Screenshot from Richard Powers: 'They Come in a Steady Stream Now' - first

Richard Powers (one of whose novels I’ve been meaning to read) published a short email narrative, “They Come in a Steady Stream Now” in the latest edition of Ninth Letter, a journal out of the University of Illinois. Though it’s not really a narrative – it’s a short (as in five minutes to read it) essay on the annoyance of spam, with a couple of narrative fragments within it, about spams sent from random email addresses that happen to bear the name of your first love, or a boy you knew who drowned when you were in high school. You read the piece in a Flash-created simulation of an email client, as in Jerry Pinto’s Inbox Outbox. A few seconds after you start reading an email, a new email pops up in the inbox. Some of the emails are from “Richard Powers”, but more are spam, which you still have to click on and read because the work is entirely linear. Even the hordes of pop up ads (for the journal itself, annoyingly) relentlessly require you to click the X to shut them in an exact order or they will not close.

Screenshot from Richard Powers's 'They Come in a Steady Stream Now'

Finally, before the promised seventh and last email, you’re asked to register by giving your email address. I typed in a throwaway mailinator.com address, was told the page was loading, but it never finished loading, nor did any mail ever appear. I don’t know whether this was a bug or simply a clever simulation of the closest we ever get to closure in today’s bug-ridden information ecology.

I found “They Come in a Steady Stream Now” through Eric Rasmussen’s weblog, and I must say, I share his disappointment. The writing’s quite good, but not extraordinary, and the gimmick’s not much more than a gimmick. The idea of spam apparently from people once close but now lost to you is appealing, but isn’t taken very far (unless I really missed most of the piece and the registration thing wasn’t actually the end) and while the graphic design is groovy, the exaggerated advertising gets old and the linearity is unsophisticated.

Emails are certainly being explored as fields of narrative potential these days. That’s cool.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

5 thoughts on “email story by Richard Powers”

  1. Anthony

    One of his early works, “The Gold Bug Variations,” is extraordinary. “Operation Wandering Soul” and “Galatea 2.2” also excellent.

  2. Bengt

    You have been noticed by Enblogomdan
    http://enblogomdan.blogspot.com

    It would be great if there were more connections between norwegian and swedish bloggers.

  3. Marisa

    I thought you would like this. It is distrubuted fiction on people.
    http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/12/magazine/12SKIN.html

  4. Jill

    Oh, cool, nice to see Skin getting more press! I already know this one – did you know Shelly Jackson also wrote one of the most renowned hypertext fictions ever, Patchwork Girl, from 1993?

    Thanks for the tip!

  5. nick

    I tried trackbacking to no avail. Anyway, thanks for the pointer and the writing about this. I posted a walkthrough at Grand Text Auto.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

screenshot of blogpost from sept 11, 2001, about blogger.com showing blog posts about the attacks
Networked Politics social media

25 years since September 11

I’ve been reading through my blog posts on September 11, 2001 and the days that followed. The things that stand out to me – in addition to the horror of the attack itself – are how massively we (or at least I) used the web to understand what was happening, […]

AI STORIES

AI-generated stories have longer endings than human stories

My colleague Jessica Witte has just shared a preprint where she compared the emotional arcs of the stories we generated using gpt-4o-mini to those of human-authored (pre-2022) stories from the subreddit r/WritingPrompts, conveniently gathered in this dataset. She found a distinct difference in the endings of the LLM-generated stories: both […]

How to peer review a paper in 2026

Dorothy Bishop, a psychologist, wrote a useful list of what reviewers need to look out now that so many papers are bad science that looks good thanks to LLMs. Read her whole blog post, she explains it well, but here’s a brief version because I’m pretty sure we’ll be needing […]

“So what if it was ChatGPT? It *could* have been true!”

I recently read a good article on the different kinds of truth a language model operates with by Luke Mann, Liam Magee and Vanicka Arora, Truth Machines: Synthesizing Veracity in AI Language Models, but despite its lovely typology of truths (consensus, correspondence, coherence and pragmatic) it doesn’t help me with […]

AI STORIES

AI shimmer and sparkle

I have this hunch that sparkles and glow and shimmer are somehow a point in the latent spaces of LLMs that have more connections than you would expect. Perhaps their connotation to magic and to the unknown matches some of the mystique of genAI? Or perhaps these words are used […]