When I played violin, we used to laugh at the fingernail girls. They had long nails on every finger that needn’t touch fingerpad to wood: the left thumb, the right index, middle and ring fingers. Their other nails were neatly trimmed, for these girls were often diligent violinists and acutely aware of the need to adjust the body to the instrument. The callouses under their chins were as red as ours but still we laughed, and cut all our nails to the quick.

It’s been years since I’ve trimmed my nails to interface with technology, but just a minute’s texting on my new Z600 has me cutting my modest thumb nails. The lumpy, rubber keys on my old phone were far more forgiving than the sleek flatness of the Z600. It looks better, though, and does more. And I like short, practical nails.

I wonder whether bodies are marked by our computers as they are by instruments. My fingertips are no longer leathery, my throat has lost the aching red mark worn by the violin pushed so often against it in the past, but the memories are there, and I pick my violin up as naturally as I ride a bike or touchtype. And I trim my thumbnails.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

6 thoughts on “fingernails and technology

  1. diane

    oh yes, we’re marked. let me tell you about my sciatica…

  2. Katja

    Nerves, skin, nails. And muscles. These days I find it odd and strenuous to stretch my fingers away from each other, to spread them out with strength. The way it was usual when we played handball in school. You had to be able to take a strong hold of the ball with the fingers pulled as far away from each other as possible. Not the same typing on soft keys. And it was different yet on typewriters. In my day we still learned 10-finger typing on a mechanical–not electric–typewriter. I clearly remember the crampy feeling in my ring and little fingers. I’m sure all the muscles I trained back then are long gone.

  3. Francois Lachance

    I recently clipped an article from a weekly magazine that had a headline reading “Mind your motion”. The piece suggests the intelligent use of muslces as a mental booster. It suggests introducing unusual movements into one’s day. And to quote directly “These insights come form the sudy of childhood development and the way physcality opens up new pathways in the human brain.” The question to perhaps ask of computer use is what lies nearby that can move the body for example to look out a window, to stretch a hand to netsuke, to cock an ear to ambiant noise. If the evidence from photos of people captured at their workstations is an indications the environments that suround online enthusiasts tend to be be rich in details. And it is not just the photos. It is also some of the graphic work used to skin weblogs. For example Elouise Oyzon’s close-ups of closed eyes to accompany the main or home page of her weblog and her smile closeup for the comments. A rather interesting mapping occurs on the body of the reader.
    On Jason Rhody’s Miscellany is the Largest category an anthropomorphic robot has readers paying attention to big head and big feet, if the reader/viewer is prone to mimetic moments. Liz Lawley’s Mamamusings neatly layers attention. A small window-like frame in the upper left positions the viewer/reader in a cafe like atmosphere, the blog entries themselve offer another layer like a wall and behind both the expansive peach-coloured rose that really only connects with the viewer with scrolling. And then there is the switches that jill/txt has undergone. There is Alex Halavais’s layout that has comments to the right of the entry to which they relate, both on the same page, and thereby offers great swathes of negative space and invites hand-eye motor coordination via up and down scrollings.

    BTW in the fiction of Samuel Delany nail biters are eroticised.

  4. Dennis G. Jerz

    When I first started journaling, at about age 14, I soon got a big red lump on my right middle finger, right where the pen rested on it. Now that I have a PDA with voice memo, and (last month or so) a PDA keyboard, I hardly write anything longhand, other than personal notes (which I type out first, edit online, and then transfer to paper).

    That red lump on my middle finger never completely goes away.

    Of course, repetitive strain injury is affecting my body, too.

  5. bicyclemark

    Reminds me of old times with my coke-nail. .. what? I kid.. I kid.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.