I should probably keep my trap shut. But honestly.

Mark wrote another update to his question about the cluster, surprised at Torill’s remark that we don’t need to link so much to each others work anymore, in part because we have other ways of communicating as well. He writes:

[Torill wrote] “We are in positions where we don’t have to talk through the blogs. We can invite each others for lectures and speeches, and then we can do the commenting face to face.” As a scientist, I find this strange and dismaying: the first duty of a scientist is to disseminate the data. But the humanities are not like you and I.

What!!??? For goodness sake, what kind of alienating rhetoric is that? Us versus them? Lectures, talks and publishing articles isn’t dissemination anymore? Torill’s conference blogging (read her many posts from Other Players in Copenhagen today, or from State of Play and Serious Games last month) isn’t dissemination? Huh?

So, the cluster’s still here and the machinery still works — at least, if you give it a good kick.

So that’s what you were doing? Kicking doesn’t seem a very nice image, to be honest.

I don’t think we need to protect clusters. I’d rather stay open to new ideas, keep strong friendsships and also exchange ideas with many people.
I think we should just read what interests us, and I don’t really care whether that’s because of the topic matter, or because it’s written by a friend, or whatever. Perhaps “cluster” is the wrong word, anyway. Why not just accept we have loose networks that change constantly?

6 thoughts on “..and 3

  1. […] n and communication

    there is a conversation beginning/ongoing between torill, jill, and mark about such things as network strength and different ways of communicating and […]

  2. mark bernstein

    The question wasn’t the looseness of networks — it was, is this a network at all? Or has it become something else? Where are the connections amongst weblogs?

  3. bicyclemark

    Why wouldn’t it be a network then? Loose.. disfunctional.. close.. not close.. still a network of some sort. What’s the rush to define it?

  4. mark bernstein

    Well, people who study weblogs, study weblogs. Patterns of linkage among weblogs are interesting, and worth closer and more systematic study.

  5. bicyclemark

    Agreed then.

  6. Norman

    Am I alone in worrying that there’s an increasingly strong trend to spend time over-analysing relationships, to the detriment of analysis of ideas? The inter-relationship between the two aspects [despite some of the ‘excitement’ some express in ‘discovering’ that our analysis isn’t imuune to baggage we bring to the process of analysis] isn’t something unknown to everyone in earlier generations. It does seem to me, however, that society’s current preoccupation with finding ‘everything’ is relativistic, often results in higher level analytical skills not being as fully developed as they could, and should, be.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Machine Vision

Cultural Representations of Machine Vision: An Experimental Mixed Methods Workshop

Call for submissions to a workshop, Bergen, Norway
Workshop dates: 15-17 August 2022
Proposals due: 15 June

The Machine Vision in Everyday Life project invites proposals for an interdisciplinary workshop using qualitative approaches and digital methods to analyse how machine vision is represented in art, science fiction, games, social media and other forms of cultural and aesthetic expression.

Digital Humanities Machine Vision

What do different machine vision technologies do in fiction and art?

For the Machine Vision in Everyday Life project we’ve analysed how machine vision technologies are portrayed and used in 500 works of fiction and art, including 77 digital games, 190 digital artworks and 233 movies, novels and other narratives. You can browse […]

AI and algorithmic culture Presentations

My talk on caring AIs in recent sci-fi novels

I’m giving a talk at an actual f2f academic conference today, Critical Borders, Radical Re(visions) of AI, in Cambridge. I was particularly excited to see this conference because it’s organised by the people who edited AI Narratives A History of Imaginative Thinking […]