Ever since I came across the Digital Methods Initiative website I’ve wanted to attend one of their summer schools in Amsterdam, where they hack out new tools to do digitally native research on digitally native materials. They have an impressive range of tools with a lot of documentation, but I still wanted more. But two weeks in Amsterdam sadly doesn’t mesh too well with not wanting to leave the kids for that long, so I was thrilled when Yra van Dijk introduced me to Richard Rogers in Amsterdam last December, and even more thrilled with Richard and his colleague and wife Sabine Niederer agreed to come to Bergen and host a miniature workshop for us here.

Richard gave an excellent talk on what Digital Methods is to start with, then we discussed projects we were working on and, after lunch, talked about ways we might go about using digital methods in our projects and had a hands-on go at their Google Scraper tool (Lippmannian machine). Basically all the machine does is query Google for incidents of one or several key words on one or several sites – but by being able to do this across many sites at a time you save a lot of time. I had some fun comparing counts of the terms “electronic literature” and “digital literature” on a few e-lit sites. Lots of ideas and inspiration – if you haven’t yet explored their site and tried out some of the tools they’ve developed I would highly recommend it.

Richard’s book on Digital Methods is forthcoming on MIT Press next February. I’ve read a chapter and it’s good! You can find a lot of material about digital methods on the website right now, too, of course.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

1 Comment

  1. […] Rogers and Sabine Niederer came up from Amsterdam to run a mini-workshop for us here in Bergen last June, which gave us an excellent sampling of how they work. Since then, we’ve been slowly been […]

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

screenshot of blogpost from sept 11, 2001, about blogger.com showing blog posts about the attacks
Networked Politics social media

25 years since September 11

I’ve been reading through my blog posts on September 11, 2001 and the days that followed. The things that stand out to me – in addition to the horror of the attack itself – are how massively we (or at least I) used the web to understand what was happening, […]

AI STORIES

AI-generated stories have longer endings than human stories

My colleague Jessica Witte has just shared a preprint where she compared the emotional arcs of the stories we generated using gpt-4o-mini to those of human-authored (pre-2022) stories from the subreddit r/WritingPrompts, conveniently gathered in this dataset. She found a distinct difference in the endings of the LLM-generated stories: both […]

How to peer review a paper in 2026

Dorothy Bishop, a psychologist, wrote a useful list of what reviewers need to look out now that so many papers are bad science that looks good thanks to LLMs. Read her whole blog post, she explains it well, but here’s a brief version because I’m pretty sure we’ll be needing […]

“So what if it was ChatGPT? It *could* have been true!”

I recently read a good article on the different kinds of truth a language model operates with by Luke Mann, Liam Magee and Vanicka Arora, Truth Machines: Synthesizing Veracity in AI Language Models, but despite its lovely typology of truths (consensus, correspondence, coherence and pragmatic) it doesn’t help me with […]

AI STORIES

AI shimmer and sparkle

I have this hunch that sparkles and glow and shimmer are somehow a point in the latent spaces of LLMs that have more connections than you would expect. Perhaps their connotation to magic and to the unknown matches some of the mystique of genAI? Or perhaps these words are used […]