The next Digital Arts and Culture conference is going to be in Copenhagen, December 1-3, and the call for papers is just out! Full papers to be submitted by August 1.

My advisor, Espen Aarseth, started the Digital Arts and Culture series with a generous four-year grant from the Norwegian Research Council. I was the local coordinator for the first DAC, back in 1998, in charge of emails and the website and practical details. I had lots of help from Torill and others in the final weeks – I was finishing my MA at the same time and it was really exhausting! Look, the conference website is still there, papers and all! The year after, Terry Harpold chaired the second iteration at Georgia Tech in Atlanta, and it was excellent: twice as big as the year before and webcast and full of art installations and far more food than anyone could eat. (I met my not-yet-then-boyfriend for the first time; he was sitting in the sun with a group of young men and they fascinated me though I didn’t speak with them much. Later I insisted they come to the hotelroom party and he and I flirted but that was all.) I haven’t checked whether the webcasts still work – perhaps you can still watch quarrels about narrative and cybertext and fiction? The year after that, the conference returned to Bergen, chaired by Jan Rune Holmevik, and new people turned up, lots of people I still know and love to meet at conferences. The DAC 2000 website (designed by Elin) is still there too. 2001 was the final year of Norwegian Research Council funding, and the conference was held at Brown, where Espen was a visiting scholar. I arrived late for this conference, having – uh – well, actually I turned up at the airport with my daughter’s passport and understandably wasn’t let on the plane. Interestingly it only cost $50 to change my non-refundable dirt-cheap ticket to one leaving the next day, so I turned up a day late and the conference was already in motion and I never quite caught up. (I barely spoke with my not-yet-boyfriend but there was a smile as we rushed past each other; his hands were full of ELO t-shirts and he gave me one. I was surprised, and pleased.) There was a gap after that, until RMIT in Melbourne sponsored DAC 2003, which featured kangaroos and bite-sized lamingtons in addition to excellent shopping and a lot of very good papers.

I’m so pleased that the IT University in Copenhagen is keeping DAC alive with DAC 2005. Obviously I’m partial, having been involved in this baby’s conception, but the Digital Arts and Culture conferences have been my home ground, the place I meet people doing things like me and things I’d never have though of but intensely related to what I might want to do. They’ve combined art and literature and theory, and they’ve usually been small enough to be social, though I guess I got a pretty serious head start in the socialising. I hope I’ll see you there!


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

2 thoughts on “DAC 2005 in Copenhagen!

  1. All things Bru

    Digital Arts and Culture 2005 in Coopenaghen

    The next Digital Arts and Culture conference is going to be in Copenhagen, December 1-3, and the call for papers is just out! Full papers to be submitted by August 1. Via Jill…

  2. […] The Digital Arts and Culture conferences are another kind of home to me. […]

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

AI STORIES

AI-generated stories have longer endings than human stories

My colleague Jessica Witte has just shared a preprint where she compared the emotional arcs of the stories we generated using gpt-4o-mini to those of human-authored (pre-2022) stories from the subreddit r/WritingPrompts, conveniently gathered in this dataset. She found a distinct difference in the endings of the LLM-generated stories: both […]

How to peer review a paper in 2026

Dorothy Bishop, a psychologist, wrote a useful list of what reviewers need to look out now that so many papers are bad science that looks good thanks to LLMs. Read her whole blog post, she explains it well, but here’s a brief version because I’m pretty sure we’ll be needing […]

“So what if it was ChatGPT? It *could* have been true!”

I recently read a good article on the different kinds of truth a language model operates with by Luke Mann, Liam Magee and Vanicka Arora, Truth Machines: Synthesizing Veracity in AI Language Models, but despite its lovely typology of truths (consensus, correspondence, coherence and pragmatic) it doesn’t help me with […]

AI STORIES

AI shimmer and sparkle

I have this hunch that sparkles and glow and shimmer are somehow a point in the latent spaces of LLMs that have more connections than you would expect. Perhaps their connotation to magic and to the unknown matches some of the mystique of genAI? Or perhaps these words are used […]

Don’t do a systematic review if you’re in the humanities

This paper is a great example of why you probably shouldn’t use a systematic literature review for a theoretical and conceptual research question like “How does artificial intelligence affect the perception of authenticity and aura in art?” However, if you’re looking for an annotated list of 48 recent articles about […]