“Well,” he said, “a disadvantage of using it is that since each blog post is simply a text file on your server, the last time the file was modified becomes the time stamp on the blog post. So I can’t edit posts after posting them: if I did, the system would decide the post was fresh and put it at the top of the page with today’s date on it.”

“Oh, that would never work for me,” I replied, “I edit my posts continuously. All my posts would have today’s date if my software kept track of my edits like that.”

The subject changed with no further comment than a couple of raised eyebrows from the other bloggers present, but I relished my words as though speaking sacrilege, imagining what such a blog would be like: continuously edited just as memories are.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

2 thoughts on “edit continuously”

  1. patricia

    I’m glad to learn I’m not the only one to do this. I’ve only just recently caught up on how strongly some people in the blogosphere feel about editing posts after they’ve been published, and I must say, I don’t get it.

    Of course I would love for every entry to be ‘perfect’ when I first hit that save button, but there are times when I check my page and I’m horrified to see a typo or a horribly constructed sentence. After I get over the mortification of knowing people have witnessed the horror, I log in and make the necessary changes. By some people’s standards, I should just let the errors go, but I can’t, and seeing as how it’s my blog after all, I happily don’t have to.

  2. mark

    I think it’s the idea of being revisionist, as in, by editing ‘blog postings you’re pretending you always said something different. Not sure I agree with it (especially if your changes are just minor: re-writing a sentence here, fixing a typo there), but the idea of pushing something upon the world and proudly saying “here is what I said/thought/wrote at 00:05 on 20030908, whatever my opinion is now or was beforehand!” has its appeal, especially to those who feel their ‘blogs are how they present themselves. As in, not “this is how I am” but “this is how I was, and that is how I am, and over there you’ll find how I’d like to be…”

    Sort of thing.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

screenshot of blogpost from sept 11, 2001, about blogger.com showing blog posts about the attacks
Networked Politics social media

25 years since September 11

I’ve been reading through my blog posts on September 11, 2001 and the days that followed. The things that stand out to me – in addition to the horror of the attack itself – are how massively we (or at least I) used the web to understand what was happening, […]

AI STORIES

AI-generated stories have longer endings than human stories

My colleague Jessica Witte has just shared a preprint where she compared the emotional arcs of the stories we generated using gpt-4o-mini to those of human-authored (pre-2022) stories from the subreddit r/WritingPrompts, conveniently gathered in this dataset. She found a distinct difference in the endings of the LLM-generated stories: both […]

How to peer review a paper in 2026

Dorothy Bishop, a psychologist, wrote a useful list of what reviewers need to look out now that so many papers are bad science that looks good thanks to LLMs. Read her whole blog post, she explains it well, but here’s a brief version because I’m pretty sure we’ll be needing […]

“So what if it was ChatGPT? It *could* have been true!”

I recently read a good article on the different kinds of truth a language model operates with by Luke Mann, Liam Magee and Vanicka Arora, Truth Machines: Synthesizing Veracity in AI Language Models, but despite its lovely typology of truths (consensus, correspondence, coherence and pragmatic) it doesn’t help me with […]

AI STORIES

AI shimmer and sparkle

I have this hunch that sparkles and glow and shimmer are somehow a point in the latent spaces of LLMs that have more connections than you would expect. Perhaps their connotation to magic and to the unknown matches some of the mystique of genAI? Or perhaps these words are used […]