I’ve been looking at Chinese blogs (1, 2, 3) and wondering whether they would look as utterly bloggish if they weren’t using western blogging tools and their templates. Often the timestamps and other paratexts are in English, anyway.

Still, it’s fascinating just looking. Do you know of a Chinese blog that has no English in it? And there must be ways of writing dates and times in Chinese without using arabic numerals (1 2 3), surely? (Joanna?)

Off to ISEA tomorrow and still working on that presentation on timestamps


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

1 Comment

  1. Joanna

    yes, there’s a way to write the date and time in Chinese. But we use arabic numbers a lot. It’s hard to find anyone else who use pure chinese nowadays.

    it’s right that it should have a chinese blogging tool format that fits in chinese text and it might possibly look better than chinese text that fits in western blogging tool/templates. as the leading and words spacing of chinese is different than english. it’s hard to make chinese word look good and clear on the web as each chinese character has so many strokes to form a character – the leading between each line, spacing between each word. example no 1 is simplied chinese (less strokes).

    and this example is written in traditional chinese (more strokes). we use traditional chinese in hong kong and mainland china people use simplified chinese.
    http://coltkwong.com/oneseek/
    one seek means “wun sek” in cantonese and it means look for food.

    http://www.gweilodiaries.com/ – this guy is an exapt who lives in hk.

    the blog in hong kong are mostly written n english and most of the bloggers are expatriate living here.

    these are blog in china – http://www.blogchina.com/
    http://www.bianzhi.net/aloo/

    today, i read a lifestyle magazine and they talked about blogsphere hahha, it’s a coincident.:)

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

AI STORIES

AI-generated stories have longer endings than human stories

My colleague Jessica Witte has just shared a preprint where she compared the emotional arcs of the stories we generated using gpt-4o-mini to those of human-authored (pre-2022) stories from the subreddit r/WritingPrompts, conveniently gathered in this dataset. She found a distinct difference in the endings of the LLM-generated stories: both […]

How to peer review a paper in 2026

Dorothy Bishop, a psychologist, wrote a useful list of what reviewers need to look out now that so many papers are bad science that looks good thanks to LLMs. Read her whole blog post, she explains it well, but here’s a brief version because I’m pretty sure we’ll be needing […]

“So what if it was ChatGPT? It *could* have been true!”

I recently read a good article on the different kinds of truth a language model operates with by Luke Mann, Liam Magee and Vanicka Arora, Truth Machines: Synthesizing Veracity in AI Language Models, but despite its lovely typology of truths (consensus, correspondence, coherence and pragmatic) it doesn’t help me with […]

AI STORIES

AI shimmer and sparkle

I have this hunch that sparkles and glow and shimmer are somehow a point in the latent spaces of LLMs that have more connections than you would expect. Perhaps their connotation to magic and to the unknown matches some of the mystique of genAI? Or perhaps these words are used […]

Don’t do a systematic review if you’re in the humanities

This paper is a great example of why you probably shouldn’t use a systematic literature review for a theoretical and conceptual research question like “How does artificial intelligence affect the perception of authenticity and aura in art?” However, if you’re looking for an annotated list of 48 recent articles about […]