Call for submissions
Workshop dates: 15-17 August 2022

Location: Bergen, Norway
Proposals due: 15 June

The ERC project Machine Vision in Everyday Life invites submissions to a workshop to be held at Solstrand Hotel near Bergen, Norway, on 15-17 August 2022. In this interdisciplinary workshop we will combine qualitative approaches and digital methods to analyse how machine vision is represented in art, science fiction, games, social media and other forms of cultural and aesthetic expression.

The workshop combines qualitative close readings and case studies of machine vision in art, fiction, games and social media, and collaboration on analysing the project’s dataset on machine vision in 500 creative works. The workshop is for scholars at all levels from graduate students to full professors and will result in a special journal issue on the topic. The project will cover the cost of hotel and board for the workshop, and a limited number of travel stipends may be available. 

Topic

As visual technologies are increasingly combined with machine learning to interpret and generate images, societies around the globe face practical and ethical questions about how these new possibilities should be evaluated, implemented and governed as they impact people’s everyday life. With their anticipatory and speculative potential, cultural representations of machine vision play a key role in answering these questions.

Our premise is that cultural production – including literature, art, cinema, video games, science fiction, memes, fandom and more – is a rich source for understanding the impact of machine vision technologies on society, as well as their potential future trajectory. What can we learn from how machine vision is represented, applied and discussed in digital art, video games, novels, movies, TV-series, fan fiction, electronic literature, popular culture, social media content and other aesthetically or culturally expressive genres?

Qualitative interpretation and/or data analysis

Seeking to experiment with mixed methods approaches, this workshop will ask participants to explore both qualitative interpretations and quantitative analyses of machine vision in art, games, narratives and more, based on the dataset Representations of Machine Vision Technologies in Artworks, Games and Narratives, which documents how machine vision is portrayed in 500 cultural works. The dataset is available as a set of .csv files, is described in a recently published data article, and can be also browsed using a more human-friendly interface at http://machine-vision.no

Participants are invited to either present work-in-progress towards individually or co-authored papers on the topic of machine vision and its cultural representation, or to pitch and discuss strategies for analysing the dataset in collaboration with other workshop participants. In either case, workshop hours will be divided between short presentations, feedback sessions, and individual or collaborative data analysis and/or writing. The workshop has two goals: generating new research from the project’s dataset, and experiment with a mixed method approach to digital humanities data. A goal of the workshop is to develop research that combines qualitative methods with data science and data analysis, and to strengthen interactions between researchers using different methods. 

The workshop will be held at Solstrand Hotel, with delicious meals, beautiful fjord views, plenty of nooks and crannies for writing and group work, and indoor and outdoor bathing opportunities.

Participants will be invited to submit papers developed in the workshop to a special journal issue that is currently under development.

How to apply

Please send an email to jill.walker.rettberg@uib.no by June 15, 2022 with a few sentences about your background and either a 250-word abstract for the paper you would like to develop at the workshop, or an idea for how you’d like to work with the dataset and a short explanation of why you’re interested in participating in the workshop. We are also open to participants who would like to analyse other relevant datasets or materials, or who have general skills in data science and would like experience applying humanities approaches to digital methods. Travel scholarships may be available for a limited number of applicants.

Funding: The workshop is funded by the University of Bergen and the project Machine Vision in Everyday Life: Playful Interactions with Visual Technologies in Digital Art, Games, Narratives and Social Media, which has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement No 771800).


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Top of a ransom note from Shinyhunters hacking group. Text reads: "SHINYHUNTERS rooting your systems since '19 ;) ShinyHunters has breached Instructure (again). Instead of contacting us to resolve it they ignored us and did some "security patches"."
Networked Politics University politics

UiB self-hosts the open source version of Canvas, so wasn’t affected by the breach

On May 1st Canvas announced a security breach, and then yesterday the system was hacked. The login page was replaced by a ransom note: if universities don’t pay up by 12 May, student data will be released. Here’s what the login page looked like yesterday: Way back in 2015, when […]

AI and algorithmic culture Networked Politics

AI-generated images, fascist aesthetics: Dieselbrølet and Heimatstrom

My German is pretty dodgy, so when I first saw Heimatstrom on Bluesky, shared by Roland Meyer, a professor of visual culture at Universität Zürich’s Digital Society Initiative, I misinterpreted it and thought it was a far-right campaign. But no, Heimatstrom is a group of left-wing environmentalists using fascist AI […]

Photo of a billboard ad at Oslo S train station showing a smiliing conductor and the text "Du må ikke sove. Joda, bare sov du."
AI STORIES

“Du må ikke sove”: a floating motif detached from its meaning (or: LLMs can write Norwegian but miss cultural references)

There’s a new ad for the train between Stavanger and Oslo in Norway that uses a line from Arnulf Øverland’s famous anti-fascist poem Du må ikke sove (“You must not sleep”). Du må ikke sove, you must not sleep, the ad says. And then it flips it, jovially, joda, bare […]

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.