I just signed up for my first ever e-course: NOW YOU on self-portraiture. I’ll receive email assignments three times a week for six weeks, and there’ll be discussions and a private Flickr group to share results with the other participants.

I’ve seen a lot of these e-courses advertised over the last couple of years, and particularly in the craft blog sphere. They seem fairly expensive (this one is $75) but as such they’re also an interesting example of a new kind of cottage industry, where women (usually women as far as I have seen) sell their services to other women. Looking at a list on Studio Mothers, the quality seems varying – often these e-courses seem simply to be ways of packaging a series of blog posts in a way where you can sell them. I suppose that’s fine. Most of the courses do promise more than “daily inspirational emails from me”, and there’s usually a strong emphasis on community, on finding oneself, on finding ways to be happy within everyday constraints and without grand outward changes – the material for this course mentions finding beauty in our changing bodies, and repeatedly uses the phrase “everyday beauty”.

Many blogs share this urge towards self-improvement. In her book on blogging, Viviane Serfaty argued that blogs follow the Puritan tradition of the diary as a form of spiritual work, meant to be shared with others and seen as a constant tool for self-improvement. Blogging itself is also seen as a tool for achieving happiness: I have a book on my desk titled Blogging for Bliss: Crafting Your Own Online Journal, and there are, of course, e-courses helping you to become a better blogger.

In presentations about blogs, I often use this image (the view from my window in particularly dramatic lighting) to illustrate bloggers' urge for self-improvement - or at least self-understanding.

As a researcher I’m very interested in the many ways we represent ourselves online. In blogs, obviously, but also in self-portraits and through the automated templates social media provide us (free preprint here). So learning more about both self-portraits in general and about how people think about self-portraits intrigues me.

As a human being I like the idea of working to improve at seeing myself – like many of us, I tend to dislike photos of me, and while I’ve tried taking self-portraits I’ve not had a lot of luck. Challenging myself to experiment with this for six weeks sounds like it would be both fun and satisfying. I’ll let you know how it goes.

And while I’m curious about this as a researcher, I’ll be attending the course as a human being, not in order to do research on it.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Machine Vision

Cultural Representations of Machine Vision: An Experimental Mixed Methods Workshop

Call for submissions to a workshop, Bergen, Norway
Workshop dates: 15-17 August 2022
Proposals due: 15 June

The Machine Vision in Everyday Life project invites proposals for an interdisciplinary workshop using qualitative approaches and digital methods to analyse how machine vision is represented in art, science fiction, games, social media and other forms of cultural and aesthetic expression.

Digital Humanities Machine Vision

What do different machine vision technologies do in fiction and art?

For the Machine Vision in Everyday Life project we’ve analysed how machine vision technologies are portrayed and used in 500 works of fiction and art, including 77 digital games, 190 digital artworks and 233 movies, novels and other narratives. You can browse […]

AI and algorithmic culture Presentations

My talk on caring AIs in recent sci-fi novels

I’m giving a talk at an actual f2f academic conference today, Critical Borders, Radical Re(visions) of AI, in Cambridge. I was particularly excited to see this conference because it’s organised by the people who edited AI Narratives A History of Imaginative Thinking […]