to the obnoxious question about what she thought of the objection voters apparently make that she’s not “as likeable” as Obama. “That hurts my feelings,” she said, sweetly cocking her head just a little, flirtatiously playing to the stereotypes of femininity as little girls are taught to do. What a fine moment, the commentators said.

And so although I’m possibly an Obama supporter I found myself pleased that Clinton won in New Hampshire.

Gloria Steinem writes in the New York Times today that gender is still a more discriminatory force in politics than race is: “So why is the sex barrier not taken as seriously as the racial one? The reasons are as pervasive as the air we breathe: because sexism is still confused with nature as racism once was.” She continues:

[W]hat worries me is that he is seen as unifying by his race while she is seen as divisive by her sex.

What worries me is that she is accused of ìplaying the gender cardî when citing the old boysí club, while he is seen as unifying by citing civil rights confrontations.

What worries me is that male Iowa voters were seen as gender-free when supporting their own, while female voters were seen as biased if they did and disloyal if they didnít.

Yes, the argument that it’s time to get rid of the dynasties of US politics is a good one (Bush senior, Bush junior; Clinton the husband, Clinton the wife: it’s more than ridiculous) but the power of finally having a woman president, a role model as powerful as that for the rest of us – that would be an amazing thing for the United States and for the world.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

7 thoughts on “gloria steinem: sexism in politics is stronger than racism

  1. Gro

    Yes, interesting election. From Norwegian
    newspapers I get the impression that many people vote for Obama out of tactical reasons.
    The argument seems to be that there are less fuzz around obama than
    hillary, so if he wins, the democrates are more likely to win. Sad
    if her sex is an argument for this tactical thinking.

  2. Mum

    It seems incredible that in more than 200 years of democratic elections in the United States, only one woman, only now, has ever had even a spitting chance of making it to the top job in the oval office. American voters time after time have chosen their leaders from only 50% of the population? Time for a change. Go Hillary! There’ll be plenty of Obamas down the line.

  3. Chuck

    The treatment of Hillary Clinton has been driving me insane. Although I’m more inclined to support Obama, I was also glad to see Clinton win New Hampshire.

    Coincidentally Colbert is playing right now and just showed a montage of like eight (male) pundits all saying that Hillary’s tears “humanized” her. The US media coverage of this election has been irresponsible at best.

  4. Jeff

    A fascinating election in the U.S. Gender seems to be less than a factor in other countries. In Argentina’s recent presidential elections, the top 2 candidates receiving the most votes were both women, and Argentina is still a very sexist country in comparison to the U.S.

  5. Gro

    In Norway we have a lot of female politicians, and no one interpretates that as a
    sign of decline in society/culture values. That a woman i U.S
    still has to fight to be reconized as a person, with personality
    is beyond my understanding.

  6. Mel

    Why am surprised that this presidential campaign underscores that
    sexism is stronger than racism? The response to the constituent who
    asked, “How do we beat the bitch?” to John McCain in So Carolina
    was gales of laughter. A male supporter added he thought they
    were talking about his ex-wife. More laughter. Keep your day job,
    buddy; there’s no room for you in stand-up comedy! McCain responded after laughing, that
    it was a good question. Let me ask this: What if the supporter asked,
    “How to we beat the [n-word]?

    Remember African American men were given the right vote by the 15th Amendment
    in 1870. It was not until 50 years later that the 19th Amendment gave
    all women the right to vote.

    Racism/Sexism/Ageism should never be tolerated!!!

  7. Ron

    African American men were only given the right to vote on paper. If they dared tried to use that “right” they were beaten or worse. The 19th Amendment practically only gave white women the right to vote. It was only in 1965 that African Americans (both men and women) had that chance.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Don’t do a systematic review if you’re in the humanities

This paper is a great example of why you probably shouldn’t use a systematic literature review for a theoretical and conceptual research question like “How does artificial intelligence affect the perception of authenticity and aura in art?” However, if you’re looking for an annotated list of 48 recent articles about […]

Screenshot of a paragraph from a New York Times article published May 12, 2026. Text reads: "The price of tomatoes -tart bursts of flavor in salads and sandwiches — surged nearly 40 percent in April from a year ago on a combination of bad weather, high tariffs and climbing transportation costs."
AI STORIES

Genre glitches and unexpected promotional phrases as a sign of AI writing

A genre glitch is a characteristic of LLM-assisted writing where the text suddenly switches genre, typically inserting a short promotional phrase full of sensory details into an informational text. Genre glitches occur when a word in the generated text is heavily associated with a genre or context that is markedly […]

Top of a ransom note from Shinyhunters hacking group. Text reads: "SHINYHUNTERS rooting your systems since '19 ;) ShinyHunters has breached Instructure (again). Instead of contacting us to resolve it they ignored us and did some "security patches"."
Networked Politics University politics

UiB self-hosts the open source version of Canvas, so wasn’t affected by the breach

On May 1st Canvas announced a security breach, and then yesterday the system was hacked. The login page was replaced by a ransom note: if universities don’t pay up by 12 May, student data will be released. Here’s what the login page looked like yesterday: Way back in 2015, when […]

AI and algorithmic culture Networked Politics

AI-generated images, fascist aesthetics: Dieselbrølet and Heimatstrom

My German is pretty dodgy, so when I first saw Heimatstrom on Bluesky, shared by Roland Meyer, a professor of visual culture at Universität Zürich’s Digital Society Initiative, I misinterpreted it and thought it was a far-right campaign. But no, Heimatstrom is a group of left-wing environmentalists using fascist AI […]

Photo of a billboard ad at Oslo S train station showing a smiliing conductor and the text "Du må ikke sove. Joda, bare sov du."
AI STORIES

“Du må ikke sove”: a floating motif detached from its meaning (or: LLMs can write Norwegian but miss cultural references)

There’s a new ad for the train between Stavanger and Oslo in Norway that uses a line from Arnulf Øverland’s famous anti-fascist poem Du må ikke sove (“You must not sleep”). Du må ikke sove, you must not sleep, the ad says. And then it flips it, jovially, joda, bare […]

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]