One of the things I really want to do with this blog is write about networked and digital art and literature. I do far too little of that. I don’t attend the really interesting things that happen in Bergen because I’m tired or can’t find a babysitter or because I’m away, and I don’t take the time to experience art and literature on the web that I want to because, well, I don’t know why. Other things are more pressing. It sucks.

I’m not a specialist in electronic music, but I still wanted to write about the installation in the greenhouse in MusÈhagen last week: Farteins hage, Fartein’s Garden, which is part of a larger Fartein Valen project at the Bergen Festival this year. I walk past their every week, and since I discovered a few years ago that the greenhouse is actually open to the public (and always entirely empty of people) I’ve taken to walking through it every now and then. The warmth is magical in the cold Bergen winter, and there are plants there that I remember from my grandfather’s garden in Perth and from the gardens where my sister used to live in Malaysia. Yet I found every possible excuse not to visit the sound installation in the greenhouse. My camera battery was flat and I wanted to wait until I could take a photo, maybe some video. I would hurry to work now, get stuff done and visit the exhibition on the way home. Only by then I had left work too late and only barely had time to get to my daughter’s school before closing time, let alone visit a sound installation. Repeat. It is astounding how easy it is to prioritise stress ahead of space, time, meaning, writing, thinking.

Fartein Valen is one of Norway’s great composers. I knew far too little about him, though his name is so strange it’s completely familiar. I hadn’t realised that he also loved the greenhouse in MusÈhagen. He spent a few childhood years in Madagaskar, and so, I assume, missed the warmth as I miss the open spaces of Australia. He’s remembered for having brought contemporary music to Norway, and is particularly noted for his atonal, polyphonic compositions.

The installation in the greenhouse is by Nils Henrik Asheim, one of our contemporary composors who was born a few years after Valen died. You can play the video to get an inkling of the music, but the sound quality is terrible and sadly my battery died before the most interesting part of the soundscape began. In addition to the haunting sounds you can hear in the video, Asheim has mixed recordings of Valen’s voice with the soft voice of a Madagaskan woman. I’ve lost the sheet of paper explaining it, but I think the poster said that the woman’s voice resembled that of his Madagaskan nurse. The voices mixed together sounded like a song, neither male nor female, and speaking no language or all languages. The speakers were placed on the windows of the old greenhouse (small white plastic crosses that spread vibrations through the glass) so it was almost as though the greenhouse itself was speaking.

Before I entered the greenhouse I heard nothing but the sound of the Student Centre being demolished nearby, but after I left I could hear the quiet voices speaking from the empty glass house. I didn’t quite understand it, but I liked its mystery and the idea of memories, the very idea of tropical plants and humidity in a tiny glass building in Bergen.

They’re taking the installation down after tomorrow. I should have written about it before.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

2 thoughts on “fartein’s garden

  1. Raymond M. Kristiansen

    Wow, I must go see that installation, and I will take some footage of it as well. The footage will go up on my videoblog (http://dltq.blogs.com).

    Thanks for pointing me to this – I have been in a very different world from the Bergen Festival…

  2. Jill

    Hey, great! Looking forward to seeing it!

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Screenshot of a paragraph from a New York Times article published May 12, 2026. Text reads: "The price of tomatoes -tart bursts of flavor in salads and sandwiches — surged nearly 40 percent in April from a year ago on a combination of bad weather, high tariffs and climbing transportation costs."
AI STORIES

Genre glitches and unexpected promotional phrases as a sign of AI writing

A genre glitch is a characteristic of LLM-assisted writing where the text suddenly switches genre, typically inserting a short promotional phrase full of sensory details into an informational text. Genre glitches occur when a word in the generated text is heavily associated with a genre or context that is markedly […]

Top of a ransom note from Shinyhunters hacking group. Text reads: "SHINYHUNTERS rooting your systems since '19 ;) ShinyHunters has breached Instructure (again). Instead of contacting us to resolve it they ignored us and did some "security patches"."
Networked Politics University politics

UiB self-hosts the open source version of Canvas, so wasn’t affected by the breach

On May 1st Canvas announced a security breach, and then yesterday the system was hacked. The login page was replaced by a ransom note: if universities don’t pay up by 12 May, student data will be released. Here’s what the login page looked like yesterday: Way back in 2015, when […]

AI and algorithmic culture Networked Politics

AI-generated images, fascist aesthetics: Dieselbrølet and Heimatstrom

My German is pretty dodgy, so when I first saw Heimatstrom on Bluesky, shared by Roland Meyer, a professor of visual culture at Universität Zürich’s Digital Society Initiative, I misinterpreted it and thought it was a far-right campaign. But no, Heimatstrom is a group of left-wing environmentalists using fascist AI […]

Photo of a billboard ad at Oslo S train station showing a smiliing conductor and the text "Du må ikke sove. Joda, bare sov du."
AI STORIES

“Du må ikke sove”: a floating motif detached from its meaning (or: LLMs can write Norwegian but miss cultural references)

There’s a new ad for the train between Stavanger and Oslo in Norway that uses a line from Arnulf Øverland’s famous anti-fascist poem Du må ikke sove (“You must not sleep”). Du må ikke sove, you must not sleep, the ad says. And then it flips it, jovially, joda, bare […]

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.