With national elections coming up next month here in Norway, I’m interested in how politicians are using social media. There’s certainly a lot of activity on Facebook, and KrF’s Knut Arild Hareide is one of the people said to be using Facebook most successfully, daring to be quite personal. This promotional video came out this morning. It starts off with Hareide posting a selfie with the text “I’m in good shape for the elections!” and then running off, music in his earbuds. A supporter runs after him, trying to tell him all the things he agree with him on and to ask some questions, but Hareide runs on, completely oblivious. The final slogan is “Follow me on Facebook instead.”

On the one hand, Hareide really does seem to be very present on Facebook. On the other hand, doesn’t the video seems to say that he ignores voters and supporters in real life? What do you think?

Gunn Enli leads a project at the University of Oslo comparing use of social media in elections, collaborating with, among others, Axel Bruns, who does the same thing in Australia. In an interview with Forskning.no last week Gunn said that one of the main differences between Norwegian and US politicians’ use of social media is that Norwegian politicians invite and participate in debate and dialogue to a far greater extent than the Americans do. Party this is because Norwegian elections don’t depend on donations, so Norwegian politicians don’t have to use social media to solicit donations from their supporters.

Erna Solberg, the leader of Høyre and, if the current opposition wins, our next Prime Minister, admitted defeat this morning, though, and wrote that she has blocked private messages on Facebook, and may not answer all questions to her wall either.

Erna Solberg begs for our understanding: she really appreciates our messages but can't answer them before the election.
Erna Solberg begs for our understanding: she really appreciates our messages but can’t answer them before the election. Posted to her Facebook page on August 5, 2013 at around 9 am.

Solberg (or an assistant?) does answer many of the questions posted to her wall, though, and in the last few days she has answered far more questions than Hareide has.

Questions on Erna Solberg's Facebook wall. The snapshot was taken on August 5, 12pm.
Questions on Erna Solberg’s Facebook wall. The snapshot was taken on August 5, 12pm.

Direct democracy and direct communication with voters takes a lot of time – and yet is increasingly important.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.